Security

Read all 'Adobe' posts in Security
December 17, 2009 3:07 PM PST

Firefox, Adobe top buggiest-software list

by Elinor Mills
  • 85 comments

Firefox was the application that had the most reported vulnerabilities this year, while holes in Adobe Reader more than tripled from a year ago, according to statistics compiled by Qualys, a vulnerability management provider.

Qualys tallied 102 vulnerabilities that were found in Firefox this year, up from 90 last year. The numbers are based on running totals in the National Vulnerability Database.

However, the high number of Firefox vulnerabilities doesn't necessarily mean the Web browser actually has the most bugs; it just means it has the most reported holes. Because the software is open source, all holes are publicly disclosed, whereas proprietary software makers, like Adobe and Microsoft, typically only publicly disclose holes that were found by researchers outside the company, and not ones discovered internally, Qualys Chief Technology Officer Wolfgang Kandek said late on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Adobe took the second place spot from Microsoft this year. The number of vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader rose from 14 last year to 45 this year, while those in Microsoft Office dropped from 44 to 41, according to Qualys. Internet Explorer had 30 vulnerabilities.

A shift in focus
The numbers illustrate the trend of attackers turning their focus away from operating systems and toward applications, Kandek said.

"Operating systems have become more stable and harder to attack and that's why attackers are migrating to applications, he said. "Adobe is a huge focus for attacks now, around 10 times more than Microsoft Office. However, other widely used targets like Internet Explorer and Firefox are still far from secure."

Research from F-Secure earlier this year provides further evidence that holes in Adobe applications are being targeted more than Microsoft apps. During the first three months of 2009, F-Secure discovered 663 targeted attack files, the most popular type being PDFs at nearly 50 percent, followed by Microsoft Word at nearly 40 percent, Excel at 7 percent, and PowerPoint at 4.5 percent.

That compared with Word representing nearly 35 percent of all 1,968 targeted attacks in 2008, followed by Reader at more than 28 percent, Excel at nearly 20 percent, and PowerPoint at nearly 17 percent.

As a result, Adobe needs to respond the way Microsoft did in 2002 when it launched its Trustworthy Computing initiative, and make securing its software a company-wide priority, researchers say. F-Secure even recommended that people stop using Reader and use an alternative PDF reader.

Adobe has taken some action, announcing in May that it would release its security updates on a regular schedule, quarterly and coinciding with every third Microsoft Patch Tuesday.

Another study released this week focuses on which applications are the riskiest to users. Based on the most severe vulnerabilities in popular applications that run on Windows and which are not updated automatically, Firefox again tops the list, followed by Adobe Reader and Apple QuickTime, according to Bit9, a provider of application whitelisting technology.

The list of risky software compiled by Bit9 based on the National Vulnerability Database also includes Java, Flash Player, Safari, Shockwave, Acrobat, Opera, Real Player, and Trillian. Last year, the Bit9 list of the most risky apps included Skype, Yahoo IM, and AOL IM, but those three were not on this year's list.

Not included on the list are programs from Microsoft and Google because of the ability for users of their software to have patches installed automatically. Microsoft software can be automatically and centrally updated via the Microsoft Systems Management Server and Windows Server Update Services, and Google Chrome is automatically updated when users are on the Internet, Bit9 said.

The lists do not take into account the amount of time it takes for companies to release patches, particularly when there is an exploit in the wild. Bit9 noted that Microsoft Internet Explorer was given an "honorable mention" because of a zero-day vulnerability related to ActiveX that went unpatched for three weeks in July.

Microsoft isn't alone in taking longer than customers would like to fix holes. In March, Adobe released a patch for a zero-day vulnerability in Reader and Acrobat--about two weeks after it was disclosed to users and nearly two months after exploits had been discovered in the wild.

Adobe customers will have to wait about a month for a fix to the latest critical zero-day hole in Reader and Acrobat. The company announced on Wednesday it would not patch the vulnerability until its next scheduled quarterly security update release on January 12.

