ie8 fix

Digital kids

When digital kids rule the classroom

By Stefanie Olsen
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: April 26, 2006 4:00 AM PST

Teachers may be the masters in the classroom, but when it comes to mastering technology, a growing number of schools are turning to students.

Take Megan Kennedy, an eighth-grader in Hill City, Kan. She's one of 40 students participating in a program called GenYes in which kids teach teachers how to use technology. For her project, Megan and two classmates worked with a local kindergarten teacher to integrate an Apple iMovie into a lesson about clocks. They made a 3-minute movie showing the 5-year-olds at various times in their day, with the The Jackson Five song "ABC" as background music.

The film was an instant hit with both teacher and tykes.

"They thought it was so cool, they were all laughing and dancing to the music," Megan, 13, said in a telephone interview. As for the teacher, Megan said, "We showed her how to upload the video from the camera, cut clips and add titles to the bottom of the slides. Next year, we're going to do a Web page for her and link it to our movie."

The initiative is one of a number of similar projects bubbling up in school systems in California, Texas, Arizona, New York and other parts of the country. These projects are an acknowledgement that kids often know more about technology than their teachers do.

So why not let tech-savvy kids turn the tables and teach the teachers? Everyone wins, believe educators like Scott Parker, a teacher at Megan's school. Students learn career skills like collaboration and meeting deadlines, and teachers get on-the-job training in technology for the classroom, he said.

There are larger issues at play than just making sure the adults can talk tech with the kids, of course. Advocates say school-tech projects are more important than ever because U.S. children are lagging behind their international counterparts in math, science and tech proficiency.

"Tech is the 21st century. We're putting kids behind the eight ball if they don't have any contact with computers," said Jamal Hicks, a teacher of social studies and technology at Jonas Salk Middle School in Sacramento, Calif.

"We're putting kids behind the eight ball if they don't have any contact with computers."
-- Jamal Hicks, teacher

Proponents also say such programs are more important than ever to counterbalance the fear felt by parents and teachers who want to keep kids away from sites like MySpace.com.

"Schools tend to react to emerging technology like MySpace by restricting student use with a heavy hand...(But) to improve education, we must put real digital-age tools in student hands," said Dennis Harper, founder of GenYes.

Hicks said that 98 percent of students at Jonas Salk don't have access to computers at home. This year, seventh-graders were able for the first time to participate in a program called Technology Literacy Project, or TechYes, which was funded by a grant from Verizon.

The program, which Hicks oversees for Jonas Salk, rewards students for proficiency with computers and issues credit for teaching other students skills with various technology. For example, 10 students in Hicks' Avid software class have been teaching Spanish-speaking students in an English Language Literacy class how to use a computer for the first time. Next up, the TechYes students will work with science students on projects in Avid.

"They're just eating it alive," said Hicks, who added that he often lets the kids run class because they're are so proactive with the technology.

History of GenYes

TechYes and GenYes, which stands for Generation of Youth and Educators Succeeding, was Harper's brainchild more than 10 years ago. At the time, Harper was a technology director for the Olympia, Wash., school district and he realized that technology wouldn't be integrated in the curriculum until kids, natural champions of technology, were involved. So Harper wrote a government grant proposal for a technology program that could be expanded if successful in one school. The grant was approved in 1996 to carry through to 2001, but Harper has continued the program through his own business GenYes, which licenses the curriculum to schools.

That program, which is still going strong in Olympia, includes lesson plans for students to use technology in every K-12 classroom. GenYes has spread to hundreds of schools throughout the country in recent years, including a high school in Phoenix that will pilot the program next year.

Greg Partch, director of educational technology at the Hudson Falls School District, said his district was the first in New York state to implement GenYes in 1998. Since that time, more than 150 districts have adopted the program, "directly from our input and success," he said.

"It's changed the culture of our schools," Partch said. As an example, he said, two high school students are now offering a professional development workshop for adults to learn how to use Windows Movie Maker.

Inspired by his work with GenYes, Partch is spinning off his own nonprofit called Smart Ed, for students mentoring adults. Through the program, Partch plans to partner with the State University of New York at Albany to create a three-credit online course for high-school juniors and seniors, in which they would learn how to teach teachers about cybersecurity, among other course curriculum. In turn, the teachers could instruct students on how to be safe online.

Harper's for-profit company, GenYes, has also sprouted other initiatives such as Generation Tech, which teaches students to perform tech support at their school. GenYes also has a nonprofit side responsible for the curriculum behind the TechYes program in Sacramento.

"Students are the digital generation, yet schools are not coming to terms with the technology revolution. By including students in the planning and implementation of improvement efforts, their passion and optimism about the future is put to good use," Harper said in an e-mail.

But for Megan, technology and GenYes comes down to fun.

"It's really interactive," she said, "and you don't have to listen to teachers blob on."

Send insights or tips on this topic to stefanie.olsen@cnet.com.

13 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
love the ipaq in the picture ;)
really good point you made.. with humour I guess.
Got my kids watching simpsons on their pocketpc while they should be listening to the teacher, that's rather more embarassing..

