October 13, 2005 12:44 PM PDT
Panel: U.S. losing competitive edge in science
- Related Stories
-
Driverless robots reach milestone in DARPA race
October 8, 2005 -
Waging battle on foreign labor
October 6, 2005 -
India's renaissance: Move over, China
June 27, 2005 -
Surrendering U.S. leadership in IT
May 11, 2005 -
College freshmen less interested in tech
April 22, 2005
The nation's top advisory panel calls for an urgent effort to curb erosion of scientific competitiveness.
The New York Times
The story "Panel: U.S. losing competitive edge in science" published October 13, 2005 at 12:44 PM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.
16 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
principle of evolution is questioned by its politial leaders, there is
not much hope that Republicans that control goverment will really
support this call for action.
The battle is not really science leadership, it is funding education,
not war.
>that supports the principle of evolution is
>questioned by its politial leaders
Societies that adhere to strict religious dogma have a common quality: supression of fact. Science deals with fact, not faith.
People would do well to look at some of the "faith-based" societies in the world, where government and religion are deeply intertwined, and ask "do we really want to be anything like that?"
Corporate America (through their actions) has taught those of us in industry only too well that we better look out for our selves..
Students starting into college see this and are avoiding engineering and now, IT computer science jobs due to job instability..
The primary decision factor now in deciding an occupation has to be which has the least chance of being outsourced..
There just doesn't seem to be any will in the majority population, and in current elected leaders, to care about the long term economic future of this country, the current debt levels, both private and government..
But, the lived experience of all of us is that innovation occurs through applied creativity.
Far too many of the "scientists" I know spend their time dreaming up new ways to waste time through entertainment and other diversions.
At the same time, most of the ID advocates I know generate all sorts of useful solutions that enhance productivity and advance our understanding of physical, biological and mathematical processes.
Where to you think advancement is more likely to inhere? In one who thinks mind is an illusion and good behavior an optional social construct, or one who observes that incredible complexity is always the product of a mind and determines to use their own toward that goal?
Multinational companies don't care about anything but the bottom line, and that means no need for American engineers that work for more than a few dollars an hour.
I am an Indian. Believe me, we have the same problems the US has. Our institutions are not up to the mark - a few are top notch (IITs/IISc etc) but 90% are just sub-standard. Even the top notch institutes here dont do a fraction of research and innovation that most american universities do. And 1 billion people might sound like a lot, but not when you consider only 4% Indians pay income tax and have to support the other 96%. Where is the money for science? We barely had money to pay our interest payments 15 years ago - we don;t have roads, our trains suck, our airports suck, our ports suck - c'mon, we are a long way away from challenging anyone.
In any case, any threat that India offers is superficial. Check out the latest UK investment reports - India is among the largest investors in the UK. Probable reason - UK is among the most open to offshoring and increased contact with India. Globalization is collaborative, I think this proves it the most.
Indians might be better in general knowledge of math or science on an average, but the number of top people we have in each area are far below critical mass and will be for the next some time - at least till we get hundreds of billions of dollars invested in R&D.
what about implementation of all the recommendations of the past?
no more reports! action is necessary
The technological advances thru science and math take decades to achieve. US achieved it through great institutions and best brains coming from all over the world to join the best brains here and more than anything, a desire to excel in education in the early part of this century. When and if any of these are threatened, it is recipe for disaster. It is a very long way to go for US to lose its advantage but unless some steps are taken, it may happen very soon
Here is a much better question.
If you was God, How would you create the universe?
Now in Scientific terms How to open a Dimentional pocket and Terraform a Universe.
Now do YOU know how to open a Dimentional pocket?
What About Terraforming Mars? No?? Why not? Heck why have we NOT built Warp Drives? Teleporters? Cloaking Devices or any other Trek Tech?
Simple we do not know HOW...
ID Will lead to advances in nanotechnology, Space travel, Terraforing, advances in Genetics as well as new theories of Science & Mathmatics.
How closed minded of you to think different.
Then again I'm just another Heretic...
Ike