Updated December 21: to clarify in paragraphs one and four that Adobe Reader specifically is ranked second in vulnerabilities, followed by Microsoft Office, and that Internet Explorer alone had 30 vulnerabilities.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
December 16, 2009 12:45 PM PST

Adobe to patch zero-day Reader, Acrobat hole

by Elinor Mills
  • 14 comments

Adobe on January 12 will patch a critical hole in Reader and Acrobat that is being exploited in attacks. That date is the company's next scheduled quarterly security update release.

The zero-day hole, which affects Reader and Acrobat versions 9.2 and earlier, could crash the system and allow an attacker to take control of the computer.

Malicious Adobe Acrobat PDF files are distributed via an e-mail attachment that, when opened, executes a Trojan that targets Windows systems, according to Symantec. The rate of infection is extremely limited and the risk assessment level is very low, the company said.

Adobe decided to issue the patch in cycle in about four weeks rather than work on an earlier patch release because that would take between two and three weeks to deliver and would put the regular quarterly update off schedule, the company said in a blog post.

"The team determined that by putting additional resources over the holidays towards the engineering and testing work required to ship a high confidence fix for this issue with low risk of introducing any new problems, they could deliver the fix as part of the quarterly update on January 12, 2010," Adobe's Brad Arkin wrote.

In the meantime, customers can use a new JavaScript Blacklist mitigation feature that allows for easy disabling of JavaScript, Arkin said.

"Additionally, an informal poll we conducted indicated that most of the organizations we talked with were in favor of [releasing the patch in cycle] to better align with their schedules," he wrote.

Meanwhile, Webroot analyzed the payload of the malware and found that it installs three files that look like Windows system files that are digitally signed with a forged Microsoft certificate. Unlike legitimate Microsoft-signed certificates, these lack an e-mail address and a time stamp, the company said in a blog post.

"Authors of Trojan horse apps rarely go to the trouble of digitally signing files in this way," writes Webroot researcher Andrew Brandt. "It's not clear why they would be digitally signing files, but clearly the person or people behind this are up to no good."

Updated 3:50 p.m. PST with Webroot finding forged Microsoft certificates in the malware.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
December 15, 2009 11:52 AM PST

Symantec confirms zero-day Acrobat, Reader attack

by Elinor Mills
  • 6 comments

Symantec on Tuesday confirmed a vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat and Reader and said it was being exploited by a Trojan hidden in e-mail attachments.

The malicious Adobe Acrobat PDF file is distributed via an e-mail attachment that "drops and executes when opened on a fully patched system with either Adobe Acrobat or Reader installed," Symantec said in a statement.

Symantec identified the file as Trojan Pidief.H, which targets Windows 98, 95, XP, Windows Me, Vista, NT, 2000 and Server 2003.

The rate of infection is extremely limited and the risk assessment level is very low, according to Symantec.

The exploit has been in the wild since at least last Friday, according to the Shadow Server blog.

"Several tests have confirmed this is a 0-day vulnerability affecting several versions of Adobe Acrobat [Reader] to include the most recent versions of 8.x and 9.x. We have not tested on 7.x, but it may also be vulnerable," the post says. "We did not discover this vulnerability but have received multiple reports of this issue and have examined multiple different copies of malicious PDFs that exploit this issue. This is legit and is very bad."

The vulnerability is in a JavaScript function within Adobe Acrobat Reader itself, the Shadow Server post says, before advising users to disable JavaScript.

Adobe posted a security advisory late on Tuesday saying that it had confirmed a critical vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions that could crash the system and allow an attacker to take control of the computer.

Affected software is Reader 9.2 and earlier for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix, and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier for Windows and Macintosh, Adobe said. The company recommended disabling JavaScript to protect the system.

Adobe had said on Monday night that it was investigating reports of a vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions being exploited in the wild.

Adobe has increasingly had to deal with holes in and exploits targeting its popular software. Adobe issued updates in October that fixed nearly 30 holes in Reader and Acrobat 9.2. Earlier that month, Trend Micro reported on a zero-day exploit targeting Adobe Reader, as well as 9.1.3 and earlier versions of Adobe Systems' Acrobat.

