Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

September 23, 2006 4:02 AM PDT

Google relents, publishes Belgian court ruling

  • 2 comments

The decision is a reversal from its previous refusal to comply with the court's order.

The story "Google relents, publishes Belgian court ruling" published September 23, 2006 at 4:02 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register)
publishers should comply with internet standards
by hadaso September 24, 2006 1:42 AM PDT
publishers should comply with internet standards. Whan a publisher uses internet protocols to serve content, there are implications. Internet standards define what to do with the material. Http headers misght define a timeframe for caching the file that the publisher's webserver sends to Google's client (googlebot) and that is an explicit permision by the copyright holder to do just that.

There are also convention in the network. There are ways to setup a website. If a website holder wishes to disallow googlebot from indexing parts of the website, the sebsite owners tells googlebot just this in the standard way: using a robots.txt file to define what is indexable by which bot. They may also configure their web server not to respond to googlebot requests by sending the copyrighted materials. What happens when googlebot approaches a website is that googlebot first asks if there are any published restrictions on indexing by requesting those (requesting the robots.txt file). Then if there are no restrictions googlebot identifies itself as googlebot and politely asks the webserver to "please send the content of this file to this port of mine" using the http language (protocol). Finaly, if the webserver was configured to respond positively to googlebot's requests then it sends the content with http headers describing how it should be treated in a format that the webserver operator has agreed to coply to by using the protocol. All this constitutes explicit permision for Google to use the copyrighted material in certain limited ways.

If those publishers do not wish to give those permisions, they should not do so. No one forces them to use the web. If they want to they should understand what they are doing.
Reply to this comment
100 % Correct and Well Explained
by pcpimpster September 24, 2006 8:49 AM PDT
I find it hilarious google or any other company can even be sued for adding value to the web sites it links to for no cost to the host.

Maybe these "news" orgs should just stick to selling their warez on paper. I would hope they have a better understanding of that ancient form for peddling their crap headlines.

Eww my fingers are black.
Reply to this comment
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Google (0.97%) 5.65 588.65
Dow Jones Industrials (1.10%) 113.97 10,458.81
S&P 500 (1.05%) 11.49 1,107.12
NASDAQ (1.20%) 25.63 2,170.23
CNET TECH (1.09%) 17.14 1,592.02
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right