- Related Stories
-
Firm formerly known as Gator looks for credibility
February 14, 2005 -
Adware anxiety gives Claria cold feet
August 12, 2004 -
Gator, L.L. Bean dispute to be reheard
April 30, 2004 -
Harvard study wrestles with Gator
May 22, 2003
An executive from Claria, formerly called Gator, will be one of 20 members of the committee, the department said Wednesday.
"This committee will provide the department with important recommendations on how to further the department's mission while protecting the privacy of personally identifiable information of citizens and visitors of the United States," Nuala O'Connor Kelly, the department's chief privacy officer, said in a statement.
Claria bundles its pop-up advertising software with ad-supported networks such as Kazaa. Recently, the privately held company has been trying to seek credibility by following stricter privacy guidelines and offering behavioral profiling services to its partners.
In an e-mail message to CNET News.com, Kelly defended the inclusion of a Claria representative on the committee. "I am proud of, supportive of and grateful for those individuals in the public and private sector who are willing to take on the hard tasks, fight the good fight, and who surprise us with creative, fresh and unconventional thinking, and who make change where change is needed through their hard work and personal dedication," Kelly said.In the past, Claria's pop-up ad software has riled some users who claimed it was annoying, installed without permission, and not easy to delete. Publishers also were irked about pop-up ads for a rival's product appearing next to their own Web sites. Catalog retailer L.L. Bean sued Gator for alleged trademark infringement.
Claria's representative on the Homeland Security privacy board is company Vice President D. Reed Freeman, a former Federal Trade Commission staff attorney. Other members include executives from Intel, Computer Associates International, IBM, Oracle and the Cato Institute.
Kelly said Freeman will "bring his courage and conviction to the board, and will contribute productively--and constructively--to the board's and the public's dialogue on privacy and homeland security."The committee is tasked with providing "external expert advice to the secretary and the chief privacy officer on programmatic, policy, operational and technological issues that affect privacy, data integrity and data interoperability."
In February 2003, Gator settled a high-profile case brought by The Washington Post, The New York Times, Dow Jones and other media companies. Terms of that deal were quiet, but Claria appears to have stopped delivering pop-ups to those publishers' sites.
Claria did not immediately respond to a request for comment.CNET News.com's Stefanie Olsen contributed to this report.
See more CNET content tagged:
Claria Corp.,
Gator,
chief privacy officer,
online publisher,
committee





To all you tech guys: Think about it... What better way to track Internet activitys than with an actual client application which is allready in place on a vast majority of people's computers.
Not trying to be paranoid, and I know very well that if they wanted to, they could track anywhere we go anyway. But wouldn't this make it all the easier?
Just a thought :)
Nearly all of Gator/Claria users/victims were tricked into installing it. Over 90% are unaware of it's presence in their machine, and not a single person would voluntarilly keep it once they learn about it's ability to download/execute arbitrary pieces of software in their machines without even warning them.
Being commercial does not make it less of a Trojan !
Robert
This is really the only reason I can think of that would be a reason they would allow them in. It is a pretty nifty idea. They may not be able to use the information in a court of law, but they can use it to get an idea of who to watch more closely.
Robert
- Claria on Federal Privacy Council - now that is a kick in the soft parts!
-
by lonny paul
March 26, 2005 6:51 AM PST
- When will the US citizens remember that the govt is supposed to be made up of people who speak for US and not for big business? There were over 20 companies suing Claria @ one time all for being trademark violating, adware installing internet leeches. Nothing has changed aside from them settling 99% of their lawsuits and quietly changing their name.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)They continue to argue they do not promote active x installations of their product - however I know people infected daily. HEY MR. PRESIDENT, INSTEAD OF WORRYING ABOUT THE CRAP IN THE REST OF THE WORLD - GET THE SPYWARE PEOPLE OFF THE PRIVACY COUNCIL. ARE YOU NUTZ!