In July, Adobe warned of attacks in which malicious PDF files were exploiting a vulnerability in Flash. And in April a new Reader hole emerged after Adobe fixed a two-month-old critical vulnerability in Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9.

Updated 5:10 p.m. PST with Adobe confirming vulnerability.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
December 14, 2009 4:45 PM PST

Adobe investigating Reader, Acrobat exploit reports

by Elinor Mills
  • 12 comments

Adobe warned of reports of an attack exploiting a hole in Reader and Acrobat on Monday.

"This afternoon, Adobe received reports of a vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 and earlier versions being exploited in the wild," the company said in an advisory on its Security Incident Response Team blog. "We are currently investigating this issue and assessing the risk to our customers. We will provide an update as soon as we have more information."

Three different security vendor partners reported the alleged exploit to the company on Monday afternoon, said Adobe spokeswoman Wiebke Lips. She said she could not provide more details.

Last week, Adobe released a critical update affecting Flash Player and Adobe AIR.

Meanwhile, some Macintosh users were reporting on the Adobe Forums site that they were having problems installing an update from October that resolved a critical vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.1.3 that had reportedly been exploited in the wild.

Updated 6:01 p.m. PST with Mac user problems installing update.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
November 12, 2009 11:12 AM PST

Expert says Adobe Flash policy is risky

by Elinor Mills
  • 17 comments

Updated 1:49 p.m. PST to clarify that Gmail issue was fixed and any attack would be theoretically possible but extremely difficult to accomplish.

A lax security policy in Adobe Flash puts visitors to user-generated content sites at risk, says a researcher who has found a technique exploiting the way browsers handle Flash files.

The problem stems from the origin policy of Adobe Flash, Mike Bailey, a senior security researcher at Foreground Security, said in an interview on Wednesday. "Adobe should change the way Flash Player handles the security policy so it doesn't allow arbitrary content to access the application without permission."

By default, Flash Player trusts anything, but it should only trust what is allowed," he said, providing more technical discussion in a blog post.

For example, someone could upload what appears to be a picture to a social-networking site but which is actually a Flash file designed to execute malicious code in the browser when the file is opened. Anyone who views that picture could be compromised, said Mike Murray, chief information security officer at Foreground Security.

Bailey said that as far as he knows the technique has not been used in the wild as an attack, but that a "huge number of sites are vulnerable." (Gmail previously had an issue that could allow for this type of attack, but that has been fixed. Flash payload could "theoretically" still be executed, but it would be incredibly difficult to do, Baily wrote in his post.)

Adobe has known about the issue for a while but says it can't fix it or risk breaking a lot of existing Flash content and applications around the Web, he said.

Administrators make configuration changes to each Web site to mitigate the risk, Bailey said.

Meanwhile, users should disable Flash completely or use NoScript, a browser plug-in that blocks Flash and Java from untrusted sites, he said.

Asked to comment, an Adobe representative provided this statement:

"Generally speaking, by nature, Flash (SWF) content is powerful, active content and should be handled with the same care as other active content technologies, such as JavaScript, to ensure a site's design does not become vulnerable to abuse scenarios. Adobe has always advised that allowing arbitrary uploads or attachments of Flash (SWF) content to trusted domains should not be performed due to potential abuse scenarios, such as the ones outlined by Mike Bailey. Adobe has published several best practice advisories and blog posts for developers and site owners on how to safely host Flash content. For example, our Flash Player security white paper describes our model in great detail."

This screenshot shows an e-mail attachment executed in the context of a Squirrelmail client session, which leads to compromise of the Web-based e-mail account.

(Credit: Foreground Security)
Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
October 13, 2009 12:55 PM PDT

Adobe fixes 28 holes in Reader and Acrobat

by Elinor Mills
  • 9 comments

Adobe on Tuesday released a security bulletin that includes fixes for 28 vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader and Acrobat, including a critical hole that has reportedly been exploited in the wild in limited attacks.

Affected software includes version 9.1.3 of Reader and Acrobat; Acrobat 8.1.6 for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix; and version 7.1.3 of Reader and Acrobat for Windows and Macintosh. The vulnerabilities could cause the applications to crash and could allow an attacker to take control of a user's computer.

