Report: Hackers broke into FAA air traffic control systems
Hackers have broken into the air traffic control mission-support systems of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration several times in recent years, according to an Inspector General report sent to the FAA this week.
In February, hackers compromised an FAA public-facing computer and used it to gain access to personally identifiable information, such as Social Security numbers, on 48,000 current and former FAA employees, the report said.
Last year, hackers took control of FAA critical network servers and could have shut them down, which would have seriously disrupted the agency's mission-support network, the report said. Hackers took over FAA computers in Alaska, becoming "insiders," according to the report dated Monday.
Then, taking advantage of interconnected networks, hackers later stole an administrator's password in Oklahoma, installed "malicious codes" with the stolen password and compromised the FAA domain controller in the Western Pacific Region, giving them the access to more than 40,000 FAA user IDs, passwords, and other data used to control a portion of the mission-support network, the report said.
And in 2006, a virus spread to the air traffic control (ATC) systems, forcing the FAA to shut down a portion of its systems in Alaska, according to the report.
The attacks so far have primarily disrupted mission-support functions, but attacks could spread over network connections from those areas to the operational networks where real-time surveillance, communications and flight information is processed, the report warned.
"In our opinion, unless effective action is taken quickly, it is likely to be a matter of when, not if, ATC systems encounter attacks that do serious harm to ATC operations," the report concluded.
An audit of the FAA's air traffic control cybersecurity protection measures finds them lacking and says there have been several breaches by hackers and a virus.
(Credit: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General)The breaches were possible because Web applications that support the air traffic control system operations are not properly secured to prevent unauthorized access and network intrusion-detection software is not adequately being used to monitor and detect cyberattacks, the report concluded.
The FAA's increasing use of commercial software and Internet Protocol-based technologies as part of an effort to modernize the air traffic control systems poses a higher security risk to the systems than when they relied primarily on proprietary software, the report said.
"Now, attackers can take advantage of software vulnerabilities in commercial IP products to exploit ATC systems, which is especially worrisome at a time when the Nation is facing increased threats from sophisticated nation-state-sponsored cyber attacks," the report said.
In general, the nation's critical infrastructure is increasingly at risk as previously isolated and closed systems are moved to the Internet and commercial software, like Windows, is used, security experts have said.
The air traffic control system auditors said they discovered more than 760 high-risk vulnerabilities in the Web applications tested, including holes that provided "front-door access" to the systems and could allow attackers to inject malicious code onto FAA user computers. Web applications were not adequately configured and the applications with known vulnerabilities were not patched in a timely manner, auditors found.
Meanwhile, intrusion detection systems (IDS) are deployed at only 11 of hundreds of air traffic control facilities and none of the IDS sensors is installed to monitor operational systems at those sites, the report said. Cyber incidents are not effectively monitored or fixed quickly, the report concluded.
In 2008, more than 870 cyber incident alerts were issued to the organization responsible for air traffic control operations and by the end of the year 17 percent (more than 150 incidents) had not been remediated, "including critical incidents in which hackers may have taken over control" of operations computers, the report said.
The FAA is "identifying and fixing weaknesses," FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown told The Wall Street Journal. "We are working on developing security architecture for that whole system."
However, Brown dismissed the notion that hackers could get access to critical air traffic control operational systems.
The audit of the air traffic control systems was requested by the ranking minority members of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and its Aviation Subcommittee.
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor. 





What the hell are "malicious codes"?
should tell you how vulnerable the FAA is.......if you watch the movie Sneakers...it might give you a better idea
[CNET editors' note: Prohibited content deleted.]
Using Microsoft Windows servers throughout the organization? Are they nuts? I've got nothing against Microsoft but there are far too many hacker/cracker toolkits out there for people to pick up, modify and use. Security through obscurity has some value. Go with an OS like AIX or Solaris and harden it. That's what we did at the last org I ran - using these machines for public-facing (Internet) servers.
The FAA in DC has spent the last 2 years either reclassifying or retiring it's IT staff, effectively purging most of the competent IT staff.
The bureaucrats answer: hire contractors. (low bidder)
So we wind up with a 30% increase in the cost and a 30% decrease in performance. The bureaucrats tell us it's a better way of doing business.
I'm not quite sure how you've pinned the blame for mistakes that have been going on for years on the administration that just took over the job 3 - 4 months ago. These systems were "modernized" during the Bush years weren't they?
Either way, it's pointless to try and attach a Democrat or Republican label to anything tech related. Attempting to do so only points our your ignorance of the topic being discussed.
Don't anthropomorphize code - they hate that.
At least no one was harmed by their actions!
<a href="http://www.ultimatedefensesystem.com/">Self Defense Moves</a>
When I was a prison guard, there were always a few wise ***** like you, who stood around and made snotty remarks about what other inmates said and did. It wasn?t long before they got the living s$$t kicked out of them. With 19 comments and counting in one day, you are one sick puppy. You might want to consider counseling before you hurt yourself or some one close to you.
Sanitation is the key whether it is the latest flu outbreak or somebody trying to exploit the system. The "magic key" in the form of the USB memory stick is pretty much gone where I work and it isn't coming back. The problem "jumped hosts" just like the so-called Swine Flu, in this case from camera flash cards carrying an extra package through the computers to the USB sticks and now we are paying the price. I think the IT folks at FAA and other government agencies are doing their job well against some rather huge odds. The intrusion attempts are measured in the millions, each day! However, where I work, spam is rare and reported when it happens. Sanitation means using those strong passwords, avoiding short cuts, and using secure signatures and encryption when appropriate.
Another thing on closed systems: The airliners were in a relatively closed system on 9/11. The only news that went into or out of the cockpit was either via radio with the FAA, the transponder, or messages read on a CDI (Control Display Indicator) from "Dispatch". The crew on Flight 97 was trying to confirm a CDI (or "CDU" for some folks) message when the highjackers broke in. The passengers found out what the game was via an open system, their cell phones, and took action.
- by Len Bullard May 11, 2009 7:15 AM PDT
- "This is what you get when non IT bureaucrats are driving the bus"
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)Consultant led IT shops pushed hard for the web as critical infrastructure in Washington DC and Silly Valley despite the protests from senior personnel who were intimately involveed with the design of the Internet. Every problem predicted in 1993 has come to pass and they still gave knighthood's and money awards to those who gave them bad advice about the ability of the open market to secure an inherently insecure system.
And predictably, those who did are now blaming others because they cannot face the facts that they had more to do with this than those whom they are blaming.
The Web Generation has failed to realize the depth of their mistakes and likely won't have to grow up any time soon, but everytime they board a passenger jet, they will be uneasy and should be when they fly in "the clouds". It's moronic to read the articles about cloud computing being embraced in the Beltwary and then look at the very same people telling us the critical infrastructure based on it is being hacked daily.
Oh just a few more releases and it will all be fine, right?