• On TechRepublic: Windows 7 report card: Hits and misses
February 24, 2009 11:38 AM PST

Attack exploits unpatched Excel security hole

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 13 comments

Attackers are attempting to exploit an unpatched security hole in Excel that could allow someone to take control of a compromised computer, Microsoft said in a security advisory on Tuesday.

The attack exploiting the Excel Unspecified Remote Code Execution Vulnerability requires a computer user to open an attachment sent via e-mail that has a maliciously crafted Excel document, according to the advisory.

Microsoft said it is working on a security fix to plug the hole and will release it after it has completed testing. In the meantime, Windows users are urged to avoid opening Office files from untrusted sources or that arrive unexpectedly.

Affected software includes Microsoft Office 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2007 and Microsoft Office 2004 and 2008 for Mac.

The exploit uses weak encryption in an attempt to evade detection, according to Symantec.

(Credit: Symantec)

Symantec has discovered malicious files in the wild in Japan that attempt to exploit the vulnerability and has updated its antivirus software to detect the malicious spreadsheet files it has dubbed Trojan.Mdropper.AC, the company said in a blog posting on Tuesday.

The risk is low and there have been few infections, Symantec said in an advisory. It lists Windows Vista and XP as affected systems.

"It turns out that this vulnerability exists in the old Excel binary .xls format and not the new .xlsx format," Symantec wrote. "Opening the malicious spreadsheet triggers the vulnerability. This causes the shellcode to execute and then drops two files on the system--the malicious binary mentioned earlier and another valid Excel document. The shellcode then executes the dropped file and opens the valid Excel document to mask the fact that Excel has just crashed. This helps to decrease suspicion when the affected spreadsheet is opened."

Microsoft also on Tuesday announced the availability of an update for Windows Autorun that allows people to selectively disable the Autorun functionality for drives on a system or network to provide more security.

The update addresses an issue that prevents the NoDriveTypeAutoRun registry key from functioning as expected. Disabling Autorun functionality can help prevent the execution of arbitrary code when a removable storage device is used.

The Autorun functionality has been blamed for malware that has infected USB thumb drives, leading to a temporary ban on their use at the U.S. Defense Department, and digital photo frames, among other storage types.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
advertisement
Click Here
Recent posts from Security
EFF sues feds for info on social-network surveillance
Microsoft: November security updates are fine
Fake CDC vaccine e-mail leads to malware
IBM buys database security firm Guardium
Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade
Microsoft investigating 'black screen of death'
Pub fined $13k for Wi-Fi copyright infringement
Tips for safe online shopping
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Marcus Westrup February 24, 2009 12:10 PM PST
It is not just email attachments you need to worry about, this type of exploit can also be delivered through compromised web sites.
Beware of what you download, and don't trust your anti-virus to save you ...
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 12:18 PM PST
Man - I'd hate to see what happens if this got onto a SharePoint based site with the Excel plugin... internal OR external. Couldn't think up a faster way to spread the 'love' to an entire corporation...
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan February 24, 2009 12:28 PM PST
And quite easily cleaned up and prevented in such an environment. The real issue in my opinion is with people opening up attachments in email that they don't know the sender or were not expecting the file. This is true of any OS or source.
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 1:01 PM PST
"And quite easily cleaned up and prevented in such an environment."

Depends on a few factors:

* was it caught before distribution?
* are there A/V sigs for your A/V setup that can/will detect it?
* does the malware automatically affect/infect all other spreadsheets within reach?
by wolivere February 24, 2009 1:12 PM PST
@Peng

How many major corps allow attachments?
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 1:42 PM PST
@wolivere:

Once it's in it doesn't matter. You also neglect intentional infections by employees either laid-off but still connected, or about to be laid-off.

Security - it's not just for breakfast anymore ;)
by Vegaman_Dan February 24, 2009 8:25 PM PST
Penguinisto wrote:

"Once it's in it doesn't matter. "

The article states that it spreads by attachments in email. It's a matter of simplicity to screen for this in an enterprise system. Anyone even barely competent in network security can do this.

And it's true- there isn't much point in attaching documents in email anymore with files existing on file servers or cloud services these days. I cannot honestly recall the last time I saw a file attachment in email. Several years, perhaps?
by Vegaman_Dan February 24, 2009 8:26 PM PST
Penguinisto wrote:

"Once it's in it doesn't matter. "

The article states that it spreads by attachments in email. It's a matter of simplicity to screen for this in an enterprise system. Anyone even barely competent in network security can do this.

And it's true- there isn't much point in attaching documents in email anymore with files existing on file servers or cloud services these days. I cannot honestly recall the last time I saw a file attachment in email. Several years, perhaps?
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 8:29 PM PST
It can spread more easily than that. The article refers to email as the main attack vector, not the only attack vector.

After all, Conficker relies on (mainly) USB sticks and exploits a hole that was supposed to be patched back in October. Yet for some odd reason it still claims large numbers of new victims every day (at least enough to keep itself in the news...)
by shellcodes_coder February 24, 2009 12:26 PM PST
Microsoft should completely disable autorun. Every time I insert my friends flash drives, I have to remove those viruses manually. Fortunately, in Vista and 7, they have taken a step forward but for a novice, it's useless
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 1:02 PM PST
In all fairness XP SP3 does ask what you want to do with an inserted mass media stick by default, and not just blindly runs it.
by Breezy1601 February 24, 2009 1:33 PM PST
IMO, ActiveX should be killed in an update. It's a POS and major security risk.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto February 24, 2009 1:54 PM PST
...it would be the last update you ever got from MSFT (Windows Update used ActiveX).

/P
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right