• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
March 23, 2009 5:26 PM PDT

Carbonite sues hardware maker, reseller

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 16 comments

Customers who lost data after it had failed to be backed up properly by service provider Carbonite in 2007 may have few legal remedies, a lawyer said on Monday. Meanwhile, Carbonite is suing the hardware manufacturer and reseller for charges including breach of warranty, breach of contract, fraud, and unfair and deceptive practices.

Carbonite filed a lawsuit last week against hardware maker Promise Technology and reseller Interactive Digital Systems, alleging it was sold $3 million worth of defective equipment, which affected backups of 7,500 customers.

In its lawsuit, filed in Massachusetts' Suffolk County Superior Court, Carbonite claims it lost business and that its reputation was damaged as a result of the problems.

Carbonite alleges that the Promise VTrak Raid equipment in several instances failed to recognize defects in the hard drives and transfer the data to another hard drive before the data was lost, said Thomas I. Elkind, attorney for Carbonite.

Most of the customers were able to recover their data but some were not, he said. In the meantime, he said, Carbonite has been replacing the defective hardware with systems that work properly so service is operating normally.

Joe Messina, a lawyer who represents Interactive Digital Systems, said he had not seen the lawsuit.

A Promise spokesman provided this comment: "We have looked into Carbonite's allegations and believe that they have no merit. Our investigation indicates that our products were neither implemented nor managed using industry best practices."

"I think this is more of a public relations campaign than an actual lawsuit," Messina said. "We'll respond if and when they decide to serve us the papers."

Several outside lawyers said the case will revolve around what the terms were of Carbonite's contract with Interactive Digital Systems and its warranty with Promise, details of which were scarce in the five-page lawsuit.

"Often the manufacturer says you put in a tray that was too hot or was situated magnetically in an inappropriate place. They could also say it was the (plaintiff's) environment that caused the problem or another piece of hardware and not our product," said David Steuer, of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. "Normally they settle because there are risks on both sides."

Jeff Lederman, of Winston & Strawn, took a look at the terms of use on Carbonite's Web site and said it looks like the company had attempted to shift the risk of damages from data loss to its customers, which limits the customers' ability to recover damages.

"In no event will Carbonite .... be liable ... for any lost profits, lost data, interruption of business, or other special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind... even if Carbonite has been advised of the possibility of such loss or damages," the Web site's terms of use says.

In a statement, Carbonite Chief Executive David Friend had this to say about the lawsuit: "All of the affected customers had their backups restarted immediately and automatically. A small number of these customers had their PCs crash before their restarted backups were complete. These customers were unable to restore all of their files from Carbonite. We took full responsibility for what happened, and I did my best to apologize personally to each of these customers. We addressed the technical issues that caused the above problems, and in the nearly two years since the incident, we have not encountered further problems. That said, our lawsuit seeks a refund for the defective products we were sold."

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Business Tech
Eclipse tells ex-community director to 'go away'
Practice overtaking theory in cloud computing
Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Latest Firefox beta offers file-handling feature
EC reshuffle bumps antitrust chief Kroes
HP Envy eclipses the Apple MacBook
EU hearing on Oracle-Sun set for Dec. 10
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by zkysr March 23, 2009 6:54 PM PDT
Carbonite should be ashamed of themselves.

Promise makes a good product to a certain point.

Carbonite obviously architected the infrastructure as cheap as possible and did not care about the customers interests. In my opinion they did not get anything less then they paid for but the customer did.

"Carbonite alleges that the Promise VTrak Raid equipment in several instances failed to recognize defects in the hard drives and transfer the data to another hard drive before the data was lost, said Thomas I. Elkind, attorney for Carbonite. "

What the hell is that? That should in an article of how RAID logic works on Wikipedia.

I could of set this up with about the same equipment and never had data loss. I might of had to set it up in a way that may of decreased the usable capacity and required a minimal amount of additional software or hardware, but hey it would still be lower cost than many other vendors.

This more about Carbonites greed and irresponsibility.

Where did the get the hard drives? They should sue the drive manufacturer while they are at it. Promise doesn't sell drives and integrate them like most RAID vendors. How about the "stupid" customer, sue everybody and take no responsibility.

