- Related Stories
-
Google Checkout checks in
June 29, 2006 -
Open your wallet to Google
June 28, 2006 -
Yahoo to scrap online-payment service
October 22, 2004 -
Passport glitch hits Microsoft game site
January 29, 2002 -
Commentary: Passport needs better privacy
August 23, 2001 -
Microsoft pushes Passport in Windows XP
June 21, 2001 -
Microsoft unveils e-wallet service
October 11, 1999
Privacy advocates fretted, a group of companies banded together to form a rival effort, and Microsoft Passport was scaled back after merchants failed to sign up.
Last week, Google introduced Google Checkout, an online checkout system that lets people make purchases from participating merchants using a single sign-in system. Google gives its AdWords paid search customers a discount to use the service. An icon on their ads tells shoppers they can make a fast purchase from that store.
It's a similar idea, but a different company, different time and no privacy hubbub--at least not yet. It begs the obvious question: Does the world really trust Google--the company with the "Do no evil" motto--that much more than Microsoft, the company sued by the Justice Department on antitrust grounds?
To answer the question, experts point to both the contentious period in which Microsoft launched Passport and noticeable differences in the companies' technology implementations.
"There was a lot of hullabaloo about Passport from the Electronic Privacy Information Center and others" when Microsoft introduced Passport, said Greg DeMichillie, a senior analyst at Directions on Microsoft. "A lot of that was focused on Microsoft's integration (of Passport) with Windows XP."
"It was also coming in 2001 when the Justice Department (antitrust) case was still going on against Microsoft," he said.
Passport also suffered from some security glitches and experts complained that Passport lacked adequate security protections.
In response to Passport, Sun Microsystems and others launched the Liberty Alliance in 2001 as a competing "digital identity" effort. Importantly, it was not controlled by one company.
When it came down to it, consumers didn't want to be forced to use Passport and companies didn't want Microsoft to be in control of the customer information, analysts said.
Passport initially attracted some big-name merchants, including Monster.com and eBay. But by 2005 they were gone. Passport was scaled back and now offers single sign-on for Microsoft services only. It lives on in Windows Live ID, which is part of Microsoft's latest effort to focus on Web-based services and software.
Microsoft representatives declined to be interviewed for this article.
Compare that with Google Checkout's reception so far. Privacy groups, who were quick to assail Google's contextual-based targeted ads in Gmail two years ago, have been silent. And Google already boasts a roster of affiliate merchants, including Levi Strauss, Buy.com, Ace Hardware and Starbucks.
Checkout versus Passport
So what's the difference?
"People are not required to use Google Checkout, whereas Passport was the primary payment system" for Microsoft affiliates, said Charlene Li, an analyst at Forrester Research. "It was clear that Microsoft wanted to be the only registration and shopping wallet on the merchant sites."
Google Checkout merchants, meanwhile, can offer other checkout systems if they choose.
"There is a greater level of trust with Google," Li said.
Google also has a built-in merchant base in its hundreds of thousands of AdWords customers, something Microsoft didn't have at the time.
"Google already has a relationship with these Web sites with AdWords," said DeMichillie of Directions on Microsoft. "Microsoft was coming in cold...They really ran into a wall trying to convince third parties that it was worth doing."
Of course, Microsoft wasn't the only company to have a false start with a payment service. Yahoo, Google's chief rival in search, scrapped its PayDirect payment service for its online auctions in 2004. The company still has an online checkout system called Yahoo Wallet, which is limited to people buying Yahoo premium services and products from Yahoo's small-business merchants.
Yahoo also has teamed with eBay's PayPal and will likely integrate the popular PayPal payment system into Yahoo services, a Yahoo spokeswoman said.
But Google Checkout isn't in the clear just yet, said a Liberty Alliance representative.
"Some sophisticated technologists are concerned about the volume of information that could be aggregated here (in Google Checkout)," said Roger Sullivan, vice president of the Liberty Alliance Management Board and vice president of business development for Oracle's identity management solutions. "But that is mitigated by the fact that users are becoming more savvy about the level of information they will disclose."
The Liberty Alliance would welcome Google's participation in the group, he said. It was unclear whether Google would consider working with the group.
"Anything that advances the idea of authenticated and secure users...and advances the visibility and recognition in the industry is a good thing," Sullivan said.
Google may still run into some of the opposition from merchants that led to Passport's downfall, said Li of Forrester.
"Part of me says some big merchants will be concerned about Google capturing that customer data, but some may be willing to give it up to get better conversion (to sales)," she said. "In the end, money talks and if Google checkout can make them more money, they'll use it."
See more CNET content tagged:
Google Checkout,
Checkout,
merchant,
Google AdWords,
Google Inc.
Using Zales regular checkout process the free promotional shipping was applied automatically. Also, most sites won't allow coupons or promo codes if you use Google service.
It's kinks like there that going to kill the service very quickly.
Using Zales regular checkout process the free promotional shipping was applied automatically. Also, most sites won't allow coupons or promo codes if you use Google service.
It's kinks like there that going to kill the service very quickly.
