June 25, 2007 4:00 AM PDT

Linux coders tackle power efficiency

Maybe you'd be better off if you didn't spend so much time looking at your watch.

That, loosely speaking, is the rationale behind a significant change at the heart of Linux that programmers hope will make the open-source operating system more efficient. New versions of the operating system are being endowed with a "tickless" kernel that forsakes traditional computer time-keeping in an effort to keep the processor in a somnolent, low-power state.

Power efficiency is something every operating system could use. For Linux, efficiency could make the operating system more competitive with Windows on portable computers by extending battery life, and on servers that typically run 24 hours a day, it could cut growing power costs.

The tickless kernel isn't the only effort under way. Intel released software called PowerTop in May that makes it easier to find out what software is needlessly keeping a computer's processor on high alert.

"It makes a lot of sense," Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff said of the power-saving work. "Raw, flat-out horsepower is less and less what the game's about--especially on laptops, which are becoming more common."

Some Linux developments take years to arrive, but the tickless kernel is now making its way into the Linux mainstream.

"The re-engineering has mostly been done," said Linux leader Linus Torvalds of the new kernel. And for higher-level software, PowerTop has been "invaluable," he added. "A lot of people and (Linux) distributions are actually interested in this, so the user applications do seem to be getting fixed."

There's more work to be done, but the progress has been measurable, said Arjan van de Ven, a longtime kernel programmer now working at Intel. "What we see in our lab today is that Linux on a laptop consumes 15 percent to 25 percent less power during idle than a code base of about three months ago," he said.

Cutting chip power
Processors, though not the only power drain in a computer, slurp a lot of electrical power--more than a 100-watt lightbulb in many cases. Worse, even more electricity is consumed by fans that blow waste heat out of a computer, and more still by air conditioning in data centers.

But in recent years, chipmakers have given microprocessors the ability to drop down into lower-power states when they don't need to run full throttle. The chip's internal frequency slows, voltage levels drop, and electrical consumption tapers down.

"Raw, flat-out horsepower is less and less what the game's about--especially on laptops, which are becoming more common."
--Gordon Haff, analyst, Illuminata

Obviously, processors can go into these power-saving states when a user commands a computer into standby mode. But a lot more can be done. Because gigahertz-frequency processor cycles last less than a billionth of a second, though, chips can actually enter and leave low-power states many times in the interval between two keystrokes of a fast typist.

But an operating system kernel--the core software that handles basic tasks such as scheduling processes and communicating with hardware--isn't always good at avoiding busywork. For one thing, software often needlessly prods the kernel into alertness. For another, the kernel itself can waste energy twiddling its thumbs when it could just as well be lowering its blood pressure and dozing off.

Intel's software helps uncover examples of the first problem. The tickless kernel helps with the second.

Going tickless
Version 2.6.21 of the Linux kernel, which Torvalds released in April, includes the tickless option. It was incorporated into Fedora 7, Red Hat's free hobbyist version of Linux.

"In terms of power, it's a huge savings," van de Ven said.

A typical Intel processor for mobile computers consumes a maximum of 1.2 watts in its deepest power-saving state, he said. "The gotcha is that if you wake up every millisecond, you hardly get past the shallow power saving mode," van de Ven said. "The end effect is that tickless gets you into the maximum power save modes, saving significant power and extending battery life."

The tickless kernel still keeps track of time, but in a different way. Instead of checking frequently for work to be done--literally 1,000 times a second in the case of Linux, with each millisecond-long tick of the kernel's clock--the kernel schedules the hardware to interrupt it when it knows a future job will require its attention.

The tickless kernel provides another indirect benefit when it comes to power efficiency: It enables better use of virtualization, technology that lets multiple operating systems run simultaneously on the same computer, by replacing numerous idle machines with fewer, more efficiently used ones.

Tickless kernels mean that the virtualization software that underlies all those operating systems isn't unduly taxed with needless interruptions. So theoretically, administrators can consolidate servers more aggressively.

CONTINUED: Enter PowerTop…
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
kernel, Illuminata Inc., Linux, efficiency, state

4 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Linux was already well ahead of MS
Like everything else.

Without these changes, my SuSE install on my laptop lasts about 95% longer on batteries then the default XP install.
Posted by qwerty75 (1164 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Indeed.
Miguel de Icaza and his team of Mono developers just finished a first implementation of Silverlight for Linux (Moonlight) in 21 days:

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/07/06/25/1427225.shtml" target="_newWindow">http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/07/06/25/1427225.shtml</a>

Microsoft takes what...a few months to do something that has security holes in it like swiss cheese?

Open Source philosophy will always be ahead of Microsoft due to the open-eyes approach to rapid application development. Applications pop-up, security holes are spotted and patched almost as fast, and nothing can really match it.

The juxtaposition of these two opposing methods simply makes Microsoft look like a second-rate development house of cheap, out-sourced labor. The irony is that OSS is made up of a world of labor that has a fondness for coding, to see things done right and in an open arena.
Posted by `WarpKat (275 comments )
Link Flag
95%?
SuSE is definately better than XP but I dont know about 95% better unless you have XP set to stay in performance mode.

I did a heavy ammount of tweaking both XP and SuSE when I first got my laptop in early 2004 when the mobile Athlon 64s came out. I'd enabled all kinds of power saving tweaks in XP and the AMD power now features to clock down the CPU while in battery as well as cut graphics performance automatically in bat mode and was able to extend battery life in XP by almost an hr.

Under SuSE though, I redid a tempfs to map to RAM instead of disk so browser cache and various other stuff that writes there would not go to disk, I added in some features to spin down and turn off disks in 5 mins and power down sections of the MB not being used, power down broad cast power on my WiFi if I had a good signal, and clock down the CPU while on battery. I somehow had to turn off that annoying tick message that syslogd writes to logs that kept spinning up the HD also. After all that tweaking and 3 months of work in spare time when I was bored I got about an hr and 30-40 mins extra out of battery from default settings. So about an extra 40-50 mins over XP with all its battery saving features turned on.

Still a huge difference but not 95%

This tickless kernel, however, sounds really cool I'd love to try it out and see what it can do.
Posted by lynxss (39 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.