• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
November 28, 2008 4:30 PM PST

How Microsoft plans to make its mark in CRM

by Colin Barker
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

q&a Microsoft Dynamics CRM has become a key product for the company, according to CRM division general manager Brad Wilson--and it's an area the software maker plans to invest in further.

According to Wilson, when Microsoft earlier this year committed itself to investing $1 billion annually in the construction of new data centers to support the Microsoft Live portfolio of on-demand software, some of that sum--he declined to specify how much--was earmarked for customer relationship management.

Brad Wilson

Brad Wilson is CRM division general manager at Microsoft.

(Credit: Microsoft )

Earlier this month, CNET News sister site ZDNet UK spoke to Wilson to find out how he intends to make that CRM investment and whether he thinks it will be sufficient to beat on-demand CRM leader Salesforce.com on its own turf. Wilson made it plain that, despite the SME (small and medium enterprise) bias that Microsoft CRM may have acquired, it is equally aimed at the enterprise.

Q: Microsoft has been in CRM for some time, but just how long?
Wilson: We've been in the CRM market for five and a half years, and have more than 16,000 CRM customers and more than 750,000 users.

Microsoft is investing more annually on data centers than the complete revenue of all the on-demand players--$1 billion annually. As a company, we are investing heavily.

How is that customer base made up?
Wilson: More than half of the business is international--outside the U.S.--and, although we started out as an organization focused mainly on the small and medium-sized businesses, more than half of our revenue now comes from large enterprises.

Salesforce.com is very popular, so how do you compete with it?
Wilson: We do and we have people who switch from Salesforce.com fairly routinely. But there are a number of companies that compete in this space and everyone wins some and everyone loses some.

What I like about our strategy is that Salesforce.com has a single operating model, which is that you rent it from them forever. Our software comes with a choice of either having an on-demand subscription offering or buying the software. If you talk to analysts today, they will tell you that, of all the CRM in use throughout the world, probably about 90 percent is deployed on the premises.

We want to give our customers the choice. Whether you want to go on-premises or to a cloud-based offering, the choice is yours.

Does this mean you don't find the cloud particularly valid?
Wilson: It is not so much that--and this is a somewhat controversial view--but I don't really care. I have an agnostic model: if you want to buy the CRM software, great; if you want to go ahead with on-demand, that's also great.

For us, it is a single codebase. It's literally the same software running.

There is no difference between on-premise or on the network. The only difference is how long your network cable is. I think sometimes people get too caught up in it. The world is not really binary.

What new products are coming up?
Wilson: About 11 months ago, we shipped our CRM 4.0, which is a fully multi-tenanted system that you can deploy from outside the cloud.

What we announced (earlier this month) is a new set of accelerators for CRM 4.0 (on sale December 1). These are extensions to the core system so that, when you add them to CRM 4.0, they offer capabilities such as e-service for handling Web cases. This lets customers submit cases online and check things such as status very easily.

What do you mean exactly by "cases"?
Wilson: Well, if you have a broken fridge and you want to contact the retailer or manufacturer, then you can go to the Web site and that will submit information that will flow into the CRM system and then trigger a workflow.

So e-service is really that Web interface to customer services, as opposed to the call center. What we provide is the data and the workflow to support e-service scenarios.

Another one is extended sales forecasting, which is a way to lock and manage forecasts that goes deeper than the usual sales-automation facilities.

There are new analytics in business intelligence; sales methodologies. And then there is enterprise search integration through SharePoint.

But are these new?
Wilson: We talked about them at our partner conference back in July in Houston but...we haven't had a customer launch before (this month).

So presumably these are intended to deal with the view that Microsoft has not been in the CRM market very long and that, to understand and execute sophisticated CRM, you need a specialist supplier?
Wilson: The wildly less popular ones? The ones that have had staggering adoption problems over the past 10 years? I think there is really a philosophical difference (between Microsoft and those suppliers). We are not going to give you a gigantic list of features. You know how you want to run your business.

So, for us, user adoption is key. If they (the users) are not going to use the system, you are pretty much guaranteed a failed deployment.

We give you enough flexibility so that you can run the system how you want to. So I find we will beat a classic offering from your CRM vendors on end-user adoption and platform flexibility. Those factors will far outweigh the fact that other people have more prebuilt stuff.

We went into a sales opportunity against a classic CRM vendor and measured its software. Out of the box, its software had only a 7 percent fit (only 7 percent of the software could be run without modification).

When you think about it, it is very difficult to sit in Palo Alto...and design something that is going to fit any business--a system that will work with every business in the world, whether it is in Turkey or South Africa. So the key now is flexibility. How easy is it to add the stuff we need?

I think the old model of 10 years ago, where you built a system that had a big slab of stuff that you had to adopt, has gone.

At the same time, we will still bring out our accelerators with pre-packaged software, and more and more of them. But we release them as open source. The idea is that we just put this stuff out there and let people use it. And, if our partners use it, all the better.

So are these products free?
Wilson: Yes.

But you are charging people for the software.
Wilson: You have to buy the core license but, once you have bought it, we are not going to try and nickel and dime people for bits of process and functionality. We don't believe in that.

