• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
July 23, 2008 10:14 AM PDT

Gates and Bloomberg to announce $500 million anti-tobacco donation

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

Update 10:33 a.m. PST: It appears the planned announcement was in fact made around the time this item was first posted.

Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg are expected to announce Wednesday morning a $500 million donation to fight tobacco use in developing countries, according to a CNBC report.

Gates is expected to announce his contribution of $125 million over the next five years toward the project, which will address tobacco-related problems in such countries as China, India and Africa.

Global health is one of The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's focus areas.

Gates and Bloomberg are reportedly making their announcement in TheTimesCenter in New York.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Business Tech
Intel hopes 48-core chip will solve new challenges
Intel launches development kit for Atom apps
IDC: Server market shows glimmer of hope
Survey: IT's key role in global economic recovery
With an eye to the future, try raw photos today
Sun takes big fall in server market
Windows, Netbook. Android, smartbook? Hmm
IBM buys database security firm Guardium
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by TomiDee July 23, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
I am always disappointed when I read comments like "......such countries as China, India and Africa"! Elementary geography tells us that while China and India may be countries (some argue they are sub-continents), Africa is a CONTINENT which has well over 50 countries in it including South Africa, Egypt, Nigeria, Kenya and others.
Reply to this comment
by fredtheviking July 23, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
I understand that tobacco is a dangerous product, but I think more people are having trouble getting food and potable water I think that would be the sweet spot. Also programs to get world of off Oil is more useful than getting people off of tobacco. Such programs only make sense in countries where people are well feed and tobacco is the thing that will kill them. But tobacco usage has the benefit of keeping the world population in check. I don't think the problem is too many people dieing from tobacco, but too many people being born and living longer. This is putting a strain on the planet's limited resources. But I do apprienicate this goodwill gesture, bravo.
Reply to this comment
by smokinmunky July 23, 2008 11:31 AM PDT
***- Bill can't get a break from anyone. Poor guy tries to do something good for people on the planet and people still complain about it. TomiDee and fredtheviking, what have you done for poor people in africa?
I'll be willing to bet that it will be nothing compared to what Bill Gates will do in his life.
Reply to this comment
by pictureguy July 23, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
Ok, so why don't these people start helping people in OUR country, not someone elses country? Or put the money toward green energy developement. I"m sick of US citizens and the US Government giving away everything to everyone else before taking care of our own first!
Reply to this comment
by kevinmfb July 23, 2008 11:58 AM PDT
Exactly!!! I agree!
by someguy999 July 23, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
so let's see should the columnist have listed out the 50+ countries in africa (I think we all understood his intention).

Further more, different charities have different purposes. The purpose of this charity is to look at global health and development. To look beyond the US, not to say they don't do US oriented efforts as well. With China being one of the largest growing populations, I would think that education, much like we've had here, would be of value of the use of tobacco use. It was important here 15 years ago, incase anyone forgot and there was tremendous campaigns. the same goes even more so for Africa where the education system is in a terrible state of a affairs.
Reply to this comment
by ban tree huggers July 23, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
Why don't we resolve to spend these sums of money on education, feeding the poor, helping the farmers, increasing police and fire protection, fighting crime, etc. IN THE USA !
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease July 23, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
Smoking tobacco is one thing, growing it as a cash crop is another. See this link http://internationaltrade.suite101.com/article.cfm/top_ten_tobacco_countries
Reply to this comment
by MichaelJMcFadden July 24, 2008 12:01 AM PDT
People read about this $500 million dollar contribution that will take place over a period of five years and think, "Wow! Smoking's going to disappear!"

What they don't realize is just how much money has ALREADY been pumped into a campaign of social engineering that beggars anything done even under the most totalitarian regimes in history. According to the American Medical Association itself, the "Tobacco Control" effort spent over 880 million dollars just here in the United States in 2001. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/upload/mm/hod_ibot14_doc.doc And that 880 million dollar figure doesn't even cover the amount of money coming out of the pharmaceutical companies to push their NicoGummyPatchy products or the money spent on antismoking/fundraising ad campaigns by the Cancer/Heart/Lung "charities."

In the last ten years it's likely that well over ten billion dollars has been spent to demonize (Antismokers prefer the word "denormalize") smokers, pressure/encourage people to quit, raise tobacco taxes, lobby for smoking bans, and make smoking less enjoyable, more difficult, and more expensive in every way possible. While I don't have the current figures at hand, I do have a report from the CDC for the period 1990 (when taxes and bans were close to nonexistent) to 2002 (when both were VERY existent!) : BRFSS Trend Data - Data Display Comparison

Those figures show that the national rate in 1990 was 23%. And the national smoking rate 12 years later, in 2002, was 23%. *EXACTLY* the same!

The World Health Organization's total annual budget is about $1.5 billion. Think of what the World Health Organization could do with another $1.5 billion to save the millions of children dying of malaria, pneumonia, and even simple diarrhea every year if they had this money for those purposes rather than having it spent in a "War" that produces more hate than substance.

Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

advertisement

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right