• On The Insider: Bruno Film Edited Due to Jackson's Death
November 20, 2008 12:30 AM PST

Samsung launches 256GB solid-state drive

by Brooke Crothers

Samsung on Wednesday night said it has begun mass-producing 256GB solid-state drives. This size tops the largest-capacity SSDs found in laptops today.

Samsung currently offers 64GB and 128GB SSDs for laptops.

The new 256GB drives are faster too, the company claims, more than doubling the performance rate of Samsung 64GB and 128GB SSDs.

The drives combine sequential read rates of 220 megabytes per second, with sequential write rates of 200MBps. "This sharply narrows the performance gap between read and write operations to only 10 percent, compared to a read-write speed difference of between 20 (percent) and 70 percent for other SSDs," the company said.

Samsung did not mention random write performance, however. Despite being generally faster than hard-disk drives (particularly at reading data), solid-state drives fall short of hard disks when they randomly write data. Random writes are generally considered to be the Achilles' heel of solid-state drives.

Getting this 256GB SSD in a notebook "is analogous to having a 15,000-(revolutions-per-minute) drive, without all of its size, noise, power, and heating drawbacks," Jim Elliott, vice president of memory marketing at Samsung Semiconductor, said in a statement.

The 256GB SSD boosts data transfer when large multimedia files are simultaneously read and stored. "It can store 25 high-definition movies in just 21 minutes, a significant advancement over a 7,200rpm hard disk drive (HDD), which takes about 70 minutes," the company said in a statement.

The drive's performance is derived from a new single-platform design consisting of a chip controller, NAND flash, and special drive firmware developed by Samsung. "This single platform is designed to easily adapt to Samsung's 40-(nanometer) class NAND flash memory," according to the company.

It consumes 1.1 watts of power, versus 2 or more watts for a comparable HDD. Similar in weight to a 128GB SSD, at 81 grams, the 2.5-inch multilevel cell 256GB SSD has the same 9.5-millimeter drive thickness.

Samsung's 256GB SSD is also available with optional proprietary encryption programming that provides full-disk encryption, a key feature for some corporate users.

Pricing was not immediately available.

Originally posted at Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Brooke Crothers is a former editor at large at CNET News.com, and has been an editor for the Asian weekly version of the Wall Street Journal. He writes for the CNET Blog Network, and is not a current employee of CNET. Contact him at mbcrothers@gmail.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Business Tech
Week in review: A speedier new Firefox
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Linux community codes around Microsoft's FAT patents
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Cisco guns for Microsoft in collaboration market
Forrester: Tech recovery to start in fourth quarter
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
OLPC operating system free on a stick
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by pase121 November 20, 2008 1:07 AM PST
SRP 2 million dollars!
Reply to this comment
by CHRlSCO November 20, 2008 1:53 AM PST
Why do you guys talk about sequential writes. What matters more is non-sequential writes.
Reply to this comment
by texaslabrat November 20, 2008 3:03 PM PST
agree. And it looks like Sandisk, for one, has been working on that issue: http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_SanDisk_Deploys_ExtremeFFS_For_Accelerated_SSD_Random_Write_Speeds_28385.html

"In 2009, SanDisk will begin deploying flash management systems capable of accelerating SSD random write speeds by up to 100 times compared to the technology we have today, the company revealed this week during the WinHEC conference held in Los Angeles."
by gerrrg November 20, 2008 4:14 AM PST
Eventually, SSDs will replace hard drives in servers...but first, the workstations.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider November 20, 2008 7:40 AM PST
Not until the limited write problem is fixed. A busy server could destroy a SSD in a matter of weeks.
by texaslabrat November 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST
@The_Decider:

