• On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
August 25, 2009 7:43 AM PDT

Jessica Biel most 'dangerous' celeb in cyberspace

by Lance Whitney
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 40 comments

Through no fault of her own, actress Jessica Biel is now the most hazardous celebrity on the Internet.

Jessica Biel

McAfee names Jessica Biel most dangerous celebrity online in 2009.

(Credit: Business Wire)

Fans searching online for Biel have a one-in-five chance of hitting a Web site with malware, according to McAfee's third annual report listing Hollywood's most "dangerous" online celebrities.

In general, hunting for Hollywood's in-crowd poses a much greater threat than searching for just about anyone else. For example, President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama ranked No. 34 and No. 39, respectively.

Other unsafe celebrities near the top of the cybersecurity company's list include singer Beyonce at No. 2, former "Friends" star Jennifer Aniston at No. 3, and football hero Tom Brady, who came in at No. 4.

McAfee found that searching for photos, videos, downloads, wallpaper, and screensavers of celebrities who made the list could prove hazardous to the health of your computer.

"Cybercriminals are star watchers too--they latch onto popular celebrities to encourage the download of malicious software in disguise," Jeff Green, senior vice president of McAfee Avert Labs, said Tuesday in a statement. "Consumers' obsession with celebrity news and culture is harmless in theory, but one bad download can cause a lot of damage to a computer."

Using its SiteAdvisor technology, McAfee compiled the list by hunting for celebrity names that produced the largest number of risky sites and the highest percentage of risk.

McAfee's top 15 most "dangerous" celebrities

Top 15 most dangerous celebrities (Credit: McAfee)

Lance Whitney wears a few different technology hats--journalist, Web developer, and software trainer. He's a contributing editor for Microsoft TechNet Magazine and writes for other computer publications and Web sites. You can follow Lance on Twitter at @lancewhit. Lance is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and he is not an employee of CNET.
advertisement
Click Here
Recent posts from Security
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
Microsoft warns of IE exploit code in the wild
Chrome OS security: 'Sandboxing' and auto updates
E-tailers snagged in marketing 'scam' blame customers
McAfee warns about '12 Scams of Christmas'
Cisco launches iPhone security app
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
New Firefox 3.6 beta aims to cut crashes
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (40 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tyshockner August 25, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
Not surprising.

[CNET editors' note: URL deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by KillersDad August 25, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
Um, does this mean now that I've read this article my computer is subject to malware?
Reply to this comment
by pentest August 27, 2009 7:33 AM PDT
Only if Windows is running on it.
by Jack K1 August 25, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
There's an "Avi Ben Stella" hoax that's been going around that does pretty much the same thing. Like the people featured above, it's a "keyword" attack whereby users searching on a keyword, in this case, a person's name, end up on an infected webpage.

What I don't understand is this - if McAfee can locate these pages, why can't Google locate and temporarily suspend them, too? I'd think "do no harm" would include a bar against serving up malware.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 August 26, 2009 1:57 AM PDT
Because a deluge of whining college students would start Facebook groups accusing them of censorship and *demanding* they stop *right now*.
by freebird1974 August 26, 2009 5:32 AM PDT
Google can suspend these pages BUT..................there are web sites that link to these web pages so if you go after Google you have to go after every site that links to these pages. Also thats how 50 percent of people get to these pages. they may be wanting information on an artist then go to a legit site that has a link to the dangerous site.
by dumbspammers August 25, 2009 8:54 AM PDT
Who? Never heard of her.
Reply to this comment
by EcuadorHomesOnline August 25, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
Me neither! The article bills her as "actress" Jessica Biel but I have no idea what she's done.
by sanenazok August 25, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
She's in motion pictures. Rent "The Illusionist" it's not half bad.
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 11:16 PM PDT
The Prestige was much better movie--if you like that genre.
by jennyquatro August 25, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
Yet another reason that I'm glad to have Macs. Not that I would search for her anyway. ;-)
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian August 25, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
Caution is still warranted. Though there hasn't been a virus or worm that affects OS X yet, there has been a few trojans targeted to Mac users.
by shycelticwitch August 25, 2009 12:16 PM PDT
Dalkorian is correct. I have run across a few Trojans for Macs in the last few years but Norton caught them before they entered my system. There are a few sub-human souls out there that go after the Apple tree, but most of them proliferate and gravitate towards Windows and Linux. I am almost 100% Mac, but every one of my systems has anti virus protection. The best thing about that on a Mac is you hardly know it's there.
by Eddie-c August 25, 2009 9:11 AM PDT
Glad I'm an amoeba. I don't need to look up celebrities. :P
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
One more reason to get a Mac: Porn-safe surfing.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease August 25, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
I just "got" your handle. It isn't about switching to a Mac, it is about "switching." :)
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
RIght, as in being able to hit left and right handed in my sofball league.
by Dalkorian August 25, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
The "bad guys" understand the difficulty of getting worms and viruses to work in OS X, which is why they resort to trojan horses. Getting the OS of the user is pretty easy.

