- Related Stories
-
Kazaa parent forms P2P alliance
July 2, 2003 -
P2P alliance to counter RIAA?
July 1, 2003 -
File-sharing networks infight in sight?
June 5, 2003 -
Altnet to pay Kazaa users for swapping
June 1, 2003 -
Kazaa strikes back at Hollywood, labels
January 27, 2003 -
Judge: Kazaa can be sued in U.S.
January 10, 2003
In the ruling, dated July 2, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson dismissed Sharman's argument that major entertainment companies have colluded to drive potential online rivals out of business, saying the company lacks any standing to make such a claim. Sharman does not provide movies and music online but rather distributes software that allows individuals to swap digital files, the judge said.
"Sharman is neither a competitor nor customer in the restrained market, and because its industry is incidental, and not integral, to the alleged anticompetitive scheme," Wilson wrote in the ruling.
The entertainment industry last year
Sharman countersued in February,
"Altnet, not Sharman, is the primary target of the conduct alleged and would suffer the principal injury," concluded the judge in last week's ruling. "Accordingly, Altnet has the greatest motivation to enforce the antitrust laws in the form of a private claim, thereby further diminishing any justification for allowing Sharman to do so."
Sharman, which is based in Australia, could not be reached for comment.




