- Related Stories
-
Amnesty International targets China cooperation
July 19, 2006 -
Yahoo pressured over China cooperation
April 12, 2006 -
Yang speaks on Yahoo's China policy
March 8, 2006 -
Proposed law targets tech-China cooperation
February 16, 2006 -
Politicians lash out at tech firms over China
February 15, 2006 -
Congress looks askance at firms that bow to China
January 12, 2006 -
Group says Yahoo helped jail Chinese journalist
September 6, 2005
Rights group accuses Western Internet companies of complicity with censorship in China.
The story "Rights group calls Net firms 'censors' in China" published August 9, 2006 at 10:30 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.




the law does not, nor does it claim to, represent a metric for
moral judgement. If it did, that means that slavery was morally
right prior to the 14th amendment.
And Hitler was right to exterminate the Jews because it was OK
under the current Nazi regime.
And no one had any moral obligation not to do business with
them.
And the US was right to inter Japanese Americans during WWII.
So yes, some people ARE saying that they should stay and break
the law.
It must be kept in mind, however, that what constitutes the "law"
in China is often a grey area. In fact, China, purposely,has veery
little codified in this regard. Instead, they rely on extra-legal
scare tactics and trumped up, ancillary charges to enforce their
will.