Nap.
Posted by nap1805 (12 comments )
Reply Link Flag
perhaps the 35mm SLR is supposed to be funny too?
How about a picture of a kid using a digital camera instead? Can't be _that_ hard to find.
Posted by ws808 (7 comments )
Link Flag
Not so fast
While the spread of technology is not a bad thing, we must be careful to ensure the educational value of types of technology in the classroom. With the proliferation of powerpoints have come a generation of class skipping, note readers who ignore lectures and only pay attention to the bare minimum information visually presented to them. With adults botching the use of technology, will kids be any better? Doubtful.
Posted by rootwile (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
When will kids do science with computers?
If we are to fulfill the promise of activities like the human genome
project, it's time to start having our kids <a href="#">use computers for doing science</a>.
Posted by sporte (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Im teaching in grade 6 now...
and to be quite frank asides from listening to music, google images or rudimentary searches, and playing games, most students are ignorant of most technology unless they have parents who are able to expose them to a more broad use of computers at home and not just msn/games/music
Posted by volterwd (466 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Games not all bad but I agree that the kids level of tech knowledge is hype
I am a component level electronic technician and I learned more about computers playing games for a few years than I did when they were being used for real apps.
Posted by simstick (9 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Rubbish.
At age 16, I can code in assembler, C, C++, C#, Java, ECMAScript, PHP, Perl, bash, and DOS, if the latter can be counted as a scripting language. At age seven, I was fluent in HTML. At eight, I taught myself Java, while learning ECMAScript unintentionally (it followed on from HTML and sort of settled on me from reading it a lot). Ten ushered on the Visual Basic era, most of which I've now forgotten, while at twelve I had finished teaching myself C++ and C (in that order). During this year I also discovered that there were other operating systems out there than Windows, and installed RedHat Linux on my desktop (having experimented with DOS, sure that there must be something more to Windows). bash followed quickly; it was a very simple language, and easy to pick up. At age 13 I realised that PHP could be used for other things than server-side backends (for which I already had Java and C++, my favourite language for CGI programs). I delved into Perl a little here too, but didn't really get into it until the age of fourteen, at which I learned C# thoroughly enough to work out that it was basically a Windows-centric Java clone. Last year it was necessary for me to use x86 assembler for a driver I wanted to write, so I promptly downloaded a copy of the free NASM compiler and began learning.

At the same time, people were attempting to train me to make webpages in FrontPage.

Kids are essentially the same as adults. If we have an interest in something, or a necessity of some knowledge, we will learn about it, no matter how much you try to hold us back. But we learn much faster.
Posted by Twey (10 comments )
Link Flag
What students really know
I agree that the average student can bring up a game do hot mail and check on their favorite sports team but God help you if you expect them to take their science project's results and graph them using Excel.
Posted by ljr-tech (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
If kids are teaching, why are teachers receiving salaries?
Kids teaching? What a crock! I ran into a principal who stated the children run the computers at my school. Some of the high schoolers may be able to do some minimal computing technology, however students that have four years have problems with computing.

Some regulation should come into fact here, isn't this like free work for no wages? There are technologists unemployed who need to support families. Why are teachers allowed to show such inadequacies in the classroom? THese students will leave the schools with no respect for their teachers and brag that they know more.

Checks and balances are needed here.
Posted by pmpscheduler (11 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Clarification of four years...
Kids go to college with computer science degrees, graduate and know nothing about computing in the real world.

Basic email, image play, and browsing, even setting up web pages should be a prerequisite for a teacher. If they cannot do the basics, either training or demotion is needed.

There are too many unemployed people in this country for teachers to allow kids teaching computing.
Posted by pmpscheduler (11 comments )
Link Flag
How naive
Thinking that the students are the "Teachers' is pure naivite.
Students act as aides, under the guidence of teachers.

Sure, there may be some small districts where there is a student
acting autonomously, but that would be the exception.

Students often "work" in schools, not in place of adults but as a
learning experience. Back when I was a student, admittedly pre-
computer days, students were media aides, shepherding 16mm
projectors and setting them up. Later they videotaped
productions on one inch wide video tape.

This was resume building for the students. When they applied to
colleges, they listed these activities as their extra-curricular
activities. Not every kid played football or tennis.

This isn't a departure from the past. It's is the past adapting to
the future.
Posted by (2 comments )
Link Flag
Really useful technology is transparent to learning
It is one thing to understand technology, it is another to use it as a panacea to poor performance by our educational system. My kids and now grandkids learned to use VCR and DVD players, respectively, themselves at two! I think we need to focus on nurturing children's ability and desire to learn. That is the real challenge.

Science, mathematics, art. These are the real fabric of technology competence. These disciplines, art especially, seem to suffer in programs that attempt use technology as a glitzy, but still poor surrogate for dreadful schools. Critical thinking and clear expression, like you know, is never, uh, obsolete.

Technologies comes and go. Focus on the joy of discovery and learning. All else will follow.
Posted by dsherr1 (28 comments )
Reply Link Flag
kids as teachers
This makes so much sense. With probably just a little help, students could teach other teachers in the building. Think of the self esteem boost even in elementary school!
Posted by patsyadams (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

  • Recently Viewed Products
  • My Lists
  • My Software Updates
  • Promo
  • Log In | Join CNET