March 2, 2009 12:37 PM PST

Dow Jones decline rate mimics Great Depression

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 31 comments

With the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling below the psychological watermark of 7,000 on Monday, investors may be wondering how it all stacks up against the stock market crash of the Great Depression.

It's not looking good.

In the here and now, the Dow has dropped 52.5 percent since its high of 14,279.96 on Oct. 11, 2007, to its low point of 6,779.62 during intraday trading on Monday. (Update 1:16 p.m. PST: At Monday's close it was 6,763.29, a drop of nearly 300 points from the previous close.)

And in taking a similar period of a year and five months in the late 1920s, it's a case of deja vu.

The rate of decline is mimicking that of the Dow during the Great Depression.

Back on September 3, 1929, the Dow hit a high mark of 381.17. And over a similar length of time, it fell 54.7 percent to 172.36 on January 2, 1931.

"It's very troubling if you have a mirror image," said Phil Dow, market strategist for RBC Dain Rauscher & James.

Helping to drive the Dow lower on Monday were tech titans IBM, which dropped 3.17 percent to $89.10 a share, and Hewlett-Packard which fell 3.72 percent to $27.96. Intel gave up 2.43 percent to $12.43 a share, while Microsoft gave up 1.80 percent to fall to $15.86 a share during intraday trading.

If the Dow continues to follow the rate of decline that it endured during the Great Depression, investors would have another year and four months before hitting rock bottom. Back in July 1932, the Dow fell 89 percent to 42.22 from its high.

RBC's equity strategist Dow said he believes distinctions exist between the current market malaise and that of yesteryear.

"There is an opportunity for a globally orchestrated recovery," Dow said. "This won't be the end of capitalism. At some point we'll reach the bottom in the housing market, people will start buying cars again, and inventories will be rebuilt."

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from Business Tech
Long-awaited Bibble 5 raw photo editor arrives
Reinventing the MacBook Air
Unannounced HP 210 Netbook 'in stock'
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
'Don't-be-evil' Google spurns no-evil software
Mozilla pushes back Firefox 3.6, 4.0 deadlines
Flexing the boundaries of flash memory
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by augusth March 2, 2009 1:01 PM PST
which will mean the Dow hits 1580.
Reply to this comment
by mmichaels March 2, 2009 1:15 PM PST
Hopefully we'll still have some "change we can believe in" after this thing bottoms out.
Reply to this comment
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 2:22 PM PST
"change we can believe in" - oh, pls, give me a break. what a load of horse poop. and you American's bought it - then again... who am I to talk, Aussies bought the same smelly stuff with PM Rudd.

let's get real here: the only change that you're going to be believing in is a continued loss of privacy, increase in government and continued attack on the family.

as to finances, the "change we can believe in" comes from markets adjusting for the BS. that we've been fed and correcting the massive manipulation of markets which comes with the whole greed/fear thing. it has happened numerous times before and it'll happen again when people have forgotten.

if you haven't already, sell your Hummers and wait for the bottom (that's when everyone caves in and believes it's just going to keep dropping). You can still make plenty of dough on the downside though. and if you really want to cash in, buy some good miners, buy oil and that block of land/house that some poor guy has had to sell for a tenth of it's peak price and wait.
by gerrrg March 2, 2009 1:18 PM PST
One big difference: the 1929 saw a series of one-day drops larger (as a percentage) than this current bear market.

But of course, the next level of relatively flat prices goes back to Feb-Sept 1996 when the DJI stayed within 8% (5346 and 5778). So the news can get a lot worse. ;)
Reply to this comment
by lc5150 March 2, 2009 1:24 PM PST
I didn't think the Dow would hit this low. I've still got hope that it will bounce back, but not ever to what it was before, I don't believe.
Reply to this comment
by mattumanu March 2, 2009 2:22 PM PST
Here's the thing about "Hoping IT" will bounce back... we need to stop thinking that "the Dow" is something thing with it's own mind and life. It's not. It's people, and it's people driving this drop. This is the same stupid paganized mind set that wants to objectify hurricanes (Katrina go home) and names marketing trends as if the trend itself were a living thing.