Adobe recommends that people update to Adobe Reader 9.2 and Acrobat 9.2, or Acrobat 8.1.7 or Acrobat 7.1.4. For Adobe Reader users who cannot update to Adobe Reader 9.2, Adobe has provided the Adobe Reader 8.1.7 and Adobe Reader 7.1.4 updates.

One of the updates addresses a hole that Trend Micro says has been exploited by a Trojan horse that arrives as a PDF file containing malicious JavaScript. That exploit affects Microsoft Windows 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, and Server 2003, according to Trend Micro.

"All users of Adobe Reader or Acrobat will need to update their software with today's release because these updates include fixes for the most critical kind of bugs," said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle.

This is Adobe's second quarterly security update for Adobe Reader and Acrobat.

Also on Tuesday, Microsoft issued a security advisory with a record number of bulletins, including the first fixes for critical holes in Windows 7.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
October 9, 2009 5:24 PM PDT

Adobe exploit puts backdoor on computers

by Elinor Mills
  • 28 comments

A new zero-day exploit targeting Adobe Reader, as well as 9.1.3 and earlier versions of Adobe Systems' Acrobat, drops a backdoor onto computers using JavaScript, Trend Micro researchers warned on Friday.

Trend Micro identified the exploit as a Trojan horse dubbed "Troj_Pidief.Uo" in a blog post. It arrives as a PDF file containing JavaScript-based malware, "Js_Agent.Dt," and then drops a backdoor called "Bkdr_Protux.Bd."

The exploit affects Microsoft Windows 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, and Server 2003, according to Trend Micro.

The blog post provides technical details on how the malware works, specifically the activity of its shell code, the piece of code that delivers the payload. The JavaScript is used to execute arbitrary codes in a technique known as "heap spraying."

"Based on our findings, the shell code (that was heap-sprayed) jumps to another shell code inside the PDF file" before extracting and executing the backdoor, Trend Micro said. The backdoor "is also embedded in the PDF file and not the usual file downloaded from the Web."

Variants of the Protux backdoor typically provide an attacker unrestricted user-level access to a compromised machine and previously exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office files, according to Trend Micro.

Adobe announced on Thursday that it would release an update to fix the hole on Tuesday, the same day as Microsoft's Patch Tuesday.

This screenshot shows the embedded executable file in the PDF file, after it has been decrypted.

(Credit: Trend Micro)
Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
August 6, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

Is Adobe the next (pre-2002) Microsoft?

by Elinor Mills
  • 58 comments

If you're a criminal and you want to break into a network, a common attack method is to exploit a hole in software that exists on most computers, has its fair share of holes, and isn't automatically updated.

In 2002, that would have been Windows. Today, it's likely to be Adobe Reader or Flash Player, whose share of vulnerabilities and exploits are on the rise while Microsoft's is falling.

Nearly half of targeted attacks exploit holes in Acrobat Reader, which is used to read PDF (portable document format) files, according to F-Secure. Meanwhile, the number of PDF files used in dangerous Web drive-by attacks jumped from 128 during the first three and a half months of last year to more than 2,300 during that time this year, the company said.

In addition, there are more and more zero-day holes, vulnerabilities that are public before a patch is available. Like sitting ducks, users of affected software are left wide open to attack until a fix is available.

There have been zero-day exploits for the Flash Player plug-in, used for viewing rich media like videos and interactive charts on Web sites. And in one case this spring, a zero-day hole in Adobe Reader spurred security experts to recommend that users disable JavaScript.

One security researcher at Black Hat last week, who asked to remain anonymous, said: "As a result of the number of zero-day attacks on PDFs this year, large banks hate Adobe."

F-Secure said it identified about 1,967 targeted attack files in 2008, the most popular type being .doc used in Microsoft Word.

(Credit: F-Secure)

Those scary statistics prompted F-Secure researcher Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at F-Secure, to urge Adobe Reader users to switch to an alternative PDF reader at the RSA show in April.

