• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
July 9, 2009 12:23 PM PDT

Users upset after CA anti-virus detects Windows system file as virus

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

This CA user forum was filled with comments from confused and upset customers after the software detected a Windows system file as a virus.

(Credit: Computer Associates)

Users of Computer Associates anti-virus software were complaining on Thursday after the company's anti-virus software mistakenly identified a Windows XP systems file as a virus.

Some customers were concerned that the Windows Service Pack 3 and files from the commercial Cygwin application files deleted when they couldn't find them. However, CA said the files were intact but quarantined and the file extensions were modified.

CA said it learned on Wednesday that its software had detected the file "Win32/AMalum.ZZQIA" as a false positive and was urging customers to update Signature 6606 to address the situation.

The CA advisory reads:

"CA Internet Security Suite users should restore affected files from quarantine using the GUI. CA Threat Manager customers should search local hard drives for files with the extension .AVB and manually rename to their original file extension by removing the appended text on the original file name."

Through its customer support CA also is offering a tool to search for the affected files and restore them to the original extension.

In the meantime, CA customers were griping on the CA forum. "Shame on CA for not being on top of this," one customer wrote. "Sure things happen, I've seen game patches erase hard drives, stuff happens. But it's what you do after that defines the value of your company."

"This latest nonsense with a false positive detection that causes damage to the operating system is the last straw for me. I have had continuing problems with CA AntiVirus crashing during email downloads with Thunderbirds," wrote another customer. "I am changing to Sophos. So far, it works fine and no false positives. ... I guess CA has gotten too big and forgotten that customer service is an an important part of doing business."

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
advertisement
Click Here
Recent posts from Security
EFF sues feds for info on social-network surveillance
Microsoft: November security updates are fine
Fake CDC vaccine e-mail leads to malware
IBM buys database security firm Guardium
Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade
Microsoft investigating 'black screen of death'
Pub fined $13k for Wi-Fi copyright infringement
Tips for safe online shopping
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by BK216 July 9, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
this is the first time i've ever heard of "Computer Associates anti-virus"

I thought you mean Comodo Anti-Virus for a sec...Anywho, Avast/MSE should be the only options you consider (unless you HAVE to pay for it, then go Nod32 or Kaspersky)
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 9, 2009 5:30 PM PDT
Computer Associates makes a popular enterprise level AV product called 'eTrust'.
by Forked_Tongue July 29, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Agreed I use free Avast Home on all my user machines and pay for Nod32 on the homeserver, best of both worlds.
by slickuser July 9, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
I think it did the right thing ie. found XP as a virus....
Reply to this comment
by DMAN3k July 9, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
at least it doesn't get hacked in 3 seconds.
by ballmerisanape July 9, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
Your right.. that's way too long. All you have to do is connect it to a network! Now that's real plug and play!
by Vegaman_Dan July 9, 2009 5:33 PM PDT
Geez, losers sure show up fast to troll.

Yes, the Mac got hacked in a contest. So have Windows systems. They offer different features for different people.

Drop it.
by DMAN3k July 9, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
You would think that CA would actually test the patch on the target operating system before releasing it... CA sucks.
Reply to this comment
by Arrgster July 9, 2009 1:21 PM PDT
We use Sophos, never have a problem...
Reply to this comment
by rucknrun July 9, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
I use CA it is extremely lightweight. I also got it free with a new pc. Norton was bogging down some of my older machines.

I hope I don't get home and my media server is hosed cause of this.
Reply to this comment
by Orion Blastar July 9, 2009 1:34 PM PDT
So it is true, Windows really is a virus! Hirez proof of Microsoft Malware in Windows XP SP3 code.

Just kidding.

False positives are never that fun.
Reply to this comment
by stevemoss1 July 9, 2009 1:45 PM PDT
Hmmm, I don't think CA made a mistake at all - was just doing it's job.
Reply to this comment
by fmcentire July 9, 2009 1:58 PM PDT
CA is just a cluster F*** of a system. We use some of their other systems where I work and they are a problem most of the time.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior July 9, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
Well it makes sense. What would one expect from people who have an Associates degree in computers (LOL). They need professionals to do the job, otherwise they would keep detecting system files as viruses.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 9, 2009 5:34 PM PDT
We used to use CA for AV needs at my job. I recall when it detected it own definition files as a possible trojan and locked itself down hard. eTrust had taken itself out. Heh.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss July 9, 2009 6:14 PM PDT
CA is still in business? I thought they were all in jail. Nobody but a bunch of S/370 coders would buy this POS thinking they are recalling their glory days when CA actually mattered. Close the book on them now.
Reply to this comment
by Inconnux July 9, 2009 8:19 PM PDT
amazing... did they even test this on one system??? I would cancel my contract immediately if I ran this anti-virus.
Reply to this comment
by July 9, 2009 9:21 PM PDT
I had been pulling my hair out trying to figure out how I managed to get a virus, until I saw this article. Computer Associates really dropped the ball on this one.
Reply to this comment
by photohiker July 13, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
It only took me 5 days to figure out that CA int. security suite was crap. (30Day guarantee) BS! I purchased in march of this year and still haven't gotten a refund. FAXED all required paperwork twice and somehow they keep loosing it. Outsourced help from India is a joke. can't get phone help unless you pay. Radio Shack and John Walsh should be truly embarrassed to have their names associated with this company.
Reply to this comment
by iwish40 July 13, 2009 10:44 PM PDT
I used to have CA and it worked fine untill about 1 month before the Subscription update. I got hit with some kind of virus, my computer came to a 20 min or longer start-up time.
Nothing would hardly work.
I contacted the Microsoft support and it took them 4 DAYS to fix my computer (At NO CHARGE), then I installed Windows OneCare and it's been fine eversince.
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right