The Internet--a private eye's best friend
NEW YORK--For private investigator Steven Rambam, the Internet is his most valuable tool in helping to find missing persons, cheating husbands, and your competitor's dirty secrets.

Steven Rambam, director of investigative agency Pallorium, tells the crowd at the Last HOPE conference that "privacy is dead."
(Credit: Elinor Mills)But while the intelligence business is booming, individuals are losing the battle to protect their privacy with every blog post, Google Web search, and online photo, Rambam, director of the Pallorium investigative agency, said in a keynote session late on Saturday at the Last HOPE (Hackers on Planet Earth) conference.
"Anything you put on the Internet will be grabbed, indexed, cataloged, and out of your control before you know it," he told CNET News after the session. "The genie is out of the bottle. Data doesn't stay in one location. It migrates to hundreds of places."
Information that he used to have to search for or dig up in far away places is now available at his fingertips. All types of information is being digitized, older stuff is being scanned and put online, and it's all being aggregated into uber-databases that are being sold to marketers, government agencies, and anyone else who can pay, he said.
Rambam says he searches on social networks to find photos of what people he is researching look like, the first step in any investigation. He gets a lot of other vital data from those sites, like hometown, age, relationship status, school and work history, hobbies, and friends and acquaintances to interview. With Twitter, he can often see where they are right now, or at least in the recent archived past.
"I used to pay the police $500 for a driver's license photo. Now I just have to go to MySpace," he said. "I can find your location without leaving my desk."
He uses job sites to see someone's resume, date of birth, address, and work history, to find former employees of companies he is researching and to see what job openings they have and compare salary levels. And then there are sites like Don'tDateHimGirl.com and Who'sARat.com where you can find what a person's enemies have to say.
Rambam also gets information from marketing databases that gather information on people's buying habits and preferences from frequent customer cards, surveys, product registrations, actual transactions, and other activities.
Marketing databases with vast amounts of personal records are being purchased by the government, he said. At the same time, individuals have less power to learn what information is being gathered on them and how it is being used, because private entities are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, he added.
"Dominos has built the biggest consumer database in America," and the U.S. Marshall's Service, the New York Police Department and collection agencies are using it to track people down, Rambam said.
There also are vast stores of data based on peoples' Web and computer activities being amassed by technology companies that can be easily used to connect a specific individual to specific activities and information. For example, end user license agreements allow for location data to be sent back to the manufacturer every time a customer logs in, and photos and burned CDs and DVDs have unique serial numbers for tracking, he said.
Then there is the "snitch" in everyone's pocket--the cell phone. Unlike your activity on a computer, "a cell phone can be immediately traced to you and you have it with you 24/7," Rambam said.
"Cell phones change everything," because of their location-based technology, he said. "I'm able to know who you talked to, where you are, what you do, and what you like just from cross-referencing cell phone (data)."
Finally, cameras and video cameras have helped revolutionize the snooping industry. Smart cameras with facial and activity recognition analytic capabilities are popping up everywhere, while the FBI and others are testing systems that will recognize the walking gait of individuals, Rambam said.
There are police helicopters in New York that can see what a car passenger is reading. New York is partnering with businesses and landlords to install 3,000 cameras in lower Manhattan and has spent $450 million to install 3,000 cameras in the subway, he said.
In a test of his skills, Rambam tracked down someone who had agreed to go in hiding for one year. He was able to locate the person nine times, using methods including social engineering and a dummy e-mail account, tracking the IP address of an Internet cafe computer, cell phone triangulation, a credit card trace on an airline ticket using a frequent flier number, a fake Match.com ad, and an online "wanted" poster.
Rambam, who details the experiment in a book titled Stealing Your Own Identity, also was able to track his subject through his pharmacy and doctor.
And in an ingenious move, he noticed that there were blocks of photos with consecutive unique IDs on the subject's Web site that were missing. So he searched for photos with ID numbers that would fit in that sequence on Flickr and found shots that gave away his target's whereabouts.
Although he works closely with law enforcement agencies, Rambam has had a legal run-in of his own, just like some of the hackers in the audience. He had been scheduled to speak at the previous HOPE in 2006, but was arrested right before he was to give his talk and spent two days in jail on charges of impersonating an FBI agent and tampering with a government witness. The charges were dropped and his accuser now faces arrest, he said.

New York City is installing video cameras all over the city, Rambam says.
(Credit: Pallorium)
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.