Adobe "has a lot to learn from, of all places, Microsoft," Hypponen said at the time. At the Black Hat and Defcon security shows last week, others concurred.

"Adobe is the next Microsoft," said Roel Schouwenberg, a senior antivirus researcher at Kaspersky. "They are slowly realizing that they have become a main vector of getting into a machine...We as an industry must push hard" to get Adobe to improve security.

An Adobe manager said the problem stems from the fact that it's software is so broadly used.

"It's only natural, given the fact that some of our products like Reader and Flash Player are some of the most widely distributed on Earth, that they would be targeted by attacks," Brad Arkin, director for product security and privacy at Adobe, said in an interview on Wednesday.

Microsoft has been in the same boat, and in many ways still is. The difference is in how the companies respond to the problem, experts said.

Microsoft: Been there, done that
In January 2002, Bill Gates launched the Trustworthy Computing initiative and said security would be a top priority for the company. Microsoft had to do something to combat the negative press and public opinion over its whack-a-mole strategy for countering the viruses and other security holes that plagued its software.

The company established a Security Development Lifecycle program, designed to build security into the software, that has become the standard others in the industry follow. It is roundly lauded for its efforts.

During the first three months of 2009, F-Secure discovered 663 targeted attack files, the most popular type being PDF. The change from the previous year is primarily due to the fact that there have been more vulnerabilities in Adobe Acrobat/Reader than in Microsoft Office, F-Secure said.

(Credit: F-Secure)

Now it's Adobe's turn to step up to the plate.

"Microsoft is a model for patch management...they were forced into it. They really turned around," Hypponen said in an interview last week at Black Hat. "Now, Flash and Reader are ubiquitous and it's harder and harder to target Microsoft, so the attackers are looking for easier targets."

In particular, Adobe's patching process isn't as robust as Microsoft's, he and others said.

In all fairness, Adobe is on the right path. Prompted by a zero-day hole in Reader, Adobe decided in May to start releasing patches on a quarterly basis, and to schedule the updates to coincide with Microsoft's Patch Tuesday releases.

At the time of the Adobe announcement, Arkin said the company was reviewing "everything from our security team's communications during an incident to our security update process to the code itself." He also promised that users would "see more timely communications regarding incidents, quicker turnaround times on patch releases, and simultaneous patches for more affected versions as we move forward."

The company was the first third-party vendor to release a fix for software affected by a vulnerability in Microsoft's Active Template Library, which is used to build components for Web applications and which was being exploited, according to Arkin.

"We scoured the entire Adobe portfolio and evaluated more than 200 products in the field today to determine which might be vulnerable," he said, adding that fixes for Shockwave Player and Flash Player shipped within weeks.

Adobe "has a lot to learn from, of all places, Microsoft."
--Mikko Hypponen, F-Secure

A zero-day exploit targeting Reader and Acrobat that Adobe learned about on April 27 was fixed about two weeks later, he said. And Adobe issued a patch last week for a critical Flash Player problem that was being exploited, allowing attackers to take over a computer via content viewed in a browser.

"We are quite happy with the performance on those," Arkin said of the time frame for the patches.

The company also has been turning an eye toward "digging into legacy code" and looking for additional ways to improve products overall he said. "Adobe integrates the best practices you see at Microsoft and other companies."

The security researcher who asked not to be named complained that at an architectural level, some Adobe applications have too much access to the operating system. "Why should something that operates on untrusted data have full access to your trusted data?" he asked, mentioning specifically Adobe Reader and its ability to access the hard drive to read and write files.

The program's functions require it to be able to save and open files on the file system and thus have read and write access to the hard drive, Arkin said. "Web browsers all have the ability to save to the file system," and the privileges between the two types of programs are similar, he added.

Security-versus-functionality trade-offs aside, changes in Adobe's products and processes will come in response to market pressures and not merely because it's the favorite target for attackers, said Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer of BT Counterpane.

"This is all very much a business decision, whether the company decides to take security seriously or not," he said, adding that he spent his day dealing with Adobe updates.

