April 16, 2009 12:53 PM PDT

Justice Dept., Microsoft agree to extension of oversight

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

Microsoft reportedly is juggling two extensions involving its antitrust woes with regulators in the U.S. and Europe.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced Thursday that Microsoft has agreed to remain under its watch for up to another 18 months, designed to allow antitrust regulators to continue monitoring the company's efforts to share interoperability information with its rivals, who develop products that use the software giant's Windows operating system.

The Justice Department is exercising its right to extend its monitoring ability through May 12, 2011, rather than letting it expire on November 12 of this year.

According to a Justice Department statement:

The final judgment requires that Microsoft make available to competing server software developers, on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, certain technology used by Microsoft to make its server operating systems inter-operate with client PCs running the Windows operating system. Microsoft must provide licensees with technical documentation that is designed to enable them to use this technology in their own server products so that those products work better with Windows.

In past status reports, the Department reported to the court its concerns with the quality of the technical documentation Microsoft provides to licensees under this program and with the length of time it is taking Microsoft to improve the documentation.

The extension request is part of the quarterly joint-status report Microsoft and the Justice Department provide to the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. The court has the final say in signing off on the Justice Department's extension request.

Microsoft, meanwhile, reportedly gained an additional week with its deadline to respond to European antitrust regulators in their case against the software giant, according to a report in the Register.

Microsoft reportedly will now have until April 28 to respond to the European Commission, which in mid-January issued objections to the company's bundling of its browser in its operating system.

This latest extension is Microsoft's second. The previous deadline for the software giant to respond to the European Commission was April 21.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
advertisement
 
Lotus knows there's more to work than just email.
Connect with people. Get live feeds. Create widgets. Work securely online or off. Try IBM Lotus Notes.
Recent posts from Business Tech
U.S. trade agency eyes Samsung-Sharp spat
Long-awaited Bibble 5 raw photo editor arrives
Reinventing the MacBook Air
Unannounced HP 210 Netbook 'in stock'
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
'Don't-be-evil' Google spurns no-evil software
Mozilla pushes back Firefox 3.6, 4.0 deadlines
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Seaspray0 April 16, 2009 9:23 PM PDT
The EU finally noticed that microsoft bundled the browser into windows 98. It only took them 10 years.
Reply to this comment
by X-C3PO April 16, 2009 10:46 PM PDT
EU next step will ask Google to open it's search secret to compeitiors, otherwise it's not fair,,,, I guess..
Reply to this comment
by Super2online April 17, 2009 5:34 AM PDT
The EU's nest step will to be to commission a panel to study the feasability of locating more companies world wide that they can milk for more money without getting caught. This is to ensure that the blatently obvious reasons for doing all of this do not come to light.
Reply to this comment
by C_G_K April 17, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
Every windows software engineer knows that Micro$oft kept the best API's secret to give themselves a competitive advantage in software development. Finally they are being held to account. Enough is enough, these pinheads have gotten away with bloody murder for way too long. I hope they keep getting slammed.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan April 17, 2009 7:55 AM PDT
Before you start casting stones, be aware that Apple has done the very same thing themselves- even on the much vaulted iPhone itself. This isn't unusual in the industry to keep a few things proprietary or the best features for yourself.
by Commander_Spock April 17, 2009 8:41 AM PDT
Re: "[... Every windows software engineer knows that Micro$oft kept the best API's secret to give themselves a competitive advantage in software development....]"

Why didn't ya just develop your own APIs; and, Walla!

What's wrong with using your own "brain matter" to develop your own software like "Linux" -eh!
by idfubar April 26, 2009 2:03 AM PDT
The motivation for the original trial was not a question of innovation but rather allegations of abuse of monopoly power.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right