- Related Stories
-
Polyester fabric neutralizes stun gun jolt
April 5, 2006 -
A Taser shotgun for long-range electrifying
February 14, 2006 -
Shootout at the stun gun corral
October 10, 2005 -
The (painful) body electric
January 15, 2004 - Related Blogs
-
Taser's new six-shooter, of sorts
July 9, 2007 -
Taser goes wireless
July 6, 2007 -
Taser links up with iRobot for stunning new products
June 28, 2007
Taser will introduce an item far more compact and a lot less expensive than the standard Tasers used by police, though its shock is no less potent.
The New York Times![]()
Photos: Taser's C2 shocks at CES
The story "At Taser, offering security in shocking pink" published July 21, 2007 at 6:00 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.




There's hypocricy in this, in that police in Michigan can have these things, but citizens cannot. It's a felony to own one. What BS.
And besides, I'd rather be toting an AK-47 any day of the week over this thing. I WANT you to see I can plant you in the ground you from a football field away. I carry protection to KILL you, not tickle. They can't call it concealed anymore, when I've got it strapped over my shoulder in plain sight.
Taser's statement that it's ok to shoot somebody you think looks suspicious is about as strong an argument for weapon-producer liabilty as I've ever heard. I especially like how they recommend then dropping your Taser: the marketing people see assault and battery of innocent men as a sales event.
- taser better than shooting the person
-
by AZEqualizer
July 23, 2007 10:08 AM PDT
- Yep Taser may cause injury. But a firearm sure will kill you dead. As a retired police officer I give kudos to the Taser people. They now give citizens as well as police officers an alternative to deadly force.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)