Stop thinking this way people. Start thinking like people.
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 2:55 PM PST
The Dow drop is all about "people," or more precisely one person - Obama. The inventors or "people" aren't impressed by his rhetoric. The voters were and still are, but that's not the same thing. There's no evidence that Obama's spending is directed towards anything other than earmarks and quick fixes. He might as well sell the guide to Internet Millions Secrets.
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 3:24 PM PST
come on sanenazok... now as much as I cringe whenever I see Obama and can't countenance what he stands for, it's a bit rich to blame a market correction, exacerbated by the greedy financial industry's use of synthetic securities, on a guy who's just shown up, just because he's a fraud. and unless he's truly a mastermind, he's just a puppet anyway, as all these front and center guys are. the strings have been pulled by others for a very long time - and we'll never see them in the public eye.

Next you'll be blaming him for the *coming* collapse of the fiat money system (you know the stuff they print when they don't have any real stuff). Well he's just writing cheques (checks) because he, like all the other guys who have contributed to this mess don't know what else to do - so they're doing exactly what they shouldn't be doing, which is exactly what you should be expecting of politicians (...and besides, it's the general consensus, and politicians don't go against consensus, even though consensus is another word for "the wrong decision made by a group of people who sound like they know what they're talking about but really don't). It's what makes watching them so much fun - they just need a bit more prayer that's all, and maybe they would make a few more decisions which aren't self-serving.

Not trying to pick on you buddy, but I think you're analysis of the situation needs to be a bit deeper than this.
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 4:06 PM PST
PS. can you shoot over that "Internet Millions Secrets" guide to me? now if he was selling that maybe I would be buying him...
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 6:27 PM PST
@gpenglase: fiat money isn't collapsing anytime soon. We kinda need it and needed things stick around. I blame Obama for the negative, negative market reactions. Is it a coincidence that all of his announcements are followed by market drops? Has there been a single Obama announcement to date that was met with relief by the markets?
by hendroman March 2, 2009 1:31 PM PST
quoted from above

"There is an opportunity for a globally orchestrated recovery," Dow said. "This won't be the end of capitalism. At some point we'll reach the bottom in the housing market, people will start buying cars again and inventories will be rebuilt."

the only thing is, after the great depression, we still had yet to discover the massive oil fields that we have now produced over 50% of.... less fuel to burn = less supply... and economic recovery = greater demand.... we are in for a serious re-adjustment this time around.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 1:45 PM PST
Except contrary to all environmentalists from 2004 this recession is not driven by shortage of fossil fuels. To the contrary, oil and other resources are also at low rates. What needs to change is some trust back in the financial system and an end of mark to market accounting.
by hendroman March 2, 2009 2:10 PM PST
i didn't say that this recession...Depression, was driven by shortage of fossil fuels, but as we recover we will find that the now cheap fossil fuels, due to global economic collapse and thus less demand for the time being, will again become expensive, and then much more expensive than ever before.

Do one simple search on google for "peak oil" and you will understand where these thoughts are coming from.
by myles taylor March 2, 2009 2:34 PM PST
Also we need to look to other sources for energy. The world and economy doesn't end when our oil runs out....unless we're stupid. I guess we can't completely rule that out. ;)
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 3:00 PM PST
Yes, yes, peak oil, that's around in the corner in 1975...no 1979....no 1985...no TOMORROW.
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 1:47 PM PST
This so-called analysis is just numerology- you might as well put in a reference to the year 2012 in there. Yes it's a bear market, yes there's unprecedented government spending, no the US isn't the same country it was in 1920's, no the world isn't the same it was in the 1920's.
Reply to this comment
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 2:13 PM PST
yep you keep believing that - it goes along well with the slogan "change we can believe in" and has about as much reality. markets are driven by human beings, and that's what the numbers represent - human activity. and human beings as a group don't change. i wonder if you believe this statement enough to start putting your money where your mouth is and jumping back into this market now?
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 2:34 PM PST
oh, and i gotta say... i'd be a bit more open to sudden changes buddy. 2001 took a few people by surprise, the tsunami in 2004 too - i wouldn't be so cocky about things happening that you don't expect, just because it doesn't fit into your philosophy, and you believe the world is always going to be the same. the re-establishment of the Jewish state was prophecied over 2000 years ago - the only people group/race to keep their culture after 2000 years of being scattered all over the world, and 1952 saw that come true. (scary X-files music here: do do do do do do do do)

