- Related Stories
-
Bush picks tech lawyer for security post
July 13, 2005 -
The leader of the robot pack
July 7, 2005 -
Liquid-filled chips cool like mini-fridges
April 18, 2005
"Less lethal" weapon shoots a microwave beam, causes painful hot spots. Scientists worry targets could suffer permanent damage.
Photos: Researchers cook up microwave weapon
The story "Riot control ray gun worries scientists" published July 20, 2005 at 12:22 PM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.






Can you imagine the effect of pumping the power up on this thing? Death ray or a heat ray like in War of the Worlds.
http://jmaximus.blogspot.com
Can you imagine the effect of pumping the power up on this thing? Death ray or a heat ray like in War of the Worlds.
http://jmaximus.blogspot.com
Imagine it in the hands of some sadistic military members such as have been shown up in recent news stories from Iraq and from prisoner camps! What sport they could have, how it would fuel their cruel urges.
I can't write any more, I am so dismayed that mankind is continuing to create ever more montrous weapons and has learned nothing from history.
http://jmaximus.blogspot.com
Imagine it in the hands of some sadistic military members such as have been shown up in recent news stories from Iraq and from prisoner camps! What sport they could have, how it would fuel their cruel urges.
I can't write any more, I am so dismayed that mankind is continuing to create ever more montrous weapons and has learned nothing from history.
http://jmaximus.blogspot.com
You'd better hope microwave RF doesn't cause "permanent damage to DNA" since cellphones, wireless networks and cordless phones use it. Further, this radiation is at 95 GHz., so it is in between microwave and IR radiation (millimeter waves, technically).
This means that it doesn't "heat all water in the body", since it only penetrates into the skin. (Also the only DNA that could possibly be damaged is in the skin, and I'm pretty certain it would only be damaged by sufficient heating, just as if you'd been burned by a conventional heat source.)
"If this is used then there will be a lot of sickness six months later. Stuff like cancer, sterillity and blindness."
I seriously doubt it.
"When I worked on RADARs and was forced to do tests with the cabinets open I did my best to keep it short. My radar was 3GHz and you could feel the RF soaking into you, and that was just klystron (big glass valve) leakage. Scarey and sick."
So you worked with a 30 times longer wavelength...not very relevant. If the leakage was so bad (and worried you so much) why didn't you wear protective gear?
You'd better hope microwave RF doesn't cause "permanent damage to DNA" since cellphones, wireless networks and cordless phones use it. Further, this radiation is at 95 GHz., so it is in between microwave and IR radiation (millimeter waves, technically).
This means that it doesn't "heat all water in the body", since it only penetrates into the skin. (Also the only DNA that could possibly be damaged is in the skin, and I'm pretty certain it would only be damaged by sufficient heating, just as if you'd been burned by a conventional heat source.)
"If this is used then there will be a lot of sickness six months later. Stuff like cancer, sterillity and blindness."
I seriously doubt it.
"When I worked on RADARs and was forced to do tests with the cabinets open I did my best to keep it short. My radar was 3GHz and you could feel the RF soaking into you, and that was just klystron (big glass valve) leakage. Scarey and sick."
So you worked with a 30 times longer wavelength...not very relevant. If the leakage was so bad (and worried you so much) why didn't you wear protective gear?
They must not use this detterant/weapon or any other one, especially so indiscriminantly and without complete understanding and knowledge of its destructive capabilities.
They must not use this detterant/weapon or any other one, especially so indiscriminantly and without complete understanding and knowledge of its destructive capabilities.
"How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross
Sucks to be them. Perhaps after the first ?hit? by this weapon, they will think twice about going back for another riot.
"How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?"
We could always just use 50 Caliber Machine Guns. There is no doubt that will cause permanent damage!
Does everyone FORGET that these people are trying to harm others? Tough CRAP!
It is a good thing they didn't have this in LA when my wife was trying to leave the area that the riot was in.
So I guess you live/work in places that couldn't possibly have a riot? A farm maybe?
"How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross
Sucks to be them. Perhaps after the first ?hit? by this weapon, they will think twice about going back for another riot.
"How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?"
We could always just use 50 Caliber Machine Guns. There is no doubt that will cause permanent damage!
Does everyone FORGET that these people are trying to harm others? Tough CRAP!
It is a good thing they didn't have this in LA when my wife was trying to leave the area that the riot was in.
So I guess you live/work in places that couldn't possibly have a riot? A farm maybe?
Please everyone, write to your congressmen and senators and ask them to stop this device!
As a 'defender' during the riots, you are usually outnumbered by MANY, MANY people. We have no idea who is going to pull out guns, or rocks, or bottles, or flaming bottles of gasoline (don't tell me that has never happened during a riot either). People have the right to assemble, and even protest. They do NOT have the right to riot. If they do decide to riot, then the people defending the city property, or building, or whatever, have the right to protect that property. Mace and water cannons have good effect, but if this device started to show up--let me tell you, after the first riot--people would start to think differently about thier "right' to violence.
Please everyone, write to your congressmen and senators and ask them to stop this device!
As a 'defender' during the riots, you are usually outnumbered by MANY, MANY people. We have no idea who is going to pull out guns, or rocks, or bottles, or flaming bottles of gasoline (don't tell me that has never happened during a riot either). People have the right to assemble, and even protest. They do NOT have the right to riot. If they do decide to riot, then the people defending the city property, or building, or whatever, have the right to protect that property. Mace and water cannons have good effect, but if this device started to show up--let me tell you, after the first riot--people would start to think differently about thier "right' to violence.
What's wrong with water-cannons?
zomgomzgomzogmzgom stop the insanity! let's just let people riot! that's the sane way!!!
some people need to stop sensationalizing things. too many morons talking about people getting 'roasted alive'. read a book or something.
- Disturbing and Unnecessary
- by July 21, 2005 2:03 PM PDT
- Another example of US hypocrisy. Going on about freedom and then they draw up the plans to this horror. Designed to punish and strike fear into anyone that wishes to demonstrate or protest.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- zzzzzomg wtf holyholyholy oh noes!
- by Sam Papelbon July 27, 2005 6:37 AM PDT
- people will be DROWNED ALIVE if we use water cannons!! and if we use pepper spray, people will be SUFFOCAATED ALIVE and if we use rubber bullets people will be POKED TO DEATH ALIVE!!!!!!
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (120 Comments)What's wrong with water-cannons?
zomgomzgomzogmzgom stop the insanity! let's just let people riot! that's the sane way!!!
some people need to stop sensationalizing things. too many morons talking about people getting 'roasted alive'. read a book or something.