"In no event will Carbonite .... be liable ... for any lost profits, lost data, interruption of business, or other special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind... even if Carbonite has been advised of the possibility of such loss or damages,"

Why don't they just say "we knew but screw you"?
Reply to this comment
by pmfjoe March 23, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
"In no event will Carbonite .... be liable ... for any lost profits, lost data, interruption of business, or other special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind... even if Carbonite has been advised of the possibility of such loss or damages,"

Actually I think you will find that in the terms of many companies, it is rather standard.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 March 24, 2009 4:50 AM PDT
It's also illegal. The fact is that if a business does not live up to the expectations of it.... they should be liable, unless they had the proper equipment and that equipment was defective.
Really, the courts need to make these types of codicils illegal. It's basically giving carte-blanche to the industry to screw over their customers....... and the customers then have no legal remedy whatsoever.
by sythara March 24, 2009 7:02 AM PDT
what else is new?

no, seriously?
by fgwgner March 23, 2009 7:40 PM PDT
I would never trust these people with my data backups. Just another ripoff company after your money
Reply to this comment
by pmfjoe March 24, 2009 6:27 AM PDT
Actually my experience with Carbonite has been relatively good, but you get what you pay for. For 59 or 69 dollars a year for unlimited backup space I use it as a third layer of safety and would never recommend anyone solely rely on it.
by dianibm July 25, 2009 11:10 PM PDT
I've used carbonite for years, only because I recommend it for older clients who refuse to backup on their own, many because it confuses them. So, referring them gets me so many free months, so I figured why not. Last year my subscription ran out, because I didn't refer as many people and I chose to go ahead and pay the $50, because it has come in handy so many times. I use it as an extra layer, in addition to my own backups. And when I did need to restore everything recently, I found it to be much easier to click "restore" on carbonite, than to get up and get my external hard drive over there on the shelf.

I have yet to see a problem with Carbonite, luckily, none of my clients, nor I were affected by this problem in 2007, I didn't even know about it until I read the article after the fact.

I do make sure to warn my clients that if Carbonite goes out of business or has their own crash you may lose all your data,but they take that risk, constantly promising me that they are going to use that external hd that I gave each of them, that is gathering dust in their closets. Services like Carbonite are excellent for those people that want to use their computer but not have to mess with "technical stuff".
by kieranmullen March 24, 2009 12:58 AM PDT
I purchased a Promise RAID card from newegg.com. After calling tech support found out that it did not work with ASUS motherboards in HP computers. Hmm That was not labeled anywhere. I asked what is being done? Nothing. Go contact the chip make SIIG. ??? SIIG does not deal with end users. I can understand that Promise does not take responsibility for its products first hand, they should be at least liable for the product they sold so the company can go get something that works.



KieranMullen
[CNET editor's note: Prohibited content deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 March 24, 2009 4:51 AM PDT
What? A RAID card wouldn't work with a certain motherboard? That seems kinda..... weird, considering that any PCI card is supposed to work in any motherboard that supports PCI. Same thing for PCI-X....... it's unibody, you can plug ANY card into your computer, and it should work.
by pmfjoe March 24, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
It has nothing to do with Promise, I have had the same problem with other RAID chip brands. Sometimes the system board has a on board RAID bios which has compatibility problems with certain other RAID bios' on add-on cards.
by gggg sssss March 24, 2009 3:45 PM PDT
please explain how you can have an Asus motherboard in an HP computer?
by xmazingue March 24, 2009 4:13 AM PDT
Dave Friend is one of the greatest communicator ! Whatever the news, as long as the Carbonite brand lands before people's eyes...
In the long term, too bad for him (and Carbonite's value) if customers' satisfaction is not his priority !
Unless he's ready to sell his business ????

Xavier
www.yooron.com
Reply to this comment
by jdereg March 24, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
Consider http://www.MyOtherDrive.com for online backup and file sharing.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss March 24, 2009 3:48 PM PDT
Another example of why SaaS, cloud and all similar marketing concepts is a pure rip off. Only an incompetent moron would trust any of them with their data.LOL P0rn maybe but nothing more valuable.
Reply to this comment
by CrashPlan-nl March 27, 2009 1:35 PM PDT
Conclusion: never bet on a single horse for your backup. Make backups to multiple locations.
Reply to this comment
by vchar April 1, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
Carbonite customers? data loss is not Promise?s fault. For some more context on this case, see Promise's response in a letter sent to customers this week at http://www.promise.com/support/Announcements.asp
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

advertisement

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right