Version: 2008
  • On CHOW: Groundbreaking hangover cure

June 25, 2004 6:41 AM PDT

Smart systems will erase jobs, report warns

  • 7 comments
So-called smart applications will soon cause more job losses than outsourcing, and policymakers will need to tread cautiously to minimize the effect of this new trend, a new report warns.

In the coming years, a large number of first-level jobs in service industries related to customer service, help desk and directory assistance will be lost due to the advent of intelligent systems, research firm Strategy Analytics said in the report.

This wave of job losses will follow the elimination of as many as 10 million jobs involving physical labor and repetitive activities that were wiped out in the last 10 years as machines began to replace humans, the report noted.

During the same period, there was a cumulative investment of $100 billion in robotics and supporting systems. Today, nearly 1 million robots are in operation in manufacturing and service sectors globally.

In the United States alone, there was an erosion of 50 percent blue-collar jobs due to automation, robotics and information technology between 1969 and 1999.

According to Harvey Cohen, who authored the study, another threat is yet to emerge. For a growing segment of the work force with midrange skills, the further expansion of intelligent systems into capabilities involving decision making, advisory functions, identification and analytical functions will mean further limiting of job potential.

"While these systems are not likely to replace humans altogether," he noted, "they will become capable of shifting the mix of personnel required to support a given level of business or activity, thus reducing the total number of people required."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I want a human
by waynehapp June 25, 2004 8:42 AM PDT
I don't know about anyone else--but when I checkout of the store I want a human. I find these automatic checkout machines wildly irritating.
Reply to this comment
Checkout lines
by mndtempleton June 25, 2004 9:00 AM PDT
Why should you have to "checkout" in the first place. Let RFIDs and other smart tracking systems work in conjunction to automatically deduct the cost from your account as you step out of the store.
View reply
Smart systems will change jobs, not erase them
by mndtempleton June 25, 2004 8:56 AM PDT
The world used to be focused on manufacturing. We've become so good at it that we need fewer and fewer people to create the ever growing amount of products that we consume. That is progress.

Now the world is focusing its attention on services, and we will certainly become better at serving more people while using fewer resources. That is also progress.

What comes next? What will we do as the mundane, repetitive tasks (both physical and logical) no longer require as much human intervention? Will we all go on more vacations? Probably not.

Instead, we will have to focus our attentions on the things that cannot yet be automated. Art, entertainment, pure scientific research, and applied science may all play pivotal roles on the economy.

So, be prepared. Do your blue-or-white-collar job better and cheaper than anyone else, or get ready to move on. The positions of the future can exist, but you will still have to work hard for them. It is called "work" after all.
Reply to this comment
Efficiency
by June 25, 2004 9:22 AM PDT
I was about to reply to this article and say very much the same as you did, here.

Many people fear losing their jobs to machines and computers. There have been whole literary resources devoted to this exact subject (albeit in a much more apochryfal setting).

In my opinion, fewer mindless jobs simply encourage workers to use their minds more. There isn't a single person on this planet (within reason) who isn't capable of excelling at at least one job. In order for that person to reach their full potential as not only a worker, but also as an individual, they must pursue their own abilities and interests.

I can guarnatee that someone doing what they're good at, and what they enjoy doing, will be much happier than someone who works at what they hate and are only as good as the next man at. We are a skilled species, and yet most of us work at skill-less jobs.

What is the purpose of work? Efficiency. What is efficiency? More results, less work. In our growing world, we need more efficiency, and machines, at this time, are the answer.

Let's finally put the Industrial Revolution to rest.
Creative destruction........
by rshimizu12 June 25, 2004 9:55 AM PDT
Automation displace many workers, but it will create opportuntities for many new jobs. Ultimately it comes down to supply and demand. Automation allows businesses to lower their cost of doing business. This in turn facilatates a more efficent allocation of resources for new business opportunities. The key is to break down government beauracy.
Reply to this comment
Shallow and Short-sighted Report
by LANjackal June 25, 2004 11:10 AM PDT
Ha! Obviously the persons who wrote that report have never tried to use automated directory assistance before.

It's great when you're doing reservations on an airline's phone services, because the lexicon in such a situation is limited to flight-related terms.

The whole experience deteriorates when it comes to "yellow pages" telephone directory assistance. I was forced to use such a system in Florida via Cingular, my mobile provider. The system had trouble recongnizing the word "McDonalds" and cut me off after I asked for the number for the "Southwest Airlines". Thank God I got back to Houston where a real person answers the 411 call.

In any case, the more intelligent systems there are, the more people will be needed to maintain them, correct errors, and develop new ones. Anyone familiar with robotics and AI knows just how underperforming - relative to the wild predictions of so-called pundits - those fields often turn out to be. Current speech recognition technology is in the upper 90th percentile with regard to accuracy, but at the rate at which humans speak, even that is intolerable.

Contrary to what the study says, jobs aren't disappearing. They're simply moving upward. Progress cannot be legislated against. These "analysts" need to stop watching their Matrix DVDs on the weekend when they're trashed and get back to the real world. Get with the program.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (2.03%) 203.52 10,226.94
S&P 500 (2.22%) 23.78 1,093.08
NASDAQ (1.97%) 41.62 2,154.06
CNET TECH (2.03%) 31.22 1,569.62
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right