• On The Insider: Will the Jacksons Perform Concert Dates?
December 4, 2008 3:12 PM PST

Google weasels out of uptime promise? Not so fast

by Stephen Shankland

Correction, 4:05 p.m. PST: The name of the senior product manager for Google Apps was misspelled. It is Rajen Sheth. Also, Pingdom had an incorrect number for total downtime in its "more likely" scenario. It is 55 minutes.

Google's SLA loophole?

Pingdom argues Google can get away with more outages because smaller ones fall between the service level agreement gaps.

(Credit: Pingdom)

Pingdom, a company that monitors Web site availability, has concluded that Google gives itself a lot of wiggle room in its service level agreement for its Google Apps service.

The service level agreement (SLA) gives credit to paying customers if the service falls short of promised availability--99.9 percent measured monthly for Google Apps. Pingdom points out that because Google only counts downtime periods that last at least 10 minutes, the company could get away with intermittent problems that are shorter.

"What if Google Apps was down for 9 minutes, up for 1 minute, down 9 minutes, etc.? That would mean 54 minutes of downtime each hour, but Google still wouldn't count it because none of the individual downtimes lasted 10 minutes (or) more," according to a blog entry Thursday. In a "more likely" scenario with outages lasting 3, 8, 12, 5, 9, 14, and 4 minutes, the total of 55 minutes of actual downtime would only be counted as 26 minutes for purposes of the SLA.

Google, while concerned about uptime, isn't as concerned about the SLA terms or what it called Pingdom's "hypothetical scenario," though.

"If you look at our SLA and compare to others' in the industry, it's identical," said Rajen Sheth, senior product manager for Google Apps, pointing as an example to Microsoft's hosted Exchange service. Service providers need to set a threshold somewhere "to distinguish between a real outage and intermittent errors," he said, and Google is trying to be transparent about where it sets its.

That may sound like dodging the question about an accumulation of small outages, but the company does have a point that a blip probably shouldn't count as much as a catastrophe. Realistically, shortening the interval would probably squeeze Google on the other end to lower its 99.9 percent uptime commitment or perhaps raise its $50 per user per year price. There's no free lunch here for customers.

And after all, although SLAs are important, customers will rapidly abandon ship if a service breaks, credit or no credit.

Notably, Google monitors not only each customer account's uptime, but also each user of that account. It also gives credits even if only part of the service goes down while other parts are available, Sheth said. And though only some customers were affected by a significant Gmail outage in August, Google offered SLA credits to all Google Apps customers.

Google has promised a better dashboard to inform customers about outages. "During the times when we've seen outages, the No. 1 thing we need to do is communicate with our customers," Sheth said.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Business Tech
EMC raises bid for Data Domain
Week in review: A speedier new Firefox
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Linux community codes around Microsoft's FAT patents
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Cisco guns for Microsoft in collaboration market
Forrester: Tech recovery to start in fourth quarter
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by bonesbautista December 4, 2008 6:30 PM PST
Whatever, Google. It's not just the outages - notifications that the server isn't available, the password's incorrect don't count? <Rant> Daily issues and failures today and every day this and last week for my Premier accounts finally did it for me.

I can see owners of free accounts not having too much of a legit gripe, but I bought into it. Great spam filters just don't cut it for me anymore. </Rant>
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 4, 2008 7:34 PM PST
I heard they are cutting back on bean-bag chairs , dry cleaning , and child care service.
Oh , the humanity !
Reply to this comment
by honorable1 December 5, 2008 10:14 AM PST
Google, please dry up and go away.
Reply to this comment
by jeffyablon December 5, 2008 11:23 AM PST
SLAs . . . one of my favorite topics. Kinda like when an OCR program claims to have 99.9% accuracy. Well, that's one error in each 1000 characters, or two per page. Lotta editing time FINDING those!

I advice my ISP clients that they shouldn't give customers an SLA, and instead explain how silly they are and that their intent is to honor their commitments, instead.

Are you listening, Google?

Jeff Yablon
President & CEO
<a href="http://answerguy.com">Virtual VIP</a>
Reply to this comment
by davelaurello December 9, 2008 10:31 AM PST
From the customers? point of view, what is the difference between a ?real outage and intermittent errors?" Their service is down either way. If this discussion illustrates one thing, it?s that availability is an illusive pursuit that very few IT service providers ? internal or outsourced ? or technology suppliers do well ? claims to the contrary notwithstanding. As a consequence, the companies that make up our industry are working hard to dumb down discourse on the subject and to set service expectations below what customers have a right to expect. The assertion that one provider?s SLA is identical to others? in the industry is an only excuse for keeping the bar low, or dodging the fact that they are ill prepared to deliver what they claim they can with their current solution. Either way, the customer loses out. If we had conducted our relationship with customers in such a fashion instead of committing to five nines availability -- no ifs, ands or buts -- Stratus Technologies would have been out of business long ago.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Look before leaping to short URLs

Fueled by Twitter's rise, services that scrunch Web addresses are taking off. They bring a host of problems, but some are working to fix them.

In Utah desert, it's bombs away

road trip At the massive Utah Test & Training Range, the Air Force runs 15,000 sorties a year to ensure that pilots and weapons are on the mark.
• Photos: Training and testing

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right