How objective are the results you get when you go to your favorite search
engines? That's the question raised by a new Open Text Index search engine that
recently began selling Web sites "preferred" status in its index so that
their site is more likely to show up in results.
Search engines allow users to query vast
indexes of Web sites to locate information, but they often generate
dizzying amounts of data that can be overwhelming. Many engines uses
"relevancy rankings" that attempt to indicate how relevant the
result is to the query. Web publishers, on the other hand, want search
engines to help their sites rise above the sea of results,
relevant or not.
Open Text is offering to help those publishers by allowing them premium
slots in its search engine without requiring them to buy more expensive advertising
banners. Under the company's Preferred Listing service, a merchant that
sells personal computers online, for
example, could ensure that its Web site appears as the top listing in searches for the terms PC and computer.
The approach has already created controversy since a marketing
representative for Open Text posted information about the service on an
email broadcast list. The information later ignited a debate in a separate
email discussion group, called Online-News. Open Text supporters say that search engines aren't
obligated to maintain editorial objectivity in the same way that journalists
are.
"Everybody expects The New York Times
to adhere to journalistic integrity, but I don't think it should be anyone's
expectation of a search engine on the Internet," said Rosalind Resnick,
president of Net software and marketing company NetCreations.
Open Text, which also sells off-the-shelf search engine technology to
businesses, defends its practice because Preferred Listings clearly flags
paid-for entries with special icons and mixes non-paid Web sites with the preferred ones. The company compares the service to the phone company's yellow pages in that both are comprehensive listings that give bigger ads and more prominent placement to
advertisers who pay for the privilege.
"This service was in response to market demand. I have so many people
calling me saying, 'Can we pay you to be in the top-ten results?' Eighty-five percent
of our
users will only look at the first ten results of a search," said Lilly
Buchwitz, marketing manager for Open Text Index. "I've had some people say
we're compromising our integrity, but it's exactly like the yellow pages."
But at least one other Net search engine says that comparison is not entirely accurate.
"Open Text Index represents itself to reveal Web sites in a relevant order.
With the yellow pages, listings are delivered alphabetically. There's no
illusion there," said Bob Davis, CEO of Lycos. "To me, this damages the integrity of
the search service. This is like librarians putting books on the end [of a
bookshelf] if you pay her some extra money. We would not do it with Lycos."
Other industry observers see the Open Text service as being akin to
advertorials, the paid-for promotional stories that adorn magazines.
"A real danger comes when you start mixing advertising in with your
editorial," said Margie Wylie, editor at industry newsletter Digital Media. "While it might be
cheesy, it's not entirely deceptive. That division between editorial and
advertising is more important on the Web than ever. If you lose your
credibility, you lose your stock in trade because you're selling information."
MIT creates a simulation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Spacewar. A relic of the early days of minicomputers, it was one of the first computer video games and set the stage for many others, including Asteroids.
With Windows 8 now on a clearer path to release, expect the big device makers to try to crash the raucous Apple party with Microsoft leading the way. And who knows? Microsoft may even steer buyers away from a next-generation 9-inch Kindle Fire.
AstrologyDating.com is a new site that tries to find you your perfect love on the basis of birth date, birth time, and birthplace. But will it tell you the truth? Well, it asks you to pay only per match. So I tried it.
The Web fulminates when it is revealed that executives from VEVO--vehement music industry antipirates--played a pirated stream of an NFL playoff game at a party. VEVO claims it left its Wi-Fi unsupervised. Have we heard that argument before?
Tor's "obfsproxy" technology would make encrypted data look innocuous and let it dodge government censors. That could help citizens in Iran reach blocked sites as antigovernment protests reportedly loom.
iPhones and Angry Birds aside, the arcade endures. Crave pays a visit--and offers up an homage to games and gamers of years past and a tribute to the possibly endangered, but not yet dead, atmosphere of the arcade itself.
Join the conversation