February 23, 2007 8:04 AM PST
Microsoft faces Office Live lawsuit
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft hit with $1.5 billion patent verdict
February 22, 2007 -
Microsoft hurt by poor Live branding, analysts say
January 26, 2007 -
Year in review: Microsoft goes 'Live,' pushes Vista
December 21, 2006 -
Windows Live offers a vast array of services
March 14, 2006 -
Gates: We're entering 'live era' of software
November 1, 2005
Office Live, which runs sites such as Legalofficelive.com, Realtorsofficelive.com and Accountantsofficelive.com, offers free professional advice to consumers and offers customer leads to businesses. The company is seeking an injunction to prevent Microsoft from using the "Office Live" name.
The lawsuit comes at a time when Microsoft is working to get its highly touted "Live" offerings established in the market.
In November, Microsoft's Internet-based business software, Office Live, became generally available in the U.S., with such features as customer management tools, e-mail accounts and Web site building and hosting.
Office Live, based in the Los Angeles area, registered the "Office Live" trademark in 2002. It initially filed its lawsuit against Microsoft in December in U.S. District Court in California but agreed to withhold serving the suit to allow the companies to pursue settlement negotiations.
When those talks broke down, Office Live served the software giant with a lawsuit earlier this month.
"It is shocking that Microsoft would have so little regard for another company's intellectual property rights that it would select a name belonging to another company," Lenny Targon, Office Live chief executive, said in a statement. "Online software may be the next big thing, but Microsoft has no right to use our trademark without permission."
"We don't think Office Live LLC has a trademark, or that we are infringing any rights asserted by Office Live LLC," a Microsoft representative said. "Now that the complaint has been served, we will vigorously defend our legal position. We also will seek to invalidate Office Live LLC's claim to trademark the phrase "Office Live" in its common connotation."
Microsoft said it views the word "Live" as a descriptor, such as in the case of "AOL Live" and "Vodafone Live," and has indicated that stance to Office Live LLC in previous discussions.
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Office Live, lawsuit, Microsoft Office, on-demand, Microsoft Corp.
20 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
another company's intellectual property rights"
Where has this guy been living for the last 20 some years? Since
when has MS cared about other companies rights? You don't
become as dominant as MS has without trampling all over other
peoples rights. Of course we all know why he is stating it like
this. The company lawyers smell big money in this one.
Not that I like MS, but we should really do something about the
proliferation of lawyers in this country.
a small company's trademark. Trademarks and Patents are
supposed to be designed to protect small companies from
exactly that.
Large companies cannot be allowed to just bully their way
around. If M$ want to use the name, then they should buy it.
Especially for small companies, why they didn't approach the
guy and buy it before ever announcing their product just goes to
show their level of arrogance. M$ thinks it can do whatever it
wants.
Microsoft... then it will be even. Mmmmm I
doubt Mr. Gates would allow that... maybe I
should start my water softener company called
Microsoft Water Systems, hey we are not in the
same business.
www.pornwindows.com - Porn images framed inside a variety of window frames.
www.windowvistas.com - Pictures of scenic "vistas" viewed through "windows."
www.deadwindowvistas.com - Pictures of strip mines, chernobyl, etc. "vistas," viewed through "windows."
www.balmywindowvista.com - Pictures of the back of a fat bald head in the foreground of a tropical "vista" viewed through various "windows." (double entendre)
etc. etc. etc.
I think Microsoft is simply wrong. I think that, deep down, so does Microsoft. After all, they do own the trademarks to "Xbox Live", "Windows Live", and even the word "Live"!
Paul
If you're going to throw stones at someone else, make sure you know you're standing on the moral high ground first.
Microsoft entered into an agreement with Novell and agreed not to sue each other (but EVERYBODY ELSE) for discrepancies in Open Source licensing. This is their foot in the door to be a menace to anything "Free to use under Prior Art definition."
The expression "It's not enough for me to win, everybody else must lose" IS the Business Model for Microsoft's success.
Congress could be directly involved in correcting Patent Law, but they just continue to be political Limpdicks.