• On TV.com: Sexy summer bodies photo gallery
September 3, 2008 7:26 AM PDT

'Happy Birthday to GNU' marks 25 years

by Tom Espiner

The GNU mascot

(Credit: GNU.org)

The Free Software Foundation has released Happy Birthday to GNU to celebrate the silver anniversary of the operating system.

The film, presented by actor/comedian Stephen Fry, offers a basic history of GNU's Not Unix (GNU). Fry describes how Richard Stallman announced a plan in September 1983 to develop a free-software, Unix-like operating system called GNU, and adds that the Linux kernel was re-released under the GNU General Public License in 1992. The GNU/Linux combination provided the first completely nonproprietary way for people to run a PC.

Peter Brown, the Free Software Foundation's executive director, said the video should act not only as a reminder of GNU's history but as a "rallying call for the work that still needs to be done."

"We intend for the 25th anniversary to be more than just a reflection on the history of the free-software movement. Because, despite all of the success brought about by the GNU system and other free-software projects, we still need a determined effort to replace or eliminate the proprietary applications, platforms, drivers and firmware that many users still run," Brown said in a statement.

What do you get an operating system that has everything? How about GNU's official stuffed gnu?

(Credit: GNU.org)

The foundation plans further releases as part of the monthlong anniversary celebrations, with announcements timed for Software Freedom Day on 20 September and for the GNU anniversary itself on September 27.

In the video, available for download at GNU.org, Fry says that proprietary operating systems are akin to "bad science," as unofficial modifications to the operating system are prohibited.

"You can't really fiddle with your operating system, and you certainly can't share any ideas you have about your operating system with other people, because Apple and Microsoft, who run the two most popular operating systems, are very firm about the fact that they own that," Fry says.

The actor goes on to say that, for many people, it is natural not to be able to make modifications, but Fry asks why making modifications should be illegal.

"All knowledge is free and all knowledge is shared in good science. If it isn't, it's bad science, and really a kind of tyranny," he says.

Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.

Recent posts from Business Tech
Week in review: A speedier new Firefox
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Linux community codes around Microsoft's FAT patents
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Cisco guns for Microsoft in collaboration market
Forrester: Tech recovery to start in fourth quarter
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
OLPC operating system free on a stick
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by giant_david September 3, 2008 7:57 AM PDT
Funny thoughts. Computer is a new science and people in the future may be chocked in the history classes about our time.

It is like some powerful company owing the wheel technology. And being able to hide it from the others. From that point those two companies did control the transportation got incredible power.

Ok, you can't cryptograph metal and rubber... But you can do that with bits.

Unless people realized that and started to develop it as science as usual, with peer review etc. That is the way things should be.
Reply to this comment
by giant_david September 3, 2008 7:59 AM PDT
Funny thoughts. Computer is a new science and people in the future may be chocked in the history classes about our time.

It is like some powerful company owing the wheel technology. And being able to hide it from the others. From that point those two companies did control the transportation got incredible power.

Ok, you can't cryptograph metal and rubber... But you can do that with bits.

Unless people realized that and started to develop it as science as usual, with peer review etc. That is the way things should be.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto September 3, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
The zealotry may sometimes be grating, but I for one am damned glad that Stallman did what he did, and (grudgingly) continues to do.

/P
Reply to this comment
by Sentinel September 3, 2008 12:58 PM PDT
I have to say I have my doubt as to just how much Stallman has contributed to the GNU project, aside from being its founder.
It is true that he is the founder and perhaps one of the most influential representative of all free software, and I don't mean to say otherwise. But how much time has he actually spent coding for the Operating System? The kernel he started to write, the GNU Hurd, has been in development since the beginning of GNU (that's almost 25 years), and according to the FSF homepage, is still not ready for production use. Now the Linux kernel made it into the corporate enterprise in less than 10 years. Go fig.
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Business Tech

Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Business Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right