you might want to re-evaluate a few things and stop discounting things that you have little knowledge about. if you want some "change you can believe in" maybe start looking at the things which you've "blown off" before. might take a little bit of humility and introspection though. the answers are not in the numbers though, they just are representative.
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 2:52 PM PST
It's kinda hard to have a discussion with any of the responses, but yes, @GPENGLASE I'm putting in ANOTHER 4K into the old tax-deferred IRA by April with prices so low. I stand by my comments...numerology is a waste of time. Just because using one metric the market lost the same percentage as it did during the Great Depression doesn't mean we're in one now. In fact, the economy is sound except for the screwed-up financial sector. DOO DOOO DOOO indeed.
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 3:08 PM PST
hi there sanenazok, technical analysis of markets isn't numerology.
[technical analysis] != [numerology]
{probabilities based on historical cycles of human activity (does not equal) prediction of the future using numbers}
but you don't seem to see the distinction. numerology IS a waste of time. numbers aren't - this universe runs on math formulas. seeming chaos but all rooted in order nevertheless.
as I said, don't discount what you don't understand.

personal note: good to see you putting your money where your mouth is - impressive. as they say, talk is cheep (or is that cheap).
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 3:20 PM PST
@gpenglase - it's cheap and what we have in this article does NOT approach {technical analysis}. Finding a RANDOM period and saying today's drop is the same as a RANDOM PERIOD is the epitome of numerology. It's like picking the 9th word page 29 (since today's drop is 299 points) and saying it's relevant. Technical analysis requires ANALYSIS maybe no? Picking numbers at random and drawing conclusions is actually anti-analysis.

Throwing keywords like "chaos theory" and "universe runs on numbers" isn't the same thing as proving a point. Drawing conclusions based solely on numbers is a waste of time. It's a bear market, get used to it, at least until the administration changes its tune or actually does something worthwhile (unlikely).
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 3:53 PM PST
Wow, sanenazok. I didn't think I'd be having this argument nowadays. I mean the whole "fundamentals vs technical analysis" argument was done and dusted decades ago.

But my point stands - maybe not so much directed to you, as just a general comment: two things that bug me, is
(1) people believing that their generation has all the answers to God, the Universe and everything (the answer of course, which those among us who are enlightened enough know, is 42) - I wonder, in the next couple of hundred years, who and what will have replaced Darwin's *theory* of evolution as the 'truth of the moment' , and
(2) people spouting on about human's getting better, gooder (sorry 'bout the grammar), wiser, smarter, hairier {ok so I'm follicly-challenged}. Sorry, but in general the human race remains the same. The Sumerians probably knew more than we do about how everything works - we still don't know stuff that they did, but human nature remains the same, and we still all see the world and other realms 'as through a glass darkly' (simply put, like teenagers, we think we know everything, but we don't have a clue).
(3) and a bonus one... and the point I was trying to make before. we expect everything to remain the same, until it changes. humans, by nature don't want to change, don't like to change, and tend to strongly resist it, often to their own serious detriment. we love holding onto stuff, even if it's killing us or stopping us from being who and what we're meant to be. we therefore don't look for, or welcome the unexpected, and have a mindset that get's surprised by it, even though the unexpected happens around us all the time - recently we've had a taste, but there's are a few unexpected happenings that are going to shock the pants off people not too far away. both natural and man-made occurrences. eg. (a) I wouldn't be owning too much property in LA, nor beach front property anywhere and (b) if you've got children I'd suggest you edumacate them on their WW1 and WW2 history, because with all this talk about peace it's giving me a real funny feeling.
by sanenazok March 2, 2009 6:23 PM PST
@gpenglase: I think we're talking about two different things - I think the "analysis" of the article is nothing more than numerology. You are referring to some great debate called "fundamentals vs technical analysis." Huh??? My position isn't that the article represents "fundamentals," further it doesn't contain any "technical analysis." It attempts to draw conclusions based on the pattern of market volatility now and during the great depression. Your other points are directed at something else altogether, but I'll address them.
(1) "Having all the answers" isn't necessary to get the US out of a recession. Low taxes, and restoration of confidence in the financial sectors are.
(2) Sumerians knew squat. Their achievements are limited to building giant staircases to nowhere (zigurrats)that did nothing other than keep astrologers in a dominant position.
(3) I personally like change. I've changed careers twice, move every few years. Oh and don't get me started on the floozies.