"I'd like to think that they would start realizing that they can use security as a selling point, but it took Linux to get Microsoft to do that. They felt they had competition," he said. "Is there a Linux waiting to affect Adobe?"

Not really, the experts agreed.

Dan Kaminsky, director of penetration testing at IOActive, praised Adobe for "reconfiguring itself" with regards to security issues and suggested critics should cut the company some slack.

"The PDF exploitation only recently blew up, and remember, it takes any software development house a while to really address problems," he said, adding that Flash 9 was much more secure than Flash 8.

"Does Adobe have products they need to lock down? Yes. Are they in the process of doing so? Yes. They did it for Flash and they'll do it for Reader," he said.

"There's always a 'most vulnerable' attack surface."

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
July 30, 2009 3:14 PM PDT

Adobe patches critical Flash hole

by Stephen Shankland
  • 6 comments

Adobe has released a patch for a critical Flash Player problem that could let attackers take over people's computers through content viewed in a browser.

The vulnerability affected a file that shipped with Flash Player 9.x and 10.x for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux, and with Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat 9.x for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix. Adobe said Thursday it fixed the problem in a security advisory, and Adobe's Matt Rozen posted a note on Twitter that directed people to download the patched version from Adobe's Flash download site.

This was no abstract, theoretical vulnerability, either.

"There are reports that this vulnerability is being actively exploited in the wild via limited, targeted attacks against Adobe Reader v9 on Windows," Adobe said in an earlier advisory about the problem.

Flash is very widely used in browsers to power features such as interactive stock charts and YouTube video streaming.

July 23, 2009 12:41 PM PDT

Adobe to fix critical Flash hole next week

by Elinor Mills
  • 4 comments

(Credit: Adobe)

Adobe said Thursday that it will issue fixes next week for a critical hole in Flash that is being exploited in attacks against Adobe Reader version 9 on Windows.

The vulnerability exists in current versions of Flash Player for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux and the authplay.dll component that ships with Adobe Reader and Acrobat v9.x for those same platforms, Adobe said in an advisory.

The vulnerability could cause a system to crash or allow an attacker to take control of the computer, Adobe said.

An update for Flash Player v9 and v10 for Windows, Mac, and Linux will be released by July 30, while a fix for Solaris is pending. Adobe should have an update for Reader and Acrobat v9.1.2 for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix by July 31.

An attacker can exploit the vulnerability by luring someone to a Web site hosting a specially crafted Shockwave Flash file, US-CERT said in an advisory Thursday.

"The Adobe Flash browser plug-in is available for multiple Web browsers and operating systems, any of which could be affected," CERT said. "An attacker could also create a PDF document that has an embedded SWF file to exploit the vulnerability. This vulnerability is being actively exploited."

The vulnerabilities can be mitigated by disabling the Flash plug-in or by using the NoScript extension for Mozilla Firefox or SeaMonkey to whitelist sites that can access the Flash plug-in, CERT said.

To disable Flash, US-CERT recommends:

• Disabling Flash in Adobe Reader 9 on Windows platforms by renaming the following files: "%ProgramFiles%\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\authplay.dll" and "%ProgramFiles%\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\rt3d.dll".

• Disabling Flash Player or selectively enabling Flash content as described in the "Securing Your Web Browser" document.

"Deleting, renaming, or removing access to the authplay.dll file that ships with Adobe Reader and Acrobat v9.x mitigates the threat for those products, but users will experience a non-exploitable crash or error message when opening a PDF that contains SWF (Shockwave Flash) content," the Adobe advisory said.

Typically, the authplay.dll that ships with Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x for Windows is located at C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\authplay.dll or C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 9.0]\Acrobat\authplay.dll, Adobe said.

Windows Vista users can mitigate the impact of the exploit by enabling UAC (User Access Control), according to Adobe. Flash Player users should be careful when browsing unfamiliar Web sites.

Researchers on Wednesday reported that they had uncovered attacks in the wild in which malicious Acrobat PDF files were exploiting a vulnerability in Flash and dropping a Trojan onto computers.

The bug used in the exploit has been around since December 2008.

Originally posted at InSecurity Complex
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

Most Discussed



advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right