October 1, 2002 4:00 PM PDT
Web shoppers' new option: Bill me later
- Related Stories
-
7-Eleven puts Net shopping in stores
May 23, 2002 -
Amazon takes aim at large-scale buyers
August 22, 2001 -
Customers better start spilling their Beenz
August 16, 2001 -
E-currency site Flooz goes offline
August 9, 2001
Some seven Internet merchants, including MyMusic.com, have been testing the new feature, which was developed by start-up company I4 Commerce, since earlier this year.
On Tuesday, payment-processing company CyberSource announced that it has integrated the "bill me later" feature into its service and has begun marketing it to its merchant clients, which include Home Depot, Overstock.com and Nike.
The service should attract customers who can't or won't use a credit card online and encourage them to return, said Steve Klebe, vice president of strategic alliances at CyberSource.
"From what I've seen, this is one of the few alternative payment types that has its act together," Klebe said.
The "bill me later" feature works much like a credit card, said Mark Lavelle, vice president of business development for I4 Commerce. After entering their billing address during the checkout process, shoppers click on the "bill me later" button. Instead of asking for a credit card number, the service asks consumers to enter their date of birth and occasionally the last four digits of their Social Security number, Lavelle said.
I4 pays the merchant, then within 10 to 15 days after the buyers complete their initial transaction, I4 will send them a bill for all of their "bill me later" transactions during that time period, Lavelle said. They can either pay the full bill at once or pay a portion of it. I4 charges 17.9 percent interest on any outstanding balances, he said. Much like a credit card company, I4 will bill customers on a monthly basis.
I4 figures its service will be attractive to both consumers and merchants, Lavelle said. Consumers will be able to purchase goods online without having to use a credit card, which should appeal to those who don't have credit cards or who are reluctant to use them online. Meanwhile, I4 charges merchants a lower transaction fee for its "bill me later" service than most credit card companies charge, he said.
"The main thing this product does is it takes the friction out of the purchasing process," Lavelle said.
Lavelle declined to name the companies that have been testing the service. Klebe said CyberSource is hoping to sign up two to four large merchants for the "bill me later" service by the end of the year. I4 plans a big marketing push for the service beginning next year, Lavelle said.
Alternatives slow to catch on
Credit cards have been an obstacle for online commerce. Around 20 percent of American adult consumers don't have a credit card, according to Avivah Litan, an online payments analyst with Gartner. Meanwhile, most purchases in the United States are made without a credit card, according to James Van Dyke, an electronic payments analyst with Javelin Strategy and Research. Additionally, many consumers have been reluctant to give out their credit cards online, for fear of having the number compromised or their identity stolen.
A number of start-up companies have tried to fill this gap by introducing alternative payment mechanisms online. Last year, Amazon, for instance, introduced a purchase-order system targeted at big businesses and institutions, such as universities. Meanwhile, 7-Eleven is testing shopping kiosks that allow customers to pay for online purchases with cash. And PayPal has proven to be one of the most popular alternative payment services; its service, which lets buyers pay for transactions out of their bank accounts or PayPal account balances, is used for millions of eBay transactions.
But many other payment models such as Flooz and Beenz have failed. Ninety percent of online purchases are still made using a credit card, according to Van Dyke.
Tricky proposition?
I4's "bill me later" feature could prove costly to the company, Van Dyke said. The company is liable for transactions where a consumer receives goods from a merchant but doesn't pay for them. Additionally, I4 will have to pay the expense of authenticating consumers. That may prove the most difficult part, because some of the target audience for "bill me later" will be consumers who don't carry any credit cards because of bad credit, Van Dyke said.
"There's an opportunity here, Van Dyke said. "Someone's eventually going to get this business. It's just going be tough for whoever does get it to make it work."
Although I4 is allowing customers without credit cards to purchase online, it's approving less than half of the "bill me later" requests from such consumers, Lavelle said. Meanwhile, the company is working closely with merchants and using their customer data to help determine credit risks, he said.
"Most of the merchants we work with don't have huge fraud problems with Visa or MasterCard," he said. But those merchants are upset because they still have to pay high credit card transaction fees, he said.