Now I have a bonus for you...deep breaths 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. The world isn't coming to an end, regardless of what the "analysis" of the article states, but you should feel free to believe whatever you want. Ciao.
by jeph4e March 2, 2009 2:09 PM PST
Yep. Change is all we'll have left.
Reply to this comment
by gpenglase March 2, 2009 2:40 PM PST
haha. love it :-D
by pugster March 2, 2009 3:47 PM PST
Nasdaq was over 5000 at 2001. Now it would be nice if it is over 2000.
Reply to this comment
by March 2, 2009 7:46 PM PST
If these posts prove anything then it is that signs of great instability/volatility tend to produce fatalism and extremism amongst the general populace and this reaction probably correlates far more closely to the "great depression" than any analysis of changing stock index valuations from the past and present. Mass fear and irrationality are gaining momentum as the future becomes just a bit more elusive again for once.

The demise of the world has been predicted far too many times throughout history, especially within the first centuries following Christianity's birth. Every time a great fear swept through the population in which normal time stopped only later to be exposed as a fallacy after predictions failed to materialize. Unfortunately, little is ever learned from these movements allowing them to recur at a later point in time, probably because we're all so embarrassed by our gullibility.

Regardless, no one knows exactly what will happen ... this is one of those periods in history when life appears unpredictable and we must step back into reality and see modern society as the safety net, which sadly cannot always support us, but has done a consistent job for some time now. When it fails we must and will deal with reality just as we have for thousands of years.
Reply to this comment
by gpenglase March 3, 2009 5:29 PM PST
no tag line. someone who doesn't want to be identified? hmm.

and what's the point of this comment? That Christianity is wrong and has always led us astray?, but 'modern society' a.k.a. 'trusting in our own strength', while not perfect has consistently 'been there for us'? What a load of BS.

While it is true that no-one knows exactly what will happen, let me give you another version, less fatalistic and more rooted in truth.

History is a good signpost to the future. Humans as a group, don't change, have been and are driven by the same things from the beginning until the end. We can see patterns repeat. And this pattern is very similar to the Depression. And this Greater Depression we are entering can be charted accordingly.

In periods like this some turn to sleflessness and community-mindedness, and others remain selfish. In times of desperation Christians have always been the predominant group to selflessly aid and assist those in need - it is a historical fact that during times of crisis Christians have given, done and sacrificed more for the good of their neighbour - it is a fundamental tenet of their faith.

Even Athiests such as Niall Ferguson, professor of history at Harvard University, recognise that Christianity is good for 'social cohesion' (so he sends his kids to a Christian school), and Atheistic libertarian, Walter Block, argues that Christianity has been the strongest foe to murderous statist tyranny. (Which is the point - that's what you have signed yourselves for with King Obama - ironic that a black president that promotes these death issues - if not just the unborn, but other 'less desirables' in society, according to the eugenics (a US idea which the Nazis made a nationalised policy.)

Back in 1899 James Dennis wrote "Christian Missions and Social Progress" (1200+ pages). In it he said: ?Missionary effort has a sociological sphere to fill as well as an evangelistic. It has necessarily to come into contact with corrupt social customs, non-Christian practices, barbaric ideals, and a complex heathen environment. . . . It therefore becomes clear that the mission of Christianity is to transform and elevate man, as well in his associate relationships as in his individual life..."

More recently has been the monumental work of Yale historian Kenneth Scott Latourette (1884-1968). He wrote extensively on the history and spread of Christianity around the world, and on its social impact. He makes it perfectly clear that Christianity has had a tremendous social, intellectual, political, cultural, educational and artistic impact wherever it was spread.

All this is simply the matter of historical record. Yet when one encounters the works of the new atheists, a completely different picture is presented. Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens et. al., want to convince us that religion in general and Christianity in particular are utterly harmful and disadvantageous.