You are not safe, only safer than most mouth breathers.
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
God man, give it a rest already and the pathetic desperate attempts to spread the idea that somehow trojans are running rampant on Macs.
by gofalcons August 25, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
hey happy switcher, you give it a rest, youre in the minority of 10% who use apples, talking trash about a company with a 90% share is just plain stupid.......
by garpsbrother August 25, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
Oh, she's dangerous all right...

She can inspire a three-way between a malware, a spyware and an adware.
She can ground an ocean liner at 20,000 leagues.
She can make a freight train take a dirt road.
Reply to this comment
by faceless128 August 25, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
i'm shocked that Reese Witherspoon is in the top 15...
Reply to this comment
by lewac August 25, 2009 10:04 AM PDT
run linux
Reply to this comment
by darkebinary August 25, 2009 10:18 AM PDT
I noticed screensavers are mentioned in a lot of these findings. I'm kind of interested in what percentage of sites would have malware if they googled "screensavers". I would bet it's over 75%.
Reply to this comment
by BtmnHatesRbn August 25, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
Who's Jessica Biel?
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 10:50 AM PDT
"No. 3, and football hero Tom Brady" I find this an offensive use of the word 'hero.' Some guy getting millions of dollars a year to throw a football isn't a hero. The men and women risking their lives in the military/police force/firefighters, etc. are the real heroes.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok August 25, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
It's "football hero" which is a hero in his line of work. He's a hero to some people, especially to football fans. This sort of indignation should be targeted to something more worthwhile.
by The_happy_switcher August 25, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
There's nothing heroic about it. I don't care what you or other football fans say.
by Scottrosenberg91 August 25, 2009 8:38 PM PDT
its really worth getting worked up about...
by TigaAyes August 25, 2009 9:29 PM PDT
I'm with .._switcher, HERO should be reserved for those who put there lives in danger to protect the lives of others

athletes can be stars, champions, superstars, virtuosos, paladins, mavins, megastars, but please not heroes
by dennisheadley August 26, 2009 7:47 AM PDT
I would have to agree about athletes in general not being heros.

The closest thing to a football hero in the last 25 years would be Steve Largent. Played 13 years for the Seattle Seahawks, broke EVERY receiving record in football as well as many consecutive game records, 7 pro-bowl teams etc.. And right up until the day he retired, he insisted on receiving the league minimum salary even though he could easily have gone to any team in the NFL and been the highest paid receiver in the game. He played hurt, he never complained, never missed a game or training camp because he wanted more money.

He played football just because he loved the game. In a period of time where every other player seems to only care about how much money they can hold out for, he stood out above all the rest of the game in my book.
by sodapop2k9 August 25, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
Just use a Macintosh or iPhone.
Reply to this comment
by setjeff15081947 August 25, 2009 2:07 PM PDT
How appropriate that searching for Jessica Biel, The Henkie, produces nothing but grief and malware for the searcher. Henkie! Actually, I feel that searching for any of these Henkies should land you in the Malware-Soup ? especially that Beyoncé, the ?barbara-of-babylon?! Only my searches should produce frontal-nudes. ?Auto-Power?!
Reply to this comment
by dumbestcrayon August 25, 2009 9:19 PM PDT
This is such a waste of space omg....


Who cares?
Reply to this comment
by ramka001 August 25, 2009 9:44 PM PDT
This is meant for Microsoft users. Other OSes are Immune :)
Reply to this comment
by PunkCityKid2 August 26, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
How's Steve Jobs' D taste?
by frantaylor August 26, 2009 12:43 AM PDT
'talking trash about a company with a 90% share is just plain stupid......."

Wow, what stunning ignorance. Ford had similar market share in the Model T days, look at them now.

Use a Linux Live CD and you won't have to worry about getting any virus. Save your stuff on a USB key mounted noexec.
Reply to this comment
by freebird1974 August 26, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
No kidding man, people love screensavers and 95 percent of people download them from these types of sites. I am asked all the time "where can I get that new cool screensaver of their favorite artist or movie star?" I can't give them an honest answer because their are sooooooooo many of these bogus ass sites out there
Reply to this comment
by RockingJamboree August 26, 2009 7:12 AM PDT
Why are 14 of the 16 names listed here women? Is this a case of sexism? Is this another way society victimizes women? How can these celebrities fight having their names and likenesses used to spread the cyber-evil of viruses, malware, spyware and adware? Are the celebrities themselves at all morally responsible for what gets done "in their name"? Maybe not. But should Jessica Biel feel flattered or ashamed to top this list?
Reply to this comment
by pentest August 28, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
Yeah it is sexism and victimizes women. ***???

The victims are the retarded guys that follow these links and download malware onto their windows systems.
(40 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right