If all goes as planned, chipmaker AMD will finally be able to brag about having the fastest PC chip on the planet.
AMD announced a 650-MHz version of the
Athlon processor, formerly the K7, today. "With today's announcement, AMD has made history," W.J. Sanders III, chairman and chief executive officer of AMD, said in a statement.
The chip should allow AMD to brag that its processors are faster
than rival Intel, which recently released a 600-MHz Pentium III. No
significant upgrades to the Pentium III line are due until November,
according to an Intel spokesman.
Compaq and IBM are announcing high-end consumer PCs with the Athlon chip. Also, chipset makers including Via, Acer Laboratories, and SiS are expected to announce support for the chip. A variety of PC circuit board makers, including AsusTek, are also expected to release products.
In addition, AMD will release three other Athlon chips running at slower speeds. The company intends to push the chips into the lucrative high-end business market. Shipments of the Athlon processor to PC makers began last quarter, AMD said.
The 650-MHz version is priced at $849 while the 600-MHz chip is set at $615. These lofty prices put AMD, for the first time, in the same price bracket as high-end Intel chips and may provide a revenue stream that has eluded AMD to date.
The 550-MHz chip is $449, and the 500-MHz is $249.
Some analysts have stated that the Athlon will outperform Intel's Pentium III on various applications when running at the same clock speed, which is measured in terms of megahertz. Benchmarks being released this week by AMD show that the chip outperforms Pentium III and even the higher-end Xeon by sizeable margins in a variety of applications.
The megahertz rating is important for marketing efforts. AMD and Intel executives have stated on numerous occasions that consumers often make purchasing decisions on the clock speed of chips. Until Athlon, AMD has equaled, but not surpassed, Intel in chip clock speed. Compaq makes a 667-MHz Alpha chip, but Compaq uses it in servers and
workstations, not PCs.
The company previously said it would release a 650-MHz Athlon in the third
quarter but said today that it would occur after the initial debut of the chips in August. A 700-MHz version is due in the fourth quarter, while Intel is planning 667-MHz and faster versions of the Pentium III.
Athlon-based PCs will start at $1,299 and go up to more than $2,000,
substantially higher than the price tag for PCs containing K6-2 and K6-III
processors, said Stephen Lapinski, director of marketing at AMD.
While most Athlon systems in the initial rush will go to the consumer
market, commercial systems will crop up soon. Besides offering more
performance in terms of the chip, the Athlon also comes coupled with
chipsets that provide a 200-MHz system bus originally developed for the
Alpha chip. The system bus, the main data conduit between the processor and
main memory, is a crucial bottleneck for performance. Intel's current
system bus runs at 100-MHz and will go to 133-MHz next month.
"There is a lot of interest in the bus," he said.
Dangers lurk
Of course, success in the megahertz race will depend upon Intel not rushing
a faster version of the Pentium III to market.
Smooth execution by AMD is another big if. AMD has stumbled in the past with manufacturing
and logistical nightmares that stalled product releases or prevented
the company from producing an adequate volume.
Dealers said chip distributors told them as recently as August 5 not
to expect Athlon chips, especially in volume quantities, just yet. The
Athlon is not universally compatible with all expansion cards and other PC
parts on the market, said other sources.
Further, the company is in the midst of several complex manufacturing
initiatives, any of which could hamper production volumes. The
company is in the process of shifting from the 0.25-micron manufacturing
process to the more advanced 0.18-micron process. By the fourth quarter,
the company will begin to make chips out of copper rather than aluminum and
it hopes to start generating revenue from these chips by the first quarter of
2000. Also, a new chip factory is opening in Dresden, Germany, and dual processing is
expected to reach the platform by the second quarter 2000.
AMD will also attempt to move into the untapped commercial market. The fear of manufacturing snafus, however, could scare
away large customers.
For its part, AMD exudes confidence--"tens of thousands" of Athlons at all
four speed grades have been shipped to manufacturers and distributors,
executives have said. The company expects to make hundreds of thousands
this quarter and will have the ability to make 1 million by the fourth
quarter.
Although manufacturing problems have saddled the company before, they may
not play as big a factor in the life of Athlon, said
Nathan Brookwood, an analyst at Insight 64.
Because the chip is aimed at the performance segment, rather than the value
segment, the company needs to produce fewer chips. Additionally, chip's design means AMD will not have to shift to
0.18-micron manufacturing or even copper to stay in a speed race with Intel.
Overall, manufacturing "is probably a more doable task than it was with the
K6," Brookwood said. Besides, Intel has run into manufacturing issues of its own.
Branding strategy The new chips will also be coming with a branding/segmentation strategy that
will kick off next year. Similar to what Intel has done with its Xeon,
Pentium III, and Celeron lines, AMD will take the basic core processor and
tweak the surrounding technology slightly for different markets. Bus
speeds, which determine how fast the chip speaks to the main memory, will
differ between product segments, for instance. Chip packaging, motherboard
design, and chipsets also will differ.
The Athlon Ultra, for instance, will be directed at the server and
workstation markets, according to sources and published reports. Ultras
will likely have faster buses but also be capable of being put
into multiprocessor processor systems. The secondary cache memory, a
performance-enhancing memory reservoir near the processor, will also be
larger on these chips.
Caches as high as 8MB will be possible, AMD executives have said. Current Xeon chips top out with 2MB of cache.
The Athlon Professional, meanwhile, will be geared toward performance
consumers and commercial desktops. It will be the same as the
chips coming out next week but will contain less cache memory and come in
single-processor systems.
Next down the food chain will be the Athlon Select, which comes in a
different package than the Professional and may not contain as many features.
My ? is, why cant amd's processers rate there speeds as they should, I have a 3800+ chip that runs at 2.4 and Intel chips run as they are
Then I found out that my on board video is taking some processer speed, if i put another video card in i can get it back from a 2.4 to a 3.2 wow i see some on needs to show me, i say intel is still woopen amds butt cause they cant get there chip to run as they say it is
Google's figured out a way to bring the power of graphics processor-powered hardware acceleration to some older computers, while Chrome 19 dev starts supporting the latest JavaScript code.
A new Apple lawsuit takes aim at Motorola Mobility in the U.S. for breaking a contract both companies have with Qualcomm for the license of one of its wireless patents.
A study by Harlequin--yes, the romantic-book people--says more women are sending naughty texts (shocking) and that 27 percent have sent a nude picture via e-mail or text.
Tor's "obfsproxy" technology would make encrypted data look innocuous and let it dodge government censors. That could help citizens in Iran reach blocked sites as antigovernment protests reportedly loom.
In spite of the boom in smartphone sales, there still seems to be a market for dedicated portable media players. Apple's iPod Touch is the leader, but what about some alternatives for the Android fans? CNET surveys the options.
Then I found out that my on board video is taking some processer speed, if i put another video card in i can get it back from a 2.4 to a 3.2 wow i see some on needs to show me, i say intel is still woopen amds butt cause they cant get there chip to run as they say it is