July 21, 2007 6:00 AM PDT

At Taser, offering security in shocking pink

At Taser, offering security in shocking pink
Related Stories

Polyester fabric neutralizes stun gun jolt

April 5, 2006

A Taser shotgun for long-range electrifying

February 14, 2006

Shootout at the stun gun corral

October 10, 2005

The (painful) body electric

January 15, 2004
Related Blogs

Taser's new six-shooter, of sorts


July 9, 2007

Taser links up with iRobot for stunning new products


June 28, 2007

Taser goes wireless


July 6, 2007

Taser will introduce an item far more compact and a lot less expensive than the standard Tasers used by police, though its shock is no less potent.
The New York Times
Photos: Taser's C2 shocks at CES

The story "At Taser, offering security in shocking pink" published July 21, 2007 at 6:00 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.

3 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
Illegal in Michigan
I'm sorry, but until the states of this nation can get their collective macro heads in order and come to comformity in laws, this product is crap. Unless it somehow makes its way into the bill of rights along with guns, that won't happen.

There's hypocricy in this, in that police in Michigan can have these things, but citizens cannot. It's a felony to own one. What BS.

And besides, I'd rather be toting an AK-47 any day of the week over this thing. I WANT you to see I can plant you in the ground you from a football field away. I carry protection to KILL you, not tickle. They can't call it concealed anymore, when I've got it strapped over my shoulder in plain sight.
Posted by blurble (79 comments )
Reply Link Flag
30 second shock: 30 years paying the lawsuit off
Coming Soon: Some psychologically disturbed woman decides that some guy doesn't have the right to walk to his car -- that happens to be on the same floor as hers -- and shoots him with her $350 Taser. Once they force her to start taking her meds again she's gonna' realize that she just shot away her trust fund w/ a pull of the button. If the poor man has a heart condition and dies she's looking at years of hard time.

Taser's statement that it's ok to shoot somebody you think looks suspicious is about as strong an argument for weapon-producer liabilty as I've ever heard. I especially like how they recommend then dropping your Taser: the marketing people see assault and battery of innocent men as a sales event.
Posted by michaelo1966 (159 comments )
Reply Link Flag
taser better than shooting the person
Yep Taser may cause injury. But a firearm sure will kill you dead. As a retired police officer I give kudos to the Taser people. They now give citizens as well as police officers an alternative to deadly force.
Posted by AZEqualizer (16 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

ie8 fix

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

ie8 fix
  • Recently Viewed Products
  • My Lists
  • My Software Updates
  • Promo
  • Log In | Join CNET