Version: 2008
  • On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
Commentary: Digital denial
By Forrester Research
Special to CNET News.com
January 13, 2003, 8:55AM PT

By George F. Colony, Chairman and CEO

Digital media will transform the music and film industries--whether they like it or not.

The entertainment industry is full of so-called "rebels" who pray for the status quo. The industry uses lobbyists, lawyers, PR and politicians to fight for the perpetuation of its safe and very profitable business models.

And entertainment business models have worked phenomenally for the past 75 years. Edwin Booth, the superstar stage actor of the mid-19th century, had fame and a modicum of wealth. But he was compensated, inflation adjusted, in his lifetime, at less than what Mel Gibson brings in per movie. John Phillip Sousa was renowned for musical compositions and performances at the turn of the century, but his career take was less than what Eminem made in 2002.

What created this flood of money for today's artists and the companies that sponsor them? In a word, technology. Radio, records, film, tape, home audio, television, VCRs, CDs, and DVDs opened up avenues for syndicating music and film and drove high compensation. The U.S. Constitution doesn't guarantee Harrison Ford $25 million per movie. Technology got him to that figure.

Technology can create extraordinary business equations as it did with entertainment. And technology can rewrite the formula. There are three inexorable factors that are changing the equation for entertainment.

First, in the future there will be no medium--no piece of plastic, no spool of tape--that will contain film or music content. The DVD is the last digital medium for film. Beyond it lies no medium. Music or film will be just another pile of bits sitting undifferentiated alongside bank account statements, credit card information, voice mail, e-mail and other data that will freely slosh around in a consumer?s life. There will be no "there" there.

Second, consumers want liquidity in their entertainment product. Much of the MP3 ripping and burning that infuriates the Recording Industry Association of America is devoted to achieving mobility--getting tracks onto CD compilations or into computers that travel with listeners. The great-grandson of Wi-Fi will link your car, home and work locations. When you park your car at your house, the digital music system in the car will replicate with your house system--so that all music in those two locations is synced. When you drive to work, your work systems will be synced. Bits will migrate with you as you move through life.


Related story
Licensing labyrinth
The studio battle over protecting copyrights
is worthy of a Hollywood script.

Third, pricing will change. What was the last vinyl album you bought? (Mine was Michael Jackson's "Thriller.") How much did you pay for it? (I paid $7.25.) What was the first CD you bought? (Mine was Sting's "Dream of the Blue Turtles.") What did you pay for that CD? (I paid $20.) Even though it was cheaper to manufacture CDs than vinyl and even though the cost to make music was dropping due to digital production systems, consumers paid more. Rip-off. And consumers know it.

• What it means No. 1: The entertainment world?s compensation will fall back to earth. Aerosmith makes $5 million a year from its recorded library. Would the band still be in the business if it only made $1 million? The world of entertainment production is riddled with $3 million-per-year screenwriters who never get their movies made, key grips getting paid $175,000, and assistant assistant production managers making seven figures. It?s a world that has become recklessly overpaid and vastly inefficient because the business model lets it. There will still be a lot of money around even after the rules change. The Grateful Dead welcomed taping at their shows. Jerry Garcia died rich.

• What it means No. 2: The liquidity of entertainment will explode. I was recently talking with Hitachi executives in Japan about how disk drives are about to start popping up in lots of consumer products--refrigerators, projectors, television sets, CD players, boom boxes and cars. The first wave of this trend is, of course, personal video recorders like TiVo's. The next front is radio, with the ability to easily record digital music. Satellite radio and digital television will prove to be a much bigger problem for the entertainment industry than Napster ever was.

• What it means No. 3: New entertainment moguls will get minted in the next five to 10 years. The new David Sarnoffs and Sam Goldwyns will embrace the new reality and codify workable business models. I thought that Steve Case or Thomas Middelhoff might have had a shot. But the interests of AOL Time Warner and Bertelsmann won't stand for revolution. They?ve got too much to lose when the rules change.

Lawyers and lobbyists can't stop these trends. End the denial. Get over it, get on with it, figure it out. Or end up in the dustbin of history with sheet music publishers.

© 2003, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change.

Download free PDF versions of News.com's award-winning Special Reports. The latest research in a handy format. Registration required.

Breaking the digital gridlock
July 26, 2004

South Korea's digital dynasty
June 23, 2004

Bigger blue
June 14, 2004

Reality behind the politics
May 4, 2004

Playing for keeps
December 9, 2003

Corporate classrooms
November 11, 2003

Vision Series 4 (Part 1)
June 2, 2003

Digital remix
May 28, 2003

Mother of invention
April 11, 2003

It's a buyer's market
February 11, 2003

Nothing but air
February 3, 2003

Vision Series 3
December 2, 2002

A Mortal Microsoft
October 14, 2002

E-Terrorism
August 26, 2002

China's new dynasty
July 9, 2002

Vision Series: Tech chiefs dictate the future
June 10, 2002

Vision Series: Survey results
June 10, 2002

Sun's Java jigsaw
March 28, 2002

The Gatekeeper: Windows XP
October 17, 2001

A bitter pill
September 26, 2001

Privacy vs. safety
September 17, 2001

Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Well that was an ill thought out crock
by June 5, 2005 9:47 PM PDT
Disappearance of the physical medium? I don't
think so.

You do know that Kodak has CD's and DVD's that
only have lasted 3 years, right?

You need to study acrylics and how they flow
over time like a liquid. They are not going to
stand the test of time, like vynil and tape do.
Nor will they last as long as acetate. But
mostly, Digital cannot be analoque, that is, it
is a poor reproduction no matter how good your
untrained eyes and ears think it is.

Film has trillions of atoms. A computer will
never get that resolution.

I really think you're dreaming, about Utopia,
Eldorado, or some other fictional City of Gold.

What you should be talking about is the fact
that the Authors are now defining Internet
Rights, and Hollywood is not getting any of
them.

After 100 years, we finally have Hollywood where
we want it, in a begging position.

No music for Hollywood without full unnegotiable
Internet Synchronization Rights, that is,
payment per copy sold, or distributed in any
manner, especially the Internet.

No more music releases for a lousey few hundred
or a few thousand dollars; we want payment for
the life of the copyright, our life plus 70
years.

And every Author had better wake up now!

Shylock in Beverly Hills will defer to the Duke
of Milan once again.
Reply to this comment
Well that was an ill thought out crock
by June 5, 2005 9:47 PM PDT
Disappearance of the physical medium? I don't
think so.

You do know that Kodak has CD's and DVD's that
only have lasted 3 years, right?

You need to study acrylics and how they flow
over time like a liquid. They are not going to
stand the test of time, like vynil and tape do.
Nor will they last as long as acetate. But
mostly, Digital cannot be analoque, that is, it
is a poor reproduction no matter how good your
untrained eyes and ears think it is.

Film has trillions of atoms. A computer will
never get that resolution.

I really think you're dreaming, about Utopia,
Eldorado, or some other fictional City of Gold.

What you should be talking about is the fact
that the Authors are now defining Internet
Rights, and Hollywood is not getting any of
them.

After 100 years, we finally have Hollywood where
we want it, in a begging position.

No music for Hollywood without full unnegotiable
Internet Synchronization Rights, that is,
payment per copy sold, or distributed in any
manner, especially the Internet.

No more music releases for a lousey few hundred
or a few thousand dollars; we want payment for
the life of the copyright, our life plus 70
years.

And every Author had better wake up now!

Shylock in Beverly Hills will defer to the Duke
of Milan once again.
Reply to this comment
advertisement