- Related Stories
-
Can't stop the pop-ups
June 4, 2004 -
Microsoft pushes back XP update
April 28, 2004
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security![]()
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One flaw lets an attacker run a program on a victim's machine, while the other enables malicious code to "cross zones," or run with privileges higher than normal. Together, the two issues allow for the creation of a Web site that, when visited by victims, can upload and install programs to the victim's computer, according to two analyses of the security holes.
The possibility that a group or company has apparently used the vulnerabilities as a way to sneak unwanted advertising software, or adware, onto a user's computer could be grounds for criminal charges, said Stephen Toulouse, security program manager for Microsoft.
"We consider that any use of an exploit to run a program is a criminal use," he said. "We are going to work aggressively with law enforcement to prosecute individuals or companies that do so."
Microsoft learned of the issue when a security researcher posted an analysis of the problem to the Full Disclosure security mailing list Monday. The software giant has already contacted the FBI and is in the "early stages" of building the case, Toulouse said. The company is considering creating a patch quickly and releasing it as soon as possible, rather than waiting for its usual monthly update.
The flaws are apparently being used to install the I-Lookup search bar, an adware toolbar that is added to IE's other toolbars. The adware changes the Internet Explorer home page, connects to one of six advertising sites and frequently displays pop-ups--mainly pornographic ads, according to an adware advisory on antivirus company Symantec's Web site.
On Tuesday, security information group Secunia released an advisory about the problem, rating the two flaws "extremely critical."
"Secunia has confirmed the vulnerabilities in a fully patched system with Internet Explorer 6.0," the group wrote. "It has been reported that the preliminary SP2 (a major security update being developed by Microsoft) prevents exploitation by denying access."
The flaws could let any attacker with a Web site send an e-mail message or an instant message with a link that, when clicked on by an Internet Explorer user, would cause a program to run on that victim's computer.The original analysis, written by a Netherland student researcher, Jelmer Kuperus, who found that the type of programming needed to take advantage of at least one of the flaws required sophisticated knowledge of the Windows operating system.
"While sophisticated, it's so easy to use, anyone with basic computer science can set up such a page, now that the code is out there in the open," Kuperus wrote in an e-mail interview with CNET News.com. "It's just a matter of changing two or three (Internet addresses) and uploading another" executable file.
Kuperus, who used an e-mail account based in the Netherlands, wrote in a Monday e-mail that he had been tipped off to the adware Trojan horse by an unnamed individual.
"Being rather skeptical, I carelessly clicked on the link only to witness how it automatically installed adware on my PC!" he wrote.
The Internet address from which the adware Trojan horse was downloaded resolves to I-Lookup.com, a search engine registered in Costa Rica that antivirus firms Symantec and PestPatrol have linked to aggressive advertising software. Two of the top three searches on the site relate to removing such programs, according to I-Lookup.com's own statistics.
A domain name search shows i-Lookup.com's parent company to be Aztec Marketing, but Pest Patrol links the site with iClicks Internet. E-mails sent to both companies for comment were not immediately answered.
Kuperus believes that i-Lookup.com's parent company may not be directly responsible for the adware-installing Trojan horse program, but that it could be rewarding the creator through an affiliate program.
"It does pass along a referrer code when downloading," he said. "Whomever created this probably is getting money for every install, so if the folks at (i-Lookup.com) would be willing, they would be able to track down the perpetrators."
Microsoft's Toulouse said Internet Explorer users could harden the software against such attacks by following instructions on the company's site. Other browsers available on Windows, such as Opera and Mozilla, do not contain the flaws.




2) Sites that require ActiveX (usually games-on-demand sites.)
I've disabled access to IE for anything web-related, and the only pages I go to with it are Windows Update and Comcast Games On Demand. If Mozilla Firefox could incorporate ActiveX, I'd mothball IE altogether. I'd love to be able to fully disable IE, but as long as there's enough M$ money to line the pockets of the politicos and pay off the USDoC and EU fines without so much as a wrinkle in Mr. Gate$' checkbook, then we're pretty much up the sewer without a gas mask.
That's just my 2 cents... which is approximately what's left out of my paycheck once I buy an overpriced MickeyShaft product.
Honestly at this point anyone that uses Imploder is an idiot.
c
execute all criminals and all crime would decrease, but new crimals will reimerge.
but criminals are not the root of the problem, nor are the creators of malicious code.
your first questions is to ask why they wrote the code in the first place and take action to address that issue.
As an applications developer, if the system is compromised due to a flaw in my design, I am held accountable and take responsibility for the flaw.
As a designer of some of the most widely used applciations in the world, the company that developed them should be held accountable, in addition to the perpetrator, for neglegance in the design of their application and take responsibility for their mistakes.
Fixing an issue that can arise in real damages only after the fact is not enough.
I do belive that MS should be more resposible in how they ship their products, but it has been six months now; What about the firewall vendors and virus detection companies? Isn't that what we pay them for.
How about this article? Should it take six month's to report these, need-to-know issues?
One more thought - Why would and advertising agency or virus developer be interested in going after browsers only a small fraction of the users install.
Complete agreemnt: All of these companies that provide these products and services should be more open with the information that they have and take responsibility for their design flaws.
They only release the information if they can insure liability can be placed elsewhere. It's like your afraid to tell anyone there's a fire because you're not sure your the one that started it.
Too bad there isn't a law that protects the end users from faulty software.
- So typical
-
by
June 25, 2004 12:33 PM PDT
- I like Microsoft Windows but it seems they cannot get it right. What?s up with the continuous onslaught of security problems? Every time I turn on the computer there is another up date or warning about yet another security issue or another possible attack, and the news only comes after the facts. Dose anybody at Microsoft ever consider these things when they write this stuff? Or is it job time security and not computer security that?s the issue? Will someone please tell Bill Gates that after all these years of development (at the public?s expense) and the unknown amount of Moines paid for a crash out of the box system that is guaranteed to cost you all your data (TIME) that we deserve something that works! I bet Bill uses Linux at home
-
Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)