Perspective: Why Larry Lessig gets an "F" in software

Lawrence Lessig first came to public attention a few years ago when U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, then presiding over the Microsoft antitrust case, invited him down from Harvard as a special master.

Since then, Lessig--nowadays working at Stanford University--made a name writing and expounding on the danger posed by powerful, entrenched interests in using copyright law to choke innovation and halt the sharing and distribution of copyrighted works online.

This was all of a piece with the spirit of Creative Commons, a nonprofit organization Lessig helped create with the laudable idea of creating a "property conservancy" that, among other things, would "protect works of special public value from exclusionary private ownership." Some of the works would presumably be donated, others would be bought from the creators. Nothing untoward there.

But Lessig is also going further. In his latest book, "The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World," he draws a distinction between the intellectual property developed by, say, an Ernest Hemingway, and the intellectual property created by a code jockey.

"When the system protects Hemingway, we at least get to see how Hemingway writes. We get to learn about his style and the tricks he uses to make his work succeed. We can see this because it is the nature of creative writing that the writing is public. There is no such thing as language that conveys meaning while not simultaneously transmitting its words.

"Software is different," he continues. "Software gets compiled, and the compiled code is essentially unreadable; but in order to copyright software, the author need not reveal the source code."

Lessig would limit software copyrights to ten years. After that, the code would wind up in the public domain.

That results in an unfair social arrangement, according to Lessig, who believes that coders (or more likely, the companies they work for) get to enjoy decades of copyright protection (70-plus years) while the public gets nary little in return.

And then punctuating his prose with a professorial flourish, Lessig dismisses this as "a bastardization of the Constitution's requirement that copyright be for 'limited times.'"

Software wasn't around when Madison, Hamilton and Jay were arguing in support of a constitution in the Federalist Papers, and it's hard to know what the founding fathers would have made of all this (though my bet is they would have been Mac guys, not PC guys).

I'll leave Lessig to fight that argument out with Alan Dershowitz. But considering the billions of dollars and thousands of jobs created through software development over the last couple of decades, it's hard to argue there has not been considerable community benefit to letting software developers retain copyright control over their code. Open source has its place, but it's not the answer for everything.

How long should society give the creators of code to enjoy the fruits of their labor before lifting copyright controls?

Lessig would limit software copyrights to 10 years. After that, the code would wind up in the public domain. I can't think of a better prescription for formalizing the existing constellation of power that favors the Microsofts and Oracles over the small and independent developers.

At this juncture in the history of the software industry, more so than ever before, 10 years doesn't amount to a hill of JavaBeans--not when you're attempting to build up brand, distribution and customer loyalty in an increasingly fragmented and competitive market.

Lessig would doubtless oppose anything cementing that structural imbalance. But good intentions are not good enough and the reality of the software industry in 2002 is such that stripping away carefully developed intellectual property in pursuit of a wooly-headed Arcadian utopia will only boost the fortunes of the software superpowers already living the life of Riley.

How long should society give the creators of code to enjoy the fruits of their labor before lifting copyright controls? If we want to maintain the flow of software innovation, it better be for a fair chunk of time. Otherwise, you're going to wind up with something like Albania, circa 1975.

Got the picture?

Biography
Charles Cooper is CNET News.com's executive editor of commentary.

More Perspectives

[Unicity]

[ 'Longhorm Matters?' ] Bravo .....

In Re: &lt;<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593_22-5681243.html?" target="_newWindow">http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593_22-5681243.html?</a>
tag=zdnn.alert&gt;

Charles;

After well over thirty-years of WIntel experience, from CPM thru
XP Pro and beyond,
I switched after hearing Steve Jobs ( QuickTime ) introduce OS X.
I was desperate.
I never signed on to be an expert on re-formating my drives and
reloading operating
systems.

First I ran out and bought a used turquoise &#38; white 'smurph', a
three-hundred dollar
PowerPC G3 and converted it to run OS X ( More Sophisticated
Drive &#38; a GB of RAM ).

Immediately, I ran out and bought a new Chromed Bay Door
Power PC G4, also with
a GB of DDR SDRAM. At the soonest possible moment, I pre-
ordered, I got an original
Dual 2 Ghz PowerPC G5 .....

[ Until yesterday I still used my, at the time, 'bleeding-edge'
Gateway 650XL Multi-
Media Desktop-Replacement running XP Professional, in
emergencies ] Long Story ].

I have a few friends, who after switching from Apples to WIntel
some years back ( I'm
not really certain why- It has something to do with Job's leaving
and the BEOS / NEXT
fiasco, refused to switch back- Despite the mature 64-bit OS &#38;
Applications .....

They were building 64-bit ( AMD ) boxes and praying for
Longhorn. Go Figure .....

Now they seem to be converting to various flavors of Linux /
Unix ( Dual-Boot )?

Maybe you can understand this phenomenon?


Eric Cabot Steed
Singul.us


"... technology, talent, tolerance."

* © 2005, www.Singul.us, All rights reserved** [ Singulus is a
Not-for-Profit, Religious &#38; Educational Organization
Representing Hindi, Buddhist, Taoist, Judaic, Christian, Muslim,
and Indigenous or Natural Mystic, Wisdom Orders, equally and
without bias, prejudice, or discrimination based on Race, Color,
Creed, Nation of Origin, Social or Economic Strata, Physical
Condition, Gender or Age.] - Alexander P. Hixon, Jr., Founder
Emeritus - Consecrated to the Confraternity of the Message of
Hazrat Inayat Khan. &lt; <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://singulus.typepad.com/" target="_newWindow">http://singulus.typepad.com/</a>
generation_z &gt;

[f5gj2]

Wow, Lessig has a great idea here. Too bad it will never happen because it's far too threatening to the Microsofts and Orcales who create US copyright law.