• On The Insider: Shields Reveals MJ Relationship Secrets

April 27, 2005 8:51 AM PDT

Scheme preys on people who mistype 'Google.com'

  • 41 comments
Security researchers have discovered an attack aimed at would-be visitors to Google.com, one that attempts to download malicious programs onto the computers of people who simply mistype the search giant's Web address.

According to security specialist F-Secure, unsuspecting Web surfers may be bombarded with various types of Trojan horse threats, spyware and backdoors when they go to "Googkle.com." The scheme is meant to take advantage of sloppy or hurried typists, given that on most keyboards the letter "k" key sits next to the "l" needed to type "Google."

Google representatives said the company had no comment on the matter for the time being.

In the past, the company appears to have made moves to protect its users against mistyping errors. If a person puts an extra "o" in Google's URL, they are simply redirected to the company's homepage. On the other hand, if someone mistakenly adds a fourth "o" to Google, they are directed to USseek.com, a Web portal that offers pop-up advertising for an online casino.

In an advisory, F-Secure strongly advises people not to go to Googkle.com. People who do so will see two pop-ups linked to Web sites that install the Trojan programs. One of the programs is a phishing-style Trojan that attempts to garner individuals' online banking information, while another drops phony antivirus alerts on the victim's desktop that attempt to lure people to other infected Web sites.

While relatively low-tech in terms of its social engineering, the URL mistype attack is an approach that has long been incorporated by many different kinds of Internet opportunists, from legitimate companies trying to steal traffic from their rivals or simply piggyback on the success of larger companies, to criminals looking to misrepresent themselves and trick consumers into handing over personal data.

In one of the most famous instances of URL deception, the site hosted at Whitehouse.com for several years was an advertisement for pornography, not a link to the office of the president, whose official site is Whitehouse.gov.

See more CNET content tagged:
F-Secure Corp., Google Inc., trojan horse, security

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (41 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
trojans?
by April 27, 2005 9:50 AM PDT
Sheesh, get a Mac. Unbelievable that your OS wouldn't protect you any better...
Reply to this comment
Do you even know what a trojan is?
by Jonathan April 27, 2005 1:49 PM PDT
Or more specifically that any OS can suffer the effects of a trojan because of the nature of how they work by tricking the user. Here?s a thought. Read up and understand what you are posting about before you shoot off your mouth.
View all 3 replies
No Thanks
by 201293546946733175101343322673 April 28, 2005 7:23 PM PDT
You want me to "switch" and invest my hard earn money to that arrogant & greedy Mr. Jobs and his gang? No thanks, I will pass :)
Or if you want a computer...
by sanenazok April 27, 2005 10:37 AM PDT
just install Firefox. The reason why there's no trojans for macs is because trojans exist to get people's information - so you need a large number of USERS. Oh and they need to have bank accounts.
Reply to this comment
I really enjoy your comedy!
by April 27, 2005 10:46 AM PDT
I find this statement extremely amusing! Would you consider 25
Million users a large number? Viruses are written by mainly
teenage kids... are they brilliant... or just copying and pasting
readily available code and distributing it.. In addition, wouldn't
you think it would be a major accomplishment to write a virus
for a UNIX based OS? Perhaps its too difficult... why waste your
time failing when a simple web page could infect a windows os.
Keep thinking that way!!!
View reply
FireFox, huh?
by 201293546946733175101343322673 April 28, 2005 7:24 PM PDT
I can't wait to see how "secure" FireFox is......oh, maybe I should say "how FireFox users "think" FireFox is secure" :)
View reply
Enjoyment is a two-way street
by sanenazok April 27, 2005 1:42 PM PDT
There's a difference between an OS and a browser, did you hear about that? It's not Windows that gets infected, but rather IE, and only if you let it. There are security holes and viruses for the Mac, it's just nobody bothers to distribute them, because they won't run on PC's. Duhhh
Reply to this comment
Ok... If there are viruses for OS X
by April 27, 2005 3:53 PM PDT
Please name one....
View reply
IE == Windows
by quantum0726 April 28, 2005 12:13 AM PDT
Perhaps, but IE is so integrated into the Windows OS that
infecting IE can practically devistate the system. Using a
browser like Firefox (which is separate from the OS) or any
browser in Mac OS X, all of which are separate from the OS, will
limit the chance of any virus/spyware/malware being able to do
any real damage to your OS.

