U.S. cooks up most spam

Want to know the biggest exporter in the world's spam trade? Here's a hint: It's the country with one of the newest laws regulating it.

According to security software firm Sophos, roughly 43 percent of spam sent around the globe originates from the United States, which enacted the federal Can-Spam Act in January to criminalize e-mail fraud.

That percentage dwarfs the junk e-mail coming from South Korea and China, the second- and third-largest sources, respectively. South Korea accounts for 15 percent of the world's spam and China, 12 percent, according to a report from Sophos released Tuesday. Brazil is the fourth-largest exporter of spam at 6 percent.

"Almost nine months on from the Can-Spam legislation and the United States' attempt to clean up its act appears to have had little impact," Graham Cluley, Sophos' senior technology consultant, said in a statement.

Since it became law in December, Can-Spam has failed to push back the rising flood of spam. What's more, a majority of e-mail marketers are not complying fully with the new law, research has shown.

Spam accounts for more than 65 percent of all e-mail processed by mail servers, according to Symantec, a security company that recently bought Brightmail, a spam-filtering company.

Sophos came up with its percentages by scanning spam messages received at e-mail accounts, or "honey pots," set up around the world. According to the report, Canada has managed to cut the amount of spam originating from its country by half, from 6.8 percent six months ago to 2.9 percent at present.

It also said "zombie" PCs, or computers exploited by a virus or hacker to automatically send junk mail, are delivering 40 percent of spam across the globe. "Many of the computers sending out spam are likely to have had their broadband Internet connections exploited by remote hackers," Cluley said.

[richard-s]

Spam Damages Overseas Image of USA

The USA feels under threat from overseas. People in USA feel that the world (wrongly) blames the USA for everything that is bad.

However, my image of the USA increasingly results from all the horrid spam that I receive daily; peddling everthing from fake pills to extreme perversions. This article confirms that most spam originates from the USA or from USA companies.

Stopping the revolting tide of spam would do more at a stroke to improve the USA's image, and hence to increase its national security, than many of the ineffective measures brought in since 9/11.

Surely the USA Department of Home Security should act quickly to stop this major threat to the security of the USA?

Reports suggest that fewer than 200 people are responsibly for the bulk of the spam and therefore for the bulk of the resulting damage to the USA's image.

Is there space for them at Guantánamo?

Richard