March 31, 2004 2:13 PM PST
Ashcroft creates task force for copyright violations
The U.S. Justice Department said Wednesday that it had created a task force to evaluate prosecutions of copyright violations, including Internet piracy, and make recommendations about how existing efforts can be improved. "The task force will determine how best to meet the evolving challenges that law enforcement faces in the intellectual property arena," said David Israelite, deputy chief of staff to Attorney General John Ashcroft and chairman of the task force.
Although Congress has pressured the department to use the powerful No Electronic Theft Act to jail file-swappers, no such prosecutions have taken place. Wednesday's announcement also comes as proposals are circulating in Congress to give the Justice Department the power to levy additional civil penalties on copyright infringers.
5 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
All of this copyright-violation prosecution garbage has gone way beyond reasonable. It scares a few newbies away from sharing; charges a few big violators; and puts a bad name on anyone who downloads anything.
The music industry needs to wise up, and get with the times; and the government/politicians need to stay out of it.
Government is supposed to be "of the people and for the people", not "of the companies and for the companies"... that are too stupid to massage their business plan/bottomline enough to keep with the times.
Canadian government has the right idea... it's not their business to nose in. When the government comes in to break up a monopoly, it hurts, but it's for the best all around in the long term. But when government comes in to back up a multi-billion dollar (near monopolistic) industry, and attack millions of individuals, there's something wrong in the wind.
I personally don't have a strong enough interest in music. I rarely find the need beyond what a radio offers. Is recording music off the, freely broadcast, radio a copyright issue? I don't see radio/cassette-recorder owners being attacked. Maybe it's just because it's a lower quality, and harder to exchange. Isn't that what computers are SUPPOSED to do? Increase convenience and abilities?
What next? Movie downloaders? TV show downloaders? Electronic book downloaders? Documents? Informational websites?
Where do we draw the line?
Make the recording industry increase the quality of their product to give downloaders a place to get better music/movies than available online. Maybe lower the price, or raise the number of songs on a CD. I can fit 10 times as many songs on a CD than what is commonly sold, simply because they are MP3 format. They can make music CDs especially for computers and/or MP3 players.
When VHS came out, did it kill the TV/movie industry? No, because they produce better quality, and more recent offerings. Make the RIAA push for quality, not push people away.
Here in england (and I thought over there in the US) Copyright violations are civil, not criminal law (obviously, counterfitting/piracy is criminal, and circumventing a protection measure would be illegal under the DMCA, but casual copying is still not piracy (which is defined as making copies for sale) or counterfitting (making copies for sale presented as original, legal copies)
When did copyright enforcement become a criminal matter in the US?
Thank you.
Chris