For stuff that is important (financial details, home address, etc), a PI would have a fairly hard time of it, since I don't post them anywhere publicly. Internet stalkers have had a so-far impossible time of it (ask some of 'em in here :) ). Unless I specifically tell someone, it seems that most attempts have led down a myriad of blind alleys.
Not that this makes me complacent, but something else to consider: If I truly wished to disappear but still stay online, it would be almost trivially easy to do. My ISP allows me to change my email address at whim, and the rest is drop-easy.
I mean, I see he's bribed police officers in the past - PI's and a lot of police are nothing more than criminals in disguise - he clearly has no qualms about breaking the law himself...
Privacy is only dead because so many parasites like this guy will do anything including selling out his fellow man, for a buck.
I am sharing this with my friends.
This goes beyond how many pizzas you order. Is no one else concerned about the distribution of private information between a retailer and government agencies?
Nowadays it's not only the cost of doing business but the price for having an identity.
[CNET editor's note: link deleted]
So Inachu! I see you have a nice collection of Dr. Who...... ERRR wrong! misinformation.
This would make the P.I look like a complete noob.
Why try to hide if your conscience is clear?
I see you didn't post anything that could ID you. You must have something to hide! I hope CNET turns you in.
I wish the world was so good, but then there is reality to deal with....I would wear a wireless cam 24/7 to prove I am honest and good but then they would just throw that evidence out if they had enough motivation to silence me.
Do I sound paranoid enough yet?
Information online is a concern... you can find out about almost anyone. Privacy is not a priority to this government... corporations are. In other countries, things are different.
-
by teraphim
September 10, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
- The failure of any institution to protect citizen's rights in regard to official commercial media exacerbates the consolidation-access problem. I was personally the victim of journalists and tv news reporters who twisted a situation I was in to write an utterly false story that they regarded as "hot" for their readers. In the case of the TV news, the local NBC station spliced parts of an interview with their own questions to invent a situation, and other news stations just copied NBC and pasted my picture everywhere.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(26 Comments)There was nothing I can do about this. No journalism oversight agency existed to intervene, and no heroic lawyer bothered to intervene to protect my rights (especially since the media lie already put me on the bad side of public opinion). This official media was copied by bloggers, who of course added their own outraged opinions based on completely false information.
Because of the Internet and Google, this false story will define my life forever. I'm unemployable. There's no chance of even temp work turning into something permanent once my colleagues and boss start Googling me. If I never even get an interview in the first place, there's no way I can prove that I was excluded through Googling, so I would have no legal recourse even if a chronically unemployed person could afford a good lawyer.
I often wonder how many other people are in the same situation. I wonder how many people with a name similar to mine might also be affected by invisible Google-based prejudice. Perhaps this seems extreme, but the only solution I can see is some power of information-freezing reverting to the individual citizen. That would mean that upon any personal information leak complaint, any web page (not whole site) would be rapidly blocked by the web host (and expunged from Google) until complaint is resolved or shown to be spurious (i.e., no identifying information, intent to harass web site owner). Because of what happened to me, I include in "official media", such as newspaper web sites under this blackout power. Newspapers would be required to resolve any non-public-figure complaining about how they were used for story before the story can return to be posted on the web. It seems to me that any important story can be told without using the names of non-public figures, and if they are doing the right thing journalists are likely to actually get permission to publicize names.
If this seems like some radical call to block freedom of information, think of the people like me whose prospects in life and relation to society have been utterly controlled and ruined by the agendas of powerful information purveyors. The rights and protections of the individual should be the most basic of society. Unless my behavior is posting some dire threat to others (re: I'm wandering around waving a knife at random people) then there is absolutely no reason society in general needs to know *anything* about me. I should be able to support myself through work based only on my skills and qualifications. I should be able to meet people and make friends based on my interaction with them, not a Google dossier.
Of course the right to privacy decreases surveillance of society, and could ease the commission of crimes. Because of this, the increased protection of privacy should be balanced by increased options to *privately* arbitrate disputes and convey information to law enforcement personnel. Right now the collapse of privacy is being accompanied by decreasing access to justice for the "little people". Most people can't afford even minimal use of the legal system, and everything done there goes into the "public record", and potentially the Internet. This is a recipe for human rights disaster. This can only be reversed by actively protecting privacy while increasing means for problem resolution and access to justice at the lowest levels.