The limited write issue has been basically solved with improved manufacturing and smarter wear-leveling algorithms. There are server-certified SSD's available today. They tend to be quite a bit more expensive as they use SLC rather than the cheaper MLC tech..but they generally carry a 5-yr warranty explicitly for server use. Even the MLC drives have pretty reasonable write cycles these days...more than enough for the average consumer, anyway...and approaching what a "light-duty" server would need.
by Mr. Dee November 20, 2008 4:50 AM PST
Hmm, thats bigger than my 160 GB mechanical hard disk in my laptop. Still, its the issue of the mechanical hard disk being 1 step ahead of the SSD for a few years to come. Yes, I can get this SSD for huge sum of money, but I can get a cheaper 320 GB HD.
Reply to this comment
by alan_06 November 20, 2008 7:45 AM PST
Awesome innovation! I'm looking forward to lightweight smaller laptop form factor
Reply to this comment
by knowles2 November 20, 2008 10:07 AM PST
So let get down to the thing that matter, the price, how much is this thing gonna cost us.
Reply to this comment
by Henry Michael Karshis November 20, 2008 10:50 AM PST
I'm waiting for this puppy to support USB 3.0 as portable drive!

HMK
Reply to this comment
by humanssssss November 20, 2008 12:02 PM PST
How much?
Reply to this comment
by JoshMiller79 November 20, 2008 12:06 PM PST
Don't these things fail reasonably quickly due to limited read/write cycles?

solid State is great for my thumb drive with it's handful of "currently working on but still backed up" documents but I wouldn't want to store my music/movie collection on one.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ November 20, 2008 12:27 PM PST
no, thats become a non-issue now that the MTFB is near or better than hard drives.
by Renegade Knight November 21, 2008 11:35 AM PST
Yes. The solution seems to be "wear-leveling" which has me wondering if that's a fancy way to say "forced fragmentation".
by Renegade Knight November 21, 2008 11:35 AM PST
Yes. The solution seems to be "wear-leveling" which has me wondering if that's a fancy way to say "forced fragmentation".

That may or may not mean anything with one of these drives.
by thelemurking November 20, 2008 12:49 PM PST
I'm willing to beta test one of these drives in my laptop if Samsung is willing to send me one... and I promise not to download any porn! ;)
Reply to this comment
by renGek November 20, 2008 1:00 PM PST
Its going to be verrrry expensive. Not only that but HD makers want you to buy ssd because they can make more money off of it than the traditional drives now. Drive makers are going to start ignoring traditional drives fairly soon especially in this economy. Of course in this economy, who the heck is going to spend $600+ on an SSD drive (only guessing on the price so don't jump on me about it).
Reply to this comment
by dirty55409 November 20, 2008 5:56 PM PST
Try dropping your 1tb barracuda HDD from 4 ft off the ground.... now try it with a SSD. That's what you're getting from shelling out for a SSD. Faster Reads(but with slower writes) is also a benefit for SSD
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break November 21, 2008 7:06 PM PST
Then DON'T DROP that HDD! Seems like a simple enough concept.
by Mikeybabes November 20, 2008 6:21 PM PST
Getting this 256GB SSD in a notebook "is analogous to having a 15,000-(revolutions-per-minute) drive, without all of its size, noise, power, and heating drawbacks," Jim Elliott, vice president of memory marketing at Samsung Semiconductor, said in a statement.

I thought Tomshardware busted the myth that SSDs consume less power overall, in that they draw power continuously.
Reply to this comment
by dirty55409 November 20, 2008 6:35 PM PST
where/when was that statement made? I would just look at his title "Memory Marketing" so ummm when was the last time you were pitched a sale that was false? He gets paid to move product not to tell the truth. So yeah.
by iff2mastamatt November 21, 2008 11:58 AM PST
I think the SSD's need a little bit more time to perfect before they can replace HD's. At least Samsung and Sandisk are diligent with their progress.
Reply to this comment
by SystemsJunky November 21, 2008 3:47 PM PST
If you want a fast Laptop HDD, get a 360gb VelociRaptor.
Reply to this comment
by Rants&Raves December 17, 2008 8:41 PM PST
Agreed, the VelociRaptor is amazing. But it'll also eat your batteries like nothing else.
by billwklein November 24, 2008 9:04 AM PST
What is funny is that this is two drives configured into a RAID 0 configuration crammed into one enclosure... Its creative, but hardly good technology.
Reply to this comment
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right