Protesters decry NASA hacker's extradition

Protests chant outside Britain's Home Office in support of Gary McKinnon.
(Credit: Tom Espiner/ZDNet UK)A peaceful protest supporting self-confessed NASA hacker Gary McKinnon took place this week in London.
About 35 backers showed up Tuesday in front of the Home Office to protest the extradition of McKinnon to the United States. They said he should instead be put on trial in the United Kingdom, where he lives.
McKinnon is accused of one of the biggest military hacks ever, slipping into computer systems belonging to the U.S. Army, Air Force, Department of Defense, and NASA. The U.S. government alleges that McKinnon's hacking activities caused $700,000 worth of damage. McKinnon has always maintained that his activities were harmless and that he was merely looking for evidence of UFOs.
European Court of Human Rights turned down his extradition appeal last week. If found guilty of the hacking charges in a U.S. court, McKinnon could face up to 70 years in prison under anti-terrorism laws.

Karen Todner
(Credit: Tom Espiner/ZDNet UK)Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor and a protester, said that he should at least be allowed to serve his sentence in the U.K. because of his recent diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome. Todner is preparing further appeals to the extradition.
Lucy Clarke, McKinnon's girlfriend and a protester, said he has become withdrawn following the loss of his appeal. "He's shut down," Clarke told ZDNet UK. "Gary's been living with this for six years. I'm surprised he hasn't had some kind of breakdown before now...We are very concerned about his health."
Clarke added that she hoped the U.S. would be "realistic" in sentencing McKinnon. "I want the Americans to be realistic here, a bit bloody realistic" Clarke said. "Seventy years is a joke. At the end of the day, this was a bloke on a computer. If you haven't got passwords, you're lucky that Gary wasn't a terrorist. He's always said he was wrong, but they should have had the security set up. He hasn't murdered anybody."

Lucy Clarke (left) and Janice McKinnon,
Gary McKinnon's mother
The Home Office gave an official statement to ZDNet UK about the Extradition Act 2003 and the 2003 extradition treaty between the two countries.
"These arrangements are fairly balanced, despite differences in terminology and procedures," stated a Home Office representative. "There are strong safeguards in place in the Extradition Act 2003 which ensure that the courts and the home secretary consider a number of issues, such as human rights and double jeopardy before anyone is extradited from the U.K. to the U.S."
Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.






The idiots in charge of the governments networks should be facing 70 years for gross incompetence.
They are going to be cruel, inhumane, and moralize the entire time.
The people who become prosecutors don't care about human life, only rules, and if the rule says 70 years to life for chewing gum, thats whats going to happen.
It's really a shame, and the dum@#$# who post in support of this insanity, should be shot.
where did anyone say this guy didn't break a law? Learn to read.
the guy said he was looking for UFO's, if the people INTERROGATING him don't believe a word he is saying, than beat the truth out of him. otherwise let the guy go because the taxes to feed and nurture the guy will cost a lot more than $700,000. and if we plan to lock him up and throw away the key (Guantanamo bay) the cost is more than a full trial and full 70 year prison term.
does anybody have common sense these days.
the guy said he was looking for UFO's, if the people INTERROGATING him don't believe a word he is saying, than beat the truth out of him. otherwise let the guy go because the taxes to feed and nurture the guy will cost a lot more than $700,000. and if we plan to lock him up and throw away the key (Guantanamo bay) the cost is more than a full trial and full 70 year prison term.
does anybody have common sense these days.
I should feel sorry for him? Not! He is now in jail serving 3 years as this was not his first or even second break-in. Time he learned that as an adult you are responsible for your actions.
The possibility and probability of this hacker getting a 70 year sentence are two different things. I'd bet the 70 years figure derives from the maximum sentence that is possible on account of his being prosecuted for multiple acts of hacking. This is commonly the case when someone is prosecuted for multiple acts of the same crime.
If, for example, someone is convicted of double homicide and they receive two consecutive life sentences, each of their life sentences may become 5-10 year sentences. Calm down, take a chill pill and see what happens. There's no way this guy will receive a 70 year sentence.
And for all of you blaming the government admins for this hack, yes they bear a portion of the responsibility and deserved to be punished in some way, but this isn't an either/or scenario. Just because they secured a system poorly doesn't mean it's not illegal to hack into those systems. This guy admitted to kacking into the ssytems -- he is guilty.
-Mister Winky
I'm a programmer and my company got attacked once but it was merely a page that got defaced but not hacked so no real damage. But the perception of it was SUCH A BIG DEAL to everyone, it cause everyone including me (who has nothing to do with networks) a lot of work because everybody in management had knee jerk reactions to hackers and require us to do all kinds of extra precautions for the future (i.e. work that I don't need to be doing). I'm willing to be most companies will react the same way.
This guy knew what he was doing. Part of the thrill for any hacker is to have his name in lights for a high profile company. But they also know before they begin the possibility of being caught and punished. So by initiating the hack he acknowledges the cost and accepted it. Then he went on the run so he needs to pay the price. The fact that people here are screaming murderers get less time. Well thats the problem with the law related to murderers so go fix that. This punishment fits this crime.
-
by whataboutthecheese
September 6, 2008 7:04 PM PDT
- what cost the $700,000? was that what it cost to fix what he exploited?
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
-
by The_Decider
September 7, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
- Only the US government would be so cynical to say that it is 'damage' to fix security problems.
-
-
(28 Comments)I guess those kids that exposed all the flaws in the Boston transit system did millions of dollars of damage as well.