In a bid to boost its presence in advertising, Microsoft said Friday that it will pay $6 billion to acquire Aquantive, a digital marketing and services company.
The deal is Microsoft's largest ever, highlighting the importance of supporting more-advanced advertising products and technologies across areas including media planning, video on demand and Internet Protocol television. Aquantive produces the Atlas Media Console and Drive PM tools for advertisers and publishers, and owns interactive ad agency Avenue A Razorfish.
"The advertising industry is evolving and growing at an incredible pace, moving increasingly toward online and IP-served platforms, which dramatically increases the importance of software for this industry," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in a statement. "Today's announcement represents the next step in the evolution of our ad network from our initial investment in MSN, to the broader Microsoft network including Xbox Live, Windows Live and Office Live, and now to the full capacity of the Internet."
Microsoft said it will pay $66.50 per share for Aquantive, an 85 percent premium over its Thursday closing price of $35.87.
"The shift to online marketing has at last begun. We in the industry have been talking about the shift away from traditional media into online for the last 10 years," Shar VanBoskirk, a Forrester Research analyst, said in a statement. "I think the intensity and price tag of these acquisitions indicates that some very big media and agency firms are staking their bets online."
Aquantive, which was founded in 1997, has about 2,600 employees and is based in Seattle.
One analyst said Microsoft may have had to act fast, before all players in the market were snapped up. But challenges still exist for Microsoft if it is to fully capitalize on the purchase.
"Like Google's acquisition, Microsoft is trying to expand out and they're aware they're behind," said Brendan Barnicle, a Pacific Crest Securities analyst. "Microsoft has been struggling with MSN and this category for a while."
"This merger will be going on with a Windows Live overlay, and that's a concern," Barnicle said. "Microsoft has been going back and forth with Windows Live, and this deal will add more moving parts for them."
With the acquisition, Microsoft is aiming to offer advertisers, publishers and advertising agencies a soup-to-nuts approach in selecting digital advertising, services and technology tools that can be applied on Microsoft's network and, beyond that, to any Web site or distribution channel, such as Internet TV and video-on-demand.
Aquantive offers digital marketing services through its Avenue A Razorfish company, as well as digital marketing technologies through its Atlas operation. Aquantive also operates Drive Performance Media, which buys online ad inventory en masse and resells it to advertisers based on the groups they wish to target.
Aquantive's Atlas operations, which run a family of ad servers, compete directly with DoubleClick, while its Drive PM ranks No. 8 among ad network companies, Gartner analysts said.
The deal, which is expected to close in the second half of this year, will bring together two complimentary companies without a lot of overlap, Microsoft executives said during a conference call with analysts on Friday.
One aspect especially important about the acquisition is Aquantive's Avenue A Razorfish company. The deal will not only give Microsoft a new presence in the ad services business but will also help promote its new rich media and video plug-in Silverlight, the Gartner analysts noted.
The buyout is the largest Microsoft has done to date, with the next-largest transaction falling in the $2 billion range.
"We are willing to buy companies regardless of their size, if we can drive growth faster through an acquisition than internally. We have done this for smaller acquisitions and are willing to do it for larger ones too," Chris Liddell, Microsoft's chief financial officer, said during a conference call with analysts.
He added, however, that the acquisition must be strategically compelling.
"The market opportunities with this deal is in the tens of billions of dollars," Liddell said.
Okay, this is getting ridiculous. I mean, is Aquantive REALLY worth $6 Billion?? Isn't this just a way for Microsoft to say, "'neener neener' We paid more money for an ad company than Google did 'nyah'!"
I mean, no matter HOW deep your pockets are, spending an extra Billion or Two seems ludicrously insane by ANYONE's standards. Would Aquantive have balked at the mere paltry sum of $4B or even $3.5B??
Okay, my new theoretical law (assuming someone hasn't already theorized about it), is that since the original DotCom Bubble Burst was around early 2000, and this new Burst is BOUND to happen within the next two months or two buyouts (whichever comes first), then start your betting now that Bubble Burst #3 should happen around say, September 2014?
Geez, don't we learn ANYTHING from past mistakes??
If aquantive would have agree in lesser price microst would never give them more!!! Its a business,,and till today people were saying that they are very never spend money on anything and when they did people again saying they are foolish...
Okay, this *is* getting ridiculous. I mean, Google buys something --> cool, great, they know what they are doing, more great products for us, learn, Microsoft!; Microsoft buys something --> ridiculous! why?! this is just show-off! You people ever heard of consistency?
$6 billion for an on-line ad company? Ballmer, Gates and company are striving for world domination against up-start Google who is eating their lunches. Not that the pudgy & pasty Ballmer can't afford to miss a few meals, they can't stand losing out "any" revenue from advertising. God only knows how deprived we'd all be if not for the crappy feature-packed unbiquity of all the MS applicatons
There's a great profile of CEO Brian McAndrews on www.washingtonceo.com: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://washingtonceo.com/index.php?id=90&tx_ttnews" target="_newWindow">http://washingtonceo.com/index.php?id=90&tx_ttnews</a>[tt_news]=759&tx_ttnews[backPid]=103&cHash=b863026d8a
We all know the story already: anything Google buys is good and worth the money; anything Microsoft buys is bad and overpayed. Any way you cut it, Microsoft always has to be the one company who's wrong.
Big bux means world has shifted: smart money's on Internet becoming dominant economic, social, and political force. The implications are far-reaching and profound. Traditional centers of power cannot hold.
Web giant is spending $120 million to beef up its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, according to filings with the city reviewed by the San Jose Mercury News.
The Samsung Galaxy mini 2 S6500 could make its debut at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona later this month, according to a leaked promotional image.
Tor's "obfsproxy" technology would make encrypted data look innocuous and let it dodge government censors. That could help citizens in Iran reach blocked sites as antigovernment protests reportedly loom.
MIT creates a simulation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Spacewar. A relic of the early days of minicomputers, it was one of the first computer video games and set the stage for many others, including Asteroids.
George Lucas has just released his version of "Star Wars" in 3D, but c'mon--the guy believes Greedo shot first. Why not make your own Star Wars world? In the first installment of a Crave series, a crack team of crafters fight the power and turn paper bags into the Rebel Alliance's Admiral Ackbar. It's a sack!
I mean, no matter HOW deep your pockets are, spending an extra Billion or Two seems ludicrously insane by ANYONE's standards. Would Aquantive have balked at the mere paltry sum of $4B or even $3.5B??
Okay, my new theoretical law (assuming someone hasn't already theorized about it), is that since the original DotCom Bubble Burst was around early 2000, and this new Burst is BOUND to happen within the next two months or two buyouts (whichever comes first), then start your betting now that Bubble Burst #3 should happen around say, September 2014?
Geez, don't we learn ANYTHING from past mistakes??
Its a business,,and till today people were saying that they are very never spend money on anything and when they did people again saying they are foolish...
You people ever heard of consistency?
are striving for world domination against up-start Google who is
eating their lunches. Not that the pudgy & pasty Ballmer can't
afford to miss a few meals, they can't stand losing out "any"
revenue from advertising. God only knows how deprived we'd all be
if not for the crappy feature-packed unbiquity of all the MS
applicatons
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://washingtonceo.com/index.php?id=90&tx_ttnews" target="_newWindow">http://washingtonceo.com/index.php?id=90&tx_ttnews</a>[tt_news]=759&tx_ttnews[backPid]=103&cHash=b863026d8a
Google spends less, and gets more out of what they buy.
For that matter, Google buys better companies, and spooks others into over-paying for lesser companies.
Any way you cut it, Google wins.
Any way you cut it, Microsoft always has to be the one company who's wrong.