We are taking the approach of wanting to make CRM much more affordable. Affordable in terms of TCO (total cost of ownership).

Part of that is in the core. We think we've done a pretty good job there and we keep adding pieces of incremental value through the accelerators. Even in the on-demand space, we want to go in and make it more affordable. CRM in on-demand tends to be relatively overpriced. So we want to make that price come down.

How do you charge? It is on a license basis?
Wilson: We have a server price and a user price--what we call a server license and a client-access license. The server price is nominal, relatively low and doesn't tend to go up. The primary driver of price is how many people use it.

Colin Barker of ZDNet UK reported from London.

Recent posts from Business Tech
Week in review: Pre-holiday buying spree
$1.25 billion later, can AMD take business from Intel?
Google says Docs to catch up to Office next year
Intel hires antitrust expert as new top lawyer
What Intel just bought for $1.25 billion: Less risk
AMD-Intel deal: No big change for consumers
Intel to pay AMD $1.25 billion in antitrust settlement
Google hopes Go will give a browser boost
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by hhandyman November 28, 2008 6:09 PM PST
With all the good free software why pay per use or keep your data so prone to attack on a remote server even if its across the street to large a chance your personal information will be accessed by the genearal public or thru search and seasure methods of government the Citizens employee and the intent misunderstood or goals taken out of context or investments ideas lost advantages to the data thhief..
you could use suns Free suits and do everyting you pay Microsoft Premium prices.

Flat file systems can be made and used to reaonsable success with no excessive overhead and limited big brother Waatch affects.
Reply to this comment
by jessiethe3rd November 29, 2008 8:47 AM PST
free software sucks at integrating. free software is not supported for free. free software's UI usually sucks. Microsoft offers both a hosted solution and a solution you manage internally through IT. Both solutions leverage industry standards, can be integrated easily with backend systems,and lastly they work with the tools 98% of sales people are already using - Office. Business is not looking for free software - they are looking for standardize that are easy to support because in the long haul business spend 80% of it's IT budget managing assets and 20% implementing new technologies.
by Earl Benzar November 28, 2008 10:27 PM PST
Why is it that Microsoft believes they have to own every tech market sector out there? I'm sick of them. Sorry, I'll stay with Salesforce.com
Reply to this comment
by jessiethe3rd November 29, 2008 8:45 AM PST
They won't stop because they are a company... that's what companies do - consolidate and take over as much as possible. duh
by shelby_sf December 1, 2008 6:45 AM PST
Its called business. Grow or die. Its not about MSFT bashing. It's about the product. If you like it, buy it. Or don't.
by Vegaman_Dan November 30, 2008 6:47 PM PST
I'm not surprised that MIcrosoft would say they can do what they claim- that's what every company says. No company would come out and announce that they can't do what they are bragging about.

That said, how much competition is there? Salesforce, Microsoft... who else?
Reply to this comment
by SebastiaanB December 1, 2008 5:47 AM PST
SAP has a new CRM offering for the SME. It is called SAP CRM Business all-in-one. It is based on their flagship CRM application CRM2007 but with a limited scope and starting at a competitive price, 9.900 euro. We have chosen this solution over salesforce.com (more expensive) and Microsoft (no strategy to scale the system).
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight December 1, 2008 7:23 AM PST
Crappy CRM is why I don't buy MicroSoft. Either they don't use their own great software or worse, they do.
Reply to this comment
by jypeterson December 1, 2008 7:51 AM PST
SAP's new CRM offering is based off of Outlooksoft's CPM (aquired by SAP last year). We currently are using CPM internally, and it is a very robust and flexible system. It was initially designed for manufacturing and sales, but we have found it to work in heathcare very well.

We will likely upgrade to CRM in the next 12 - 18 months. We are looking forward to some of the new features with regards to interfacing with our organizations overall BI and data warehousing projects to consolidate corporate data.

I cannot imagine using MS as our CRM manager. The relationships that we have with our vendor and support is very close, and I do not think that MS would understand healthcare like our current vendor.
Reply to this comment
by rockytop985 December 4, 2008 1:31 PM PST
Actually, SAP's new CRM offering is NOT based on anything from Outlooksoft. You are mixing apples and oranges, which is very easy to do in the SAP world. The latest release of SAP CRM All-in-One represents a radically enhanced user interface, to put it on par with the leading CRM offerings. The underlying architecture is based on the same infrastructure (Netweaver) that SAP has used for years. More likely than not, SAP CRM is meant for existing or new SAP customers who desire an SAP ERP backend solution. I have seen very little competition between MS CRM and SAP CRM. In the few cases I have, it has been a matter of quick contact management and sales activity recording, with little to no thought regarding backend integration (i.e. 360-degree view of the customer).

SAP rebranded Outlooksoft "SAP Business Planning and Consolidation", for managing critical financial and operational planning, budgeting, reporting, and analytic requirements. It in no way represents any customer relationship management functionality.
by s.ge December 9, 2008 5:43 PM PST
SharePoint is the great platform for enterprise document management and collaboration, and the integration application on SharePoint lets organisations to keep IT platform up with their business development and requirement in the future.

For more information about SharePoint integration, you can visit nsynergy.com.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right