August 27, 2006 4:00 PM PDT
Google offers hosted communications apps
- Related Stories
-
Google welcomes Writely sign-ups
August 21, 2006 -
Google Spreadsheets turns up heat on Excel
June 5, 2006 -
Google unveils Web-based calendar app
April 12, 2006
Video:
Google thinks small business
Take a first look at Google Apps for Your Domain
The new service is an extension of Gmail for Your Domain, a service that Google launched in beta version in February. It allows organizations to use Gmail applications with their own e-mail address, instead of the "@gmail.com" domain.
The Gmail for Your Domain test service has tens of thousands of active domains, hundreds of thousands of users and hundreds of universities registered to use it, said Dave Girouard, vice president and general manager of Google's enterprise business.
The Google Apps for Your Domain service will allow organizations to outsource their communications applications to Google and to customize the user interface with their own branding and color scheme. Administrators will have access to an English-language Web-based control panel to do things like manage the user account list and set up aliases and distribution lists.
A premium edition with support and additional storage will be available by the end of the year for a fee, Girouard said. He declined to provide more details.
See more CNET content tagged:
Google Apps, Gmail, Google Inc., organization
13 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
With this apps is obviously that they will soon or later will offer hosting for businesses.
So my question now. How do we all google partners should react and prepare?
But Google doesn't provide enough Trddition-Chinese web interface, so Google can not get lot customer of Taiwan.
I love Google those service, bcoz it's a good tool for people who don't want to maintain mail server.
Seriously, if I could use my gmail as webhosting the way fastmail does it...oh man. I mean, I have a great webhost (theicy.net), but bandwidth is ALWAYS a problem. I'm sure google could provide more than enough :)
I think its a good aproach by Google, however for "pro" use - i would suggest Microsoft's Office Live (atleast until ORCA is ready with our Office package)
Google is not alone..
----------------------
Team ORCA is also going to offer our applications free of charge - some of these can be tested in our "proff of concept" Beta 1 demo at www.orcadesktop.com/proton - with this i would like to hear what others think.
Kind Regards
Leon Bollerup
CEO, Team ORCA
info@orcadesktop.com
this is really going to be an interesting battle with Google.
But if you follow best practices this is not a problem. If you want to link span thier engine... This is a massive problem. Your search engine I will guess is something you hold a stake in. lol
The Google strategy to defend against the Microsoft search threat is to attack Microsoft's strength, Microsoft Office. The mere threat of Google Office added to the existence of Open Office, has been enough to push Microsoft into a full commitment to some sort of online version of Office, an Office Live. Defend Office at all costs, please, Ray Ozzie! The amusing thing is that Google has pulled this off at very little cost, almost as a frolic.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192300431" target="_newWindow">http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192300431</a>
has quoted Jeff Raikes, President of Microsoft's business division, as saying "Google is dabbling in Web-based productivity"; this article also states, "The Google solution is what I'd call patchwork, or Frankenstein, software," says Tom Rizzo, a director for Office SharePoint Server at Microsoft. "You have to put it all together yourself.". Against the old adge whisch states that "EXPERIENCE IS A GREAT TEACHER" I would therefore opt to bet the farm on fact that since it was IBM/Lotus who were the first I believe to bring "Web-based Productivity Applications" in the name of Lotus "KONA"; then, it is this working experience that one might suspect that Microsoft will draw from having knowledge of the inner workings of early IBM/Lotus efforts at Web-based Productivity Applications and having worked closely with IBM on the development of the OS/2 Operating System for which the Web-based productivity applications were targeted. Maybe, this would have been the time for (Lotus Symphony The follow-up to killer app 1-2-3, this '80s package (which) never took off) :-D
vs. Me: I sell networking, services, infrastructure. I can be threatened if I view Google Apps For Your Domain as a replacement for the server-based communications I'm installing from Novell and Microsoft. If a small business can get e-mail, calendaring and e-comm for free, why should they buy a server and pay to have some schmuck keep it running?
My bigger concern is that this is the desktop-publishing or FrontPage of the e-comm set. DTP and FrontPage cheapened publishing and Web development by dumping tools on the market. I hope that GAFYD doesn't become that, making it harder to sell the value of real communications systems.
vs. Microsoft: Go get 'em! And good luck. If you view MSoft as a necessary evil, they will always be there. We've made them part of our corporate fabric. Noboby opens a document, they start Word (R) Microsoft Corporation. When was the last time you heard someone ask for an on-screen presentation? I even slip and call the process PowerPoint(R) Microsoft Corporation. "Start OpenOffice's Impress tool and start creating a PowerPoint presentation." Oops.
Want to get rid of Microsoft? Stop designing apps and systems that rely on them. Apps that only use SQL Server, systems that only integrate with Outlook? Don't build 'em and don't buy 'em. Hook into others, support open source, spread the love.
vs. Google: I've enjoyed Google and their inventiveness. They are truly remarkable. But are they diluting themselves? Are they are search firm (Google Earth IS about searching the world), a tools firm (Sketch, Writely, GAFYD) or a bunch of really smart people having fun with technology but not holding the tiller?