(continued from previous page)
But what should consumers have their eyes on? While some electronics heavyweights are competing for the title of most-likely-to-be-seen-on-MTV's-"Cribs" (see LG's 100-inch and Samsung's 102-inch LCDs or the Panasonic 103-inch plasma TV), bigger isn't necessarily better--especially if it's not in your budget, according to Gene Ornstead of ViewSonic.
That said, the typical HDTV is certainly getting bigger. The price of a 32-inch LCD has come down substantially, according to iSuppli. Consumers are beginning to purchase 32-inch LCD screens for bedrooms, kitchens and offices, while the size of the primary living-room TV is growing. iSuppli says 40 inches and larger is the new trend.
"Thirty-two (inches) was acceptable for your main television, but that is no longer the case," said Riddhi Patel, principal analyst for television systems at iSuppli.
The price difference between the rival flat-panel technologies in that size category will all but disappear by the end of the year, according to Patel. The average price of all brands of 42-inch high-definition plasma sets was just above $2,000 in the second quarter of this year. By the time the holiday shopping season arrives, she said that average should drop to $1,875.
"What is overlooked is the fact that a market is developing, and the opportunity is huge."
Rear-projection TVs, traditionally not as sexy as flat panels, have gradually been left out of the high-definition debate between LCD and plasma. Analysts say that while microdisplay RPTVs might be down, they're not out just yet. Though not as bulky as before, the success of flat panels has hurt a technology for which many had high expectations.
"That market was supposed to do wonders. A lot was going to happen, and there are innovations still happening in that market, but consumers have pretty much lost interest," Patel said.
Why? Although rear projection was previously the pinnacle of big-screen viewing, flat panels are catching up in size and price. The premium of paying for a large HDTV that hangs on a wall has diminished to about $400, according to iSuppli year-end projections.
Still, the technology of microdisplay rear projection is being refined, with attention focused on color improvement and laser and LED as light sources.
The 1080p conundrum
The importance of having a TV capable of 1080p depends on whom you ask. Panasonic's Liao told attendees at the DisplaySearch HDTV conference in August that 1080p is "essential technology for screens larger than 50 inches, especially if you want that immersive experience."
ViewSonic's Ornstead said 1080p is probably overkill for most people who don't consider themselves hard-core videophiles. "I don't see the general consumer even stepping up to HD wanting to step up to the added cost of a 1080p display. It's not like the difference between standard TV and HD."
Any improvement, he said, is much more subtle.
NPD's Baker agreed. Although right now "it's hard to see people jumping $1,000 to get up to 1080p," lower prices in 2007 could encourage more adoption, he said.
As screen sizes grow and resolutions sharpen, so does the benefit of having high-definition content. Blue-laser technology, utilizing a shorter wavelength to create next-generation DVDs with triple the capacity of traditional discs, will be a vital part of HD adoption, according to David Bunzel, managing director of market research firm Santa Clara Consulting Group.
Blue-laser technology encompasses more than movies and players. It's in game consoles and games, PC drives and recordable media, sales of which SCCG predicts will exceed $28 billion by 2010.
However, Bunzel also warns against getting too wrapped up in the so-called format race between HD DVD and Blu-ray. "What is overlooked is the fact that a market is developing, and the opportunity is huge," he said.
When will be a good time to join the race? Bunzel says holiday prices will be a more accurate indication of what you can expect to pay for HD DVD and Blu-ray players.
Although the full HD infrastructure clearly isn't complete, NPD's Baker preaches patience. High prices are just part of the normal growing pains that come when a technology begins to permeate the mainstream consumer consciousness, he says.
"We need to give all this stuff some time to mature and grow into the marketplace," Baker said, which he predicts won't happen until at least 2007 or 2008.
Like the iPod and TiVo, he said, "people tend to dismiss things right off, if they're not huge successes, but time has shown us (that) as these kinds of technologies work their way through, eventually, somebody gets it."
Season's over, so Cuban cheers for HD
High hopes for high definition
HDTV is the life of the DisplaySearch party
HDTV hardware makers fight customer confusion
HDTV--the clincher in war between cable and phone?
A superthin, superlight flat screen
TV industry frets over high definition
What's HDTV without the HD?
Industry groups seek HD dominance
Microsoft inks cable deal for HDTV support
Hitachi announces HDTV models
HDTV market to boom, study says
Clearing up the HDTV picture
Flat-panel TVs can't topple tubes--just yet
The 'Benefactor' behind HDTV
Tuning up for HDTV
Will HDTV antipiracy plan unplug digital networks?
University of Texas installs Ron Jeremy-size HDTV
Why does that new widescreen HDTV look so weird?
The HDTV juggernaut gathers steam
Editors: Jim Kerstetter, Zoë Slocum
Design: Mitjahm Simmons
Production: Jessica Kashiwabara
Many of us are more than willing to pay 15-20% higher price for 1080P and the quality of picture it delivers over and above 1080i. Just because ViewSonic clearly does not want to Spend the R&D money to deliver a high end product.
Please do not insult consumers intelligence by saying we do not need it. I cringe everytime I come to Tokyo and I can not buy the latest 1080P Sony Bravia LCD TV or have to wait 6-9 months for a Japanese product to be ready to be marketed in the America
"Copy Protection
The DVI/HDMI output is blocked"
Many TVs & projects loudly (and apparently, legally) proclaim to be "fully HDTV compatible", but if they do not also support the HDCP standard they are now literally useless. Most manufactures do not offer any kind of firmware upgrade/etc to fix the problem - you're just screwed. (Note to manufactures: Not a smart way to treat your valuable "early adopter" customers who shelled out $thousands$ on your early models; that will not exactly encourage "customer loyalty").
So BUYER BEWARE! If you get a HDTV or projector, especially an older one, make sure it specifically supports HDCP!
Time to let the suckers buy the overpriced junk, and wait till the smoke and mirrors have evapourated with prejudice!
Oh well, fence sitting appears to be the best option, at this point in time!
Screens as big as 100 inches will be much more reasonably priced than the ridiculous prices they are currently charging for plasma and LCDs. I advise anyone thinking about purchasing an HDTV to wait just a little longer. A much better technology is on the immediate horizon.
- I Hate Sitting ...
- by markdoiron September 7, 2006 5:34 AM PDT
- I hate sitting too close to a screen. I can't possibly imagine sitting 6-1/2 feet away from a 65-inch screen and enjoying it, much less "achiev[ing] that hyperreal feeling."
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)On top of that, I, like many folks my age (read that as the majority of folks who can afford these sets, BTW), wear bifocals. I guess I'd have to buy a special pair of glasses for TV viewing.
Nope. I'll be happy with a 42-inch TV in my rather large living room, on the wall opposite my sofa. And, based on anecdotal evidence, I'm not convinced that the higher resolution HD sets will offer quality that I'll be able to see.
mark d.