SANTIAGO, Chile--The body managing the Internet's vital naming system, which has been lambasted about its closed-door activities since its inception last year, is engaged in the grueling process of opening up its powerful circle to the broader Net community.
At an international meeting here, the Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers (ICANN) spent a large
part of its session yesterday listening to advice about how to set up geographically diverse at-large worldwide membership.
The at-large membership arm of ICANN is supposed to have equal footing with
large corporations and technical standards bodies to influence ICANN policy
and to elect board members. The first election by the at-large group is
expected to take place sometime next year.
The board also will consider a proposal today to
recognize a separate noncommercial constituency, composed of organizations
such as nonprofit groups and educational entities, which also will have the
power to shape ICANN policy.
Both issues are critical to ICANN's quest to win the support of Net users. Online and off, many observers of the ICANN process have complained that the body already has made too many decisions without the at-large body in place.
"Decisions are being made by ICANN that affect individuals on the Net, but
it's very difficult to participate in this process right now," said Alan
Davidson, staff counsel at the Center for
Democracy and Technology.
Aside from a static comments page on its Web site, some stakeholders have
said that there is no meaningful way for individuals or non-business
entities to help mold ICANN policies, which will affect the rights of
every business or individual who registers a Net name, the primary portals
to information and commerce online.
For its part, ICANN is trying to broaden the spectrum of participants.
Already, ICANN staff has rejected the notion that only domain name holders
be able to participate in the process.
"ICANN's policy decisions on [the domain name system] and other issues extend well beyond the population of domain name holders," according to a staff report.
The moves by ICANN this week also mark the latest step away from U.S.
control over the domain name system. ICANN was recognized by the U.S.
government to administer the Net's core technical functions and to foster
in competition to Network Solutions,
which turned a six-year government contract into a billion-dollar business
primarily through its more than 5 million ".com," ".org," and ".net"
registrations.
The ICANN board is set to vote tomorrow on a blueprint for creating a
minimum 5,000-person at-large membership that will select 9 directors
to the ICANN board, expanding the body to 18 members. Members would have to
have an email address, physical address, verifiable citizenship, and the
financial ability to support the at-large membership.
Still, it is unclear exactly how ICANN will harness people to participate in the at-large membership. Some here suggested that Net name registrars reach out to their customers, while others say that a public service campaign needs to be launched.
"There is a way to build an at-large membership by utilizing the medium,"
said Ken Stubbs, chairman of CORE
(the Internet Council of Registrars), who said that Net access providers
should educate their customers about ICANN at the at-large electorate.
However, it costs money to launch campaigns and to run elections--a huge obstacle for ICANN, which has been hard-pressed to garner money to
run its own corporation.
Moreover, there will be a cost associated with being a member because ICANN
has said it won't foot the bill. The mechanism for raising this money has
not been worked out yet, either, but ICANN staff pointed out in their
report that a standard nonprofit membership fee is $25 to $50 per person
per year. ICANN is hopeful that a nonprofit such as the Markle Foundation
will fund the initial outreach and election.
"We're getting some constructive suggestions about how to do this. Now all
we need is the funding," said Esther Dyson, chair of ICANN's interim board.
Join the conversation
Comment replyThe posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.
A lawsuit from Swiss company SmartData alleges that three of Apple's products infringe on one of SmartData's patents, while saying Apple ignored pleas to strike a licensing deal.
A 15-year-old complains on Facebook about the domestic chores she has to do. She whines about her parents in general. So her Dad, who works in IT, takes her laptop outside and blasts it.
A German judge has ruled in favor of Apple in one of several patent suits with Motorola, finding that iPhone maker did not violate a patent related to 3G/UMTS wireless communications.
Join the conversation