However, as secure as Mac OS X is, it still won't protect users
from phishing schemes. That protection falls solely on the user.
View all 2 replies
I See
by 201293546946733175101343322673 April 28, 2005 7:25 PM PDT
So you think you are the only person in the world to know the differences between an OS and a browser? Give me a break :)
Nope. Using Firefox with the new popup extension
by Jonathan April 27, 2005 1:45 PM PDT
Oh you are talking about the idiots still using IE. Sorry.
Reply to this comment
Hmmm..
by David Arbogast April 27, 2005 3:02 PM PDT
Right or wrong, you will always be on the losing side of the argument when you accuse an overwhelming majority of the people of being "idiots." Lets leave the blame on the hackers, not the users. I won't call people "idiots" for using standard locks on their doors.... even though they can be easily picked.
View all 2 replies
I can't wait....
by TimeBomb April 27, 2005 6:41 PM PDT
For XPI-based malware. Then, I'll post a comment saying "Nope. Using Opera", with the content being "Oh you are talking about the idiots still using Firefux. Sorry."
Hi Smart Cookie
by 201293546946733175101343322673 April 28, 2005 7:28 PM PDT
If you want to be a smart ass, so be it, but just because you know how to use FireFox does not mean you are SMARTER :)
View reply
i support googkle
by Sam Papelbon April 28, 2005 9:20 AM PDT
so long as it helps rid the internet of people who can't spell. especially a simple word like google. now if the website in question was electroencephalogram.com or floccinaucinihilipilification.net then i suppose i'd see it as a problem
Reply to this comment
I agree
by Bryan Bartlett April 28, 2005 9:58 AM PDT
(Warning, the following statement is full of sarcasm)
And right after this site gets rid of the people who can't spell, maybe they can move on to the people who don't use proper capitalization and spell everything in lowercase! Then it could move on to other grammatical errors people make weeding them out little by little until you can't make any errors in typing a URL without getting a virus. Because everyone knows that people who can't spell is such a HUGE plague terrorizing everyone on the internet.
(End of sarcasm)

Anyways, the thought of supporting someone who puts viruses on people's computers just because they happen to type a 'k' in the name of google, or any other grammar errors in any website, is completely retarded.
Just Use Bookmark
by 201293546946733175101343322673 April 28, 2005 7:29 PM PDT
Why not just put google in the bookmart or simply set it as the home page? For people who do not know how to spell, this is a good tip for you all :)
View reply
There is a difference between not being able to spell and a typo.
by pcLoadLetter April 30, 2005 10:06 AM PDT
Do you really not understand the difference?
A Rose by any other name....
by sanenazok April 28, 2005 10:26 AM PDT
It's straight from Symantec, you have to look beyond the name.

Remember, don't judge a book by its cover.
Reply to this comment
How is this Even LEGAL??
by April 29, 2005 9:16 AM PDT
I donīt get it. How is this even legal? and if so why do we let stuff like this exist! I am so sick and tired of having to deal with viruses,trojans and spam. There should be heavy laws against this stuff with serious jail time!!! Everyone complains, you see it on CNN, but the end result is nothing. Why do we give free reign to these theives??
Reply to this comment
why?
by April 29, 2005 11:55 AM PDT
Because they're hard to catch.
Then don't deal with it
by pcLoadLetter April 30, 2005 10:05 AM PDT
Viri and worms are easy to avoid. Use a good AV program, and don't use IE.

Spyware is easy to avoid, Use a good spyware blocker and don't use IE.

Spam is easy to avoid, don't spread your email address around, and use a alternate address if you need to give it to some site and think you might get spammed. A hotmail account is perfect for this, what else would anyone use hotmail for besides a junk repository?

Phishing scams are easy to avoid. Don't be stupid.

I use Firefox, AVG anti-virus, Zone-Alarm pro, Spybots tea timer, and scan once a week with spybot and Ad-aware. I am careful who gets my address, even cnet only has my spam address. I haven't got any spyware in months, I have never gotten a virus or worm, and haven't seen a bit of spam in well over a year.

Of course, all this effort should not be necessary, I don't have to worry about any of this on my linux install. No, don't bother trying to claim that linux is only safer because it isn't 'popular', that myth has been debunked countless times and will only make you look like an idiot.
Legality in an internet world
by james.grimes May 5, 2005 9:22 AM PDT
First off, the internet isn't in just the US, it is around the world. Therefore, it is subject to not only one set of laws, but many. Even if the US tried to get these trojan horse makers and make them pay for the damage they cause to the thousands of computers each year, all they have to do is move there server to a country to a place with laxer laws, hookup there server to the internet, and they are back online and out of the grasp of the US legal system. It is a shame, but thats life. Now, if only we can get the UN to try to come up with an "Internet Treaty" that allows the home country of users who get damaged by trojan horses to be able to go after the trjan horse makers. That would stop things. Besides, I don't use Internet Exploder (I mean Explorer) anymore unless I am downloading something I want to specifically download from either CNET or another source.
Site is already down
by Gerald Quaglia April 29, 2005 9:35 PM PDT
Checked it out, with my mac of course!
Reply to this comment
(41 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Google (1.96%) 7.90 410.39
Dow Jones Industrials (0.06%) 4.76 8,183.17
S&P 500 (0.35%) 3.12 882.68
NASDAQ (0.31%) 5.38 1,752.55
CNET TECH (0.38%) 4.78 1,259.65
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right