But privacy issues could be another problem for I4, said Gartner's Litan. Consumers are extremely reluctant to give out personal data online, especially social security numbers, Litan said.
"People are really nervous about it," Litan said. "They have a big uphill battle," even if they are only asking for dates of birth and the last four digits of Social Security numbers, she said.
"That's probably almost as bad if not as bad as giving your credit card out. For some people it's even worse."
56 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
I then started receiving calls from BML to arrange payments. I told them that I had the no pay for 90 day option and they told me that it sounded like it was a problem with Sports Authority and I should contact them. Sports Authority said I should tell BML that they were in the wrong.
After researching the net, I found out that other people have received this same "run-around" treatment from BML.
To top it off, the next time that I was late (keep in mind this is over a $10 payment), they called me on a Sunday morning at 8 a.m. They didn't even offer an apology for waking me, they just said, "Yes Sir, I know what time it is...and we will continue to call until you make a payment." (ON $10 !?!?)
Any time I see the BML logo, I will run the other direction. BML is a SCAM.
Using Bill-Me-Later is just asking for trouble...even though it seems convenient at the time.
Just say NO
Bill Me Later does nothing. Just whatever the merchant says goes.
They told me, the only recourse was to file a suit against the merchant.
I might as well have sent cash!
Beware of Bill Me Later!
I reccomend that no-one use this company and it's service or you will be the next in line contacting your Attorney Generals office and Better Business Bureau filing complaints.
rates of 112.73%..that's right. I have turned their name and their
practice into the states attorney general office for investigation. I
hope something will come of it. They are a BUNCH OF CROOKS !!
Don't ever use this service...
NOT after reading this! I'll stick to my cc.
If you use it with bml you may be giving up certain rights.
2. This comb has been in used forever by police
This has been proven to work, but how much easier
is it to counterfeit (& keep) static information.
3. A cc number & validation code change with every card.
Ever had a recurring billing you couldn't get rid of
without terminating or placing a hold on a card?
So, how do you plan to get rid of recurring pests?
(John 3:3,7 "You must be born again".
-- even that won't help this one!)
4. Combine ssn, dob, & ip (location)... this combination
ties you directly into the government system. Before
there wasn't an effective way for the government to
really tie into you directly (without the banks help),
card info that changes often was unruly...
-- static is easy!
I'm not encouraging anyone to hide. Allowing the exploit
of personal information for gain (your fault [I'm not talking
about the merchant or stores]), i.e., the exchange of your
personal information for convenience will 'bite you in the
end'.
Personally, I wouldn't do it; but I can't tell you what to do! ;)
P.S. Oh, and check out the new "proximity cards".
On the other hand, for items you're sure will be delivered correctly and without damage, the service can be used to your advantage.
Buyer beware.
I am inclined to agree with the others who have posted to this forum. Bill Me Later is a scam. If I do not get a satisfactory answer, I will be notifying the PA Attorney General for assistance.
I also believe that getting woking up at 8 in the morning and being talk to like that is wrong. I dont care who you are or where you work at there is a manner you are to speak to custmers and that is not it. I understand that you have to hear from screaming people all day but that gives you no right to take it out on the next person you have to call or work with. You talk about other people who need to be nice you also have to do the same. All i know is reading this page and the reviews people give it it shows that this BML seem like it is cheating people. You are the only one who gave a long speach about how it is everyone fault. I am sorry but if there is 10 people having the SAME problem with this place that telling you something.
I work with a law firm investigating Bill Me Later for unfair billing practices and they want to hear from California residents who may be interested in participating in a case. You should think about sharing your story at http://www.hbsslaw.com/bill_me_later.htm.
Tina
I have been using their service for 3 years now. I have bought a desktop & 2 laptops. And I have also bought an entertainment center. I have NEVER had a problem with them. Not to say it won't happen. But thus far I have enjoyed using this service. And if you don't want to use credit cards; to me it's the best option there is. So go ahead & cuss me now if you like. I'm a big girl & can handle it. Although I don't like the filth spewed from decs mouth because I am a Christian person. And using the LORD'S name in vain is something that I hate more than anything.