However there are some that aren't so quick to ignore centuries of documented evidence about the benefits of Christianity during social devastation. One such atheist is Matthew Parris. Writing in the Timesonline last December, his piece began with the provocative title, ?As an atheist, I truly believe Africa needs God?.

He writes ?It inspired me, renewing my flagging faith in development charities. But travelling in Malawi refreshed another belief, too: one I?ve been trying to banish all my life, but an observation I?ve been unable to avoid since my African childhood. It confounds my ideological beliefs, stubbornly refuses to fit my world view, and has embarrassed my growing belief that there is no God. Now a confirmed atheist, I?ve become convinced of the enormous contribution that Christian evangelism makes in Africa: sharply distinct from the work of secular NGOs...?

He realises that this is not just about doing good works, but the faith which lies behind the charitable deeds and
he reminisces... "The Christians were always different. Far from having cowed or confined its converts, their faith appeared to have liberated and relaxed them. There was a liveliness, a curiosity, an engagement with the world - a directness in their dealings with others - that seemed to be missing in traditional African life. They stood tall.?

So... while I could go on, you get the gist.
It's actually during times like this that the fabric of 'modern society' comes undone. Not saving us but failing us. And it's times like these that your best friend can be a Christian who genuinely cares for you.

Now, about what lies ahead. Struggle yes, but through it all comes an opportunity to return from a focus on oneself, on greed and materialistic and hedonistic pursuits, to the things that matter. Faith, family, friends, fun and fulfilling lives, not empty, full of ambition and greed and lust.

If you have any doubts about this why don't you pop over to www.billmuehlenberg.com and check it out for yourself.
by RandySmithKatyTexas March 2, 2009 11:56 PM PST
The White House forgets how simple the solution is. I trust President BO. We have a few things in common. No it?s not that I?m black man. It?s that I have children the same age as his. I know that as a Father you want to leave behind a better and safer world. So he will do what is best for his family and country and will not sell out. Back to my point of story. We are being giving the biggest opportunity to become the NATIONS GREATEST GENERATION and pull us out of this turmoil. We cut some of these big govt. agencies .. FEMA for one.

Then to open SBA loans to the 100,000?s of people who can provide a business plan that shows how they will make money and what you will reinvest that money to grow our country.
This will create a confident consumer and even jobs. I just wonder why they don?t try and don?t listen to the common man. DELL and MICRSOFT were small business that are now today?s leaders. We need more SBA loans NOW! And the small business owners will carry us out of this mess and history will call us the Best Generation!
Reply to this comment
by MSFTW March 5, 2009 9:36 AM PST
I did not evan read this artical just the comments its very interesting to see everyones point of view i personally do not support articals like this one seeing how media is having a huge impact on the economic situation i believe. its human nature to expect the worst. in my opinion this is whats wrong with sociaty we are so wrapped up in money and we are all just a bunch of greedy sob's let this thing ride out and countinue living ur life as you were .
Reply to this comment
by wolfie11709 March 5, 2009 1:39 PM PST
What ever happened to banks offering 7% interest on savings accounts? Then, seems we went to CDs, then so many decided to play the stock market. Well, just how low can the Dow go? What can we do to help our economy, as the little folks? How about, trying to buy from local retailers a wee bit more?, buy "Made in America" items, if they can be found. The creation of solar and wind power infrastructure, green housing, will help create American jobs, have faith. These are the industries of the future, that can not be outsourced! The big companies failing, will allow the smaller companies to bloom. Yes, all know of the greed and graft of the powerful "Good Ole Boys", and their cronies, the handwriting is on the wall, the internet has made damaging information available to all around the world. We will all need to learn to live more sustainably, gently, and efficiently. The media has infested our morals with laziness and unrealistic, shallow desires. Have we become so numbed and bored to life that we live through reality shows? Do kids ride their bikes after school, or wander aimlessly through the alleys of Facebook, YouTube, etc.? Who knows, maybe dropping by the neighbors for a cup of coffee, will become more fashionable, instead of hiding in our homes on the internet 24/7.
Reply to this comment
(31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right