July 7, 2009 8:33 AM PDT

NetApp: Our Data Domain bid remains 'superior'

by Lance Whitney
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

EMC has proven tenacious in trying to outbid NetApp in the battle to buy Data Domain. But NetApp isn't going down without a fight.

After Monday's announcement that EMC had upped its offer for Data Domain to $33.50 a share, NetApp countered with two responses, the first noncommittal but the second quite clear.

The first word from NetApp:

"In response to EMC's revised, unsolicited offer, the NetApp Board of Directors will carefully weigh its options, keeping in mind both its fiduciary duty to its stockholders and its disciplined acquisition strategy," Dan Warmenhoven, chairman and CEO of NetApp, said in a statement. "We will provide an update shortly."

That update came later Monday as NetApp affirmed its intention to acquire Data Domain, still asserting its bid as "superior." The company also announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission has declared NetApp's offer as effective, clearing the way for a shareholder vote.

Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission has granted the merger agreement early clearance. This means the FTC will not conduct any further reviews of the merger, allowing NetApp's acquistion of Data Domain to close on a timely basis if approved by stockholders.

"We are pleased to have passed these important milestones, which we believe set us on course for a clear and timely path to close," said Warmenhoven. "We continue to believe that our offer is superior to the unsolicited offer from EMC."

Data Domain's board has set up a special stockholder meeting for August 14 to vote on the merger.

The fight to own Data Domain started on May 20 with NetApp's original offer of $25 per share. In early June, EMC volleyed with a higher per-share bid.

Despite lawsuits against Data Domain over the agreement with NetApp, the two companies seemed determined to complete their deal. Now the ball is back in EMC's court.

Lance Whitney wears a few different technology hats--journalist, Web developer, and software trainer. He's a contributing editor for Microsoft TechNet Magazine and writes for other computer publications and Web sites. You can follow Lance on Twitter at @lancewhit. Lance is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and he is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Business Tech
'Don't-be-evil' Google spurns no-evil software
Mozilla pushes back Firefox 3.6, 4.0 deadlines
Flexing the boundaries of flash memory
Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
Microsoft, Intel to cede tablet market to Apple?
iPhone vs. BlackBerry in the California outback
2009 sales of Netbooks rise, but notebooks fall
Red Hat's Q3 earnings defy gravity
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Domofroggi July 7, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
I have to disagree about where the ball lies at present. The Data Domain board's fiduciary responsibility overrides the "culture compatibility" argument that favors NetApp. In today's legal environment it is hard for them to turn away a higher, all-cash offer. I would expect the Chairman to be on the phone with Warmenhoven, saying "if you want the deal to go through you have to sweeten your offer."
Reply to this comment
by longdsu July 7, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
Cash is king in a recession.......it's a no brainer to take the cash and run.
Reply to this comment
by Ronlap July 7, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
Anyone who has seen what EMC did to employee morale at VMWare would understand why DD should be bought by NetApp.
Reply to this comment
by virtman July 7, 2009 2:57 PM PDT
Do you really know what you are talking? EMC kept VMware a separate, independent company and it's still being treated as an independent company. Why are you blaming EMC for employee morale at VMware? For the record, EMC has done a good job with acquisitions. VMware, Documentum, RSA to name a few. How about NTAP? Decru, do people even remember that name? Topio, which went down the drain? Spinnaker, which took almost forever to see a release under NTAP?

I like NTAP better than EMC for a lot of reasons, but don't agree with you here. Please check the facts before you post next time.
by Maclover1 July 7, 2009 3:12 PM PDT
I regularly work with VMware employees, about half a dozen. Also my VCP training classes were given by multiple VMware employees. None of them have anything good to say about EMC.

My current sales rep for NetApp, a recent former EMC sales rep, believes that EMC will eventually sell off VMware when market penetration saturates. He said that if EMC buys a company and fully integrates it then they keep it. If they let it run on its own and keeps its name they eventually will sell it once its maxed its potential.
Reply to this comment
by Sojero July 8, 2009 4:36 PM PDT
Simple extrapolation Maclover1,

What do you expect from a former EMC sales rep now working for NetApp? Do you really think his judgment and assertions would be fair? And was he part of the senior management with some kind of insider information to have come that conclusion. The real fact of the matter is that every company has its own share of unhappy employee, whether this is an indication of a company's prevailing culture is very subjective.
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right