Tieing into the adwords users is a brilliant idea. But it might intice people to try to use adwords who don't know what they're doing and they'll lose a lot of money real quick. Adwords is a very risky investment for a small business if you don't know what you're doing. If you pay $1 per click and get 2000 clicks, that's $2000 you owe. Now if you get the industry standard of 1% in sales, and you sell a $20 item, You made $400, not including fees. You are now only in the hole $1600. That can happen in one day.
So I'm thinking this might be a good thing for big business, but the small guy will have to be careful.
Just my 2 cents -
Carole
CommonSenseLiving.com
Tieing into the adwords users is a brilliant idea. But it might intice people to try to use adwords who don't know what they're doing and they'll lose a lot of money real quick. Adwords is a very risky investment for a small business if you don't know what you're doing. If you pay $1 per click and get 2000 clicks, that's $2000 you owe. Now if you get the industry standard of 1% in sales, and you sell a $20 item, You made $400, not including fees. You are now only in the hole $1600. That can happen in one day.
So I'm thinking this might be a good thing for big business, but the small guy will have to be careful.
Just my 2 cents -
Carole
CommonSenseLiving.com
KM
KM
it's also scary because if successful, they really may start to have too much influence over the internet..and if Microsoft can't deal with these guys....who can?
it's also scary because if successful, they really may start to have too much influence over the internet..and if Microsoft can't deal with these guys....who can?
Robert
Robert
Google does not have any of your money, it only stores the data required to complete the purchase, not your passwords.
I think you are better of with this service because your CC number is not revealed to all these online stores with questionable security measures.
Also, you can get less SPAM by not reavealing your email address to the merchants.
The merchants will need to have your email address, after all, how exactly would they contact you if something goes wrong with your order? You still have the same potential to be spammed, you may just gain some protection if googles TOS prohibit the companies from spamming you. . . as opposed to the merchant's TOS when you register. . . which is usually worded to give them as much leeway as possible.
Google does not have any of your money, it only stores the data required to complete the purchase, not your passwords.
I think you are better of with this service because your CC number is not revealed to all these online stores with questionable security measures.
Also, you can get less SPAM by not reavealing your email address to the merchants.
The merchants will need to have your email address, after all, how exactly would they contact you if something goes wrong with your order? You still have the same potential to be spammed, you may just gain some protection if googles TOS prohibit the companies from spamming you. . . as opposed to the merchant's TOS when you register. . . which is usually worded to give them as much leeway as possible.
frivolous to say the least. Privacy? In the US, librarians are legally
bound to report to the government what books you read (bravo
that many have refused). In my latest country of choice,
Australia, privacy has flown out the window as the govt. here
just passed draconian laws destryoing privacy and human rights
e.g. the law now states that a person can be arrested for the
posession of a 'thing'. The first poor sod to be charged under
this law had posessed aerial photos of terrorists training camps.
A spy? In fact the photos were legally opbtained from a public
Israeli wesbite. Furthermore, it is the government which decides
if a defence lawyer is allowed to view the prosecution's evidence.
And Australia now has the most tapped telephones per capita
than any nation in the world, yet few here even know about it
(thanks to a tightly controlled media. Hopefully an independent
judiciary will rule against these ridiculous laws, as is inevitably
the case when they reach the higher courts.
My point is, when talking about google and privacy rights, I'd
rather trust them than any government of the new right.
frivolous to say the least. Privacy? In the US, librarians are legally
bound to report to the government what books you read (bravo
that many have refused). In my latest country of choice,
Australia, privacy has flown out the window as the govt. here
just passed draconian laws destryoing privacy and human rights
e.g. the law now states that a person can be arrested for the
posession of a 'thing'. The first poor sod to be charged under
this law had posessed aerial photos of terrorists training camps.
A spy? In fact the photos were legally opbtained from a public
Israeli wesbite. Furthermore, it is the government which decides
if a defence lawyer is allowed to view the prosecution's evidence.
And Australia now has the most tapped telephones per capita
than any nation in the world, yet few here even know about it
(thanks to a tightly controlled media. Hopefully an independent
judiciary will rule against these ridiculous laws, as is inevitably
the case when they reach the higher courts.
My point is, when talking about google and privacy rights, I'd
rather trust them than any government of the new right.
I think google threat to Microsoft is just like creating a analogy between OS and a application running on it.
Google work is just 15-20% of work microssoft does?
And its like everybody likes to enjoy a falling star but only till the time when they see its actually falling on them.
Kalpesh
I think google threat to Microsoft is just like creating a analogy between OS and a application running on it.
Google work is just 15-20% of work microssoft does?
And its like everybody likes to enjoy a falling star but only till the time when they see its actually falling on them.
Kalpesh
- Message has been deleted.
-
by
April 24, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- Just another Mac guy
-
by nmcphers
July 5, 2006 8:34 AM PDT
- I'm an Apple fan, but what was the point of that random link to Apple's new educational iMac?
-
-
- nothing like passport
-
by df561
July 5, 2006 9:07 AM PDT
- Passport tried to be a universal -login- Google Checkout is like having another credit card. That's why it's called "Checkout" excellent naming decision...it really makes it clear what they are up to.
-
-
(33 Comments)So to compare it to Passport is way off. It is better to compare it to Paypal Merchant services...and PayPal is certainly successful.