I made a mistake on a 168 dollar purchase and it ends up costing me $61 dollars in fees! ***!
That's like 36% interest!
Our gov't gives banks billions of our money, and the banks show their gratitude by screwing us blind.
Sorry about the economy, but I am done buying things if I don't have the cash in hand.
Might be legal, but I don't have to use their service.
1) $25 on a $300 purchase. Not huge, but, hey, it'll buy dinner.
2) was budgeting a purchase for next month and this would allow me to take advantage of a sale item within my forcasted cash flow plan.
After reading this thread and thinking a little more, there's no WAY I'll use the service. Quite simply it comes down to this. As with any transaction you're counting on the other party to fulfill their end of the deal ($25 off, 90 days to pay, whatever the case may be). Based on the the above it seems at least somewhat likely that BML will not fulfill their end of the deal. Simply not worth the risk just to save a few bucks and enjoy immediate gratification.
Additionally, in thinking about it, BML is basically a credit card company. The big issue for me is that unlike American Express (or pick your own favorite CC) with whom I have a longstanding relationship and who values my business, who answers their 1-800 number, etc. BML's has no relationship with me and likely a strong relationship with the merchant. If it comes down to a charge back situation, who should we expect BML to side with?
So for me, it will be delayed gratification and a hope that some good post Christmas deals will be going on.
I work with a law firm investigating Bill Me Later for unfair billing practices and they want to hear from California residents who may be interested in participating in a case. Share your story at http://www.hbsslaw.com/bill_me_later.htm
Tina
In Feb. of 08 I signed up for a e-card website that was free for the first 30 days, I selected the bill me later option so I didn't have to enter credit card information. I cancelled my subscription to the website shortly after I did what I had to do, and forgot about it. It just so happened I moved out of my parent's house that week.
In July of 08 I got a phone call from a collection's service. I owed upwards of $200 to Bill Me Later according to the collections agent. I had no idea what she was talking about. I contacted Bill Me Later, apparently they went ahead and billed me the $10.95 enrollment fee for the website, even though the first 30 days was supposed to be free, they had been sending bills to my parents house, which I was not receiving otherwise I would have contacted them sooner to let them no there was a mistake. I contacted the website, they told me they would tell Bill Me Later of the mistake. Bill Me Later basically told me yes we heard from them, but you account is deliquent, and you still owe us $200.00 and that's it. They refused to work with me. I contacted the collection's agency, they were very sympathetic of my situation, and told me I could settle with them for $40.00, I was assured that this meant they would legally never be allowed to bill me again. And since I couldn't get anyone else to work with me, and I had been so poorly handled with the company, I figured the $40 was worth it to just get them out of my life. That was in August of 08.
I still regularly receive a bill every month from Bill Me Later, it basically reads, $0 account activity, $19 late charge, $2 finance charge, $21 amount due. And at the very bottom of the bill it reads, this account is currently closed.
Every month I call them, and tell them they've made a mistake and my account needs to be credited. Every month they apologize for the inconveince and explain that it takes 30 days for the system to kick you out, and that my account isn't technically closed, because if it was it would state it on the bill, and I always respond it does. Every time I ask to speak to a supervisor I'm told they don't have one, or they aren't there, or they can't speak to me. The last time I had to call them I asked if they thought consumers were really stupid enough to pay a late fee and finance charge on $0, his response and I quote was "you would actually be surprised" I then told him if I ever received anything else from them I would not only contact my state's attorney general, but their state's attorney general (corporate is based out of Maryland), and then I would file a complaint with the BBB. I received another bill yesterday.
I couldn't pay the bill as the BML letter did not inform me of my new account number except for the last 4 digits, making it impossible to credit my check in total payment of $13.48. I thought I could handle that amount without having to make credit payments. After a phone call to BML and talking in a reasonable tone, The nice BML lady gave me my full account number and the payment mailing address, and at my request, cancelled the account.
I mailed BML a check for $13.48 and I'll just have to wait and see what happens next as BML hasn't had time to cash my check yet. BML may be a scam but so far it has only cost me a few hours of my time.
I will never again buy anything from any seller using only BML as their sole payment method.
Has anyone else been burned by that offer?