• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
October 20, 2009 5:01 PM PDT

ChoicePoint to pay $275,000 in latest data breach

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

ChoicePoint, one of the nation's largest data brokers, has been fined $275,000 by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for a data breach that exposed personal information of 13,750 people last year.

In April 2008, ChoicePoint turned off a key electronic security tool that it used to monitor access to one of its databases and failed to notice the problem for four months, according to an FTC statement.

During that period, unauthorized searches were conducted for 30 days on a ChoicePoint database that contained Social Security numbers and other sensitive information, the FTC said.

The FTC alleged that ChoicePoint's conduct violated a 2006 court order requiring the company to institute a comprehensive information security program following a 2005 breach that compromised the personal information of more than 163,000 people and resulted in at least 800 cases of identity fraud. The company was ordered to pay $10 million in civil penalties and $5 million to consumers in that case.

To settle the recent charges, ChoicePoint agreed to pay the fine and provide reports on its data protection practices to the FTC every two months for two years.

Meanwhile, payroll processor PayChoice has had two data breaches in less than a month. On October 1, the company said it was investigating a breach in which targeted e-mails were sent to customers that attempted to trick them into downloading malware.

Then last week, PayChoice told customers it was again shutting down its online portal after clients started noticing fake employees being added to their payroll in what is likely the second stage of a broader attack, according to the Security Fix blog.

It appears that attackers stole login IDs and passwords by exploiting a weakness in the Web site component that allows customers to change their portal passwords, the report said. The usernames and passwords were then included in the e-mails sent out to customers a few weeks ago.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from Security
Hacker 'Mudge' gets DARPA job
Log in with your face
See what's under McAfee's new interface
26 Windows, Office holes patched in 13 bulletins
McAfee: Spammers exploiting more news stories
Microsoft, Google split over browser bug bounty
Verizon temporarily blocks some 4chan sites
Security software maker Vitamin D exits beta
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by 42istheanswer October 20, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
I'm sure there was some hot shot manager there that decided service to the user was more important than maintenance and security. There will be many more like this, because there are plenty of clueless managers.
Reply to this comment
by mbenedict October 20, 2009 7:55 PM PDT
Even if that were true, there should have been an independent periodic assessment to detect this kind of problems. <br /><br />While I don't know the type of security system that was turned off at ChoicePoint, generally detection systems feed into security event management logs which are to be reviewed on an ongoing basis. The fact that they didn't detect this condition for four months -- and that an actual breach actually happened during this period -- means there were larger issues at ChoicePoint than a single manager turning things off.
1 person likes this comment
by MadLyb October 20, 2009 7:47 PM PDT
When is the FTC going to start shutting these companies down? $275K is a slap on the wrist for basically ruining someone's life. Hopefully, one of the victim's will sue them into oblivion.
Reply to this comment
by krosafcheg October 20, 2009 9:57 PM PDT
Irony here is that it was probably the Government itself in there digging around...lol
Reply to this comment
by gefitz October 21, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
Exactly! Lol....we can't spend too much enforcement power locking these guys down. Where would The Man steal all his information about me from? ;)
by weegg October 21, 2009 5:37 AM PDT
Should have been 275 million penalty for them.
Reply to this comment
by Get_Bent October 21, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
$275,000 / 13,750 = $20 per person. I'm sure ChoicePoint's wrist really stings after that one....
Reply to this comment
by Ronlap October 21, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
Isn't the penalty for a second violation usually MORE than the penalty for the first violation? If they screw up again, will the FTC be paying them??
Reply to this comment
by rcbret February 9, 2010 1:41 PM PST
THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR ANY CREDIT REPORTING AGENCY (CRA), NOR FOR ANY ORGANIZATION CHARGED WITH MAINTAINING THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF OUR INDIVIDUAL CREDIT INFORMATION, FAILING TO MEET AN ABSOLUTE STANDARD OF SAFETY AND SECURITY, WHICH MUST ALWAYS BE DEMANDED OF ANY SUCH INSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right