Apple Computer let developers know this week that its next Mac OS X version, Leopard, should spring onto store shelves next spring. It also lifted the veil a bit for planned operating-system features, but it held back some details.
Part of the secrecy was to prevent Microsoft from copying Apple's ideas, CEO Steve Jobs suggested. "We don't want our friends to start their photocopiers any sooner than they have to," he said.
It's a reminder of the operating-system rivalry between the two companies. Apple has touted itself as the innovator in such software; it has suggested that all the new additions in Windows Vista already exist in the most recent Mac OS X, Tiger. Microsoft might take issue with that, but there's no denying it has struggled somewhat with Vista, which has had features cut and seen a series of delays.
To find out what people on the street make of it, we asked our Vista Views panel, made up of ordinary readers, this question: Which feature in Leopard would you like to see in Vista?
How about some hype? Leopard's got it. Apple delivers promises and great products--it already has a next-gen graphics engine, indexed searching, smart folders, smarter navigation and promises that more remain to be revealed of Leopard's features. On the other hand, Vista's really pushing people's patience--it's delayed repeatedly, loses features as it gets closer to shipping, is bloated and possibly will harass the user at every action.
David Dawson is the team leader for research and development at Community IT Innovators (CITI), an organization providing technology support to socially responsible organizations in the Washington, DC area.
But it doesn't surprise me that they couldn't get their joke right; they couldn't even copy the Windows logo properly in the keynote.
From what I can tell, there isn't anything in the new OS X that I can't get in Vista, and then some. I can have a Tablet and a Media Center in one computer. I can hook up my Xbox 360 to that same machine (which Mac can't do) and watch TV recorded off my digital cable tuner (which Mac won't have). And you won't need to have Office anymore to get some basic features like spam protection and calendaring. So I get all the features and more, without the smug self-righteousness of the pseudo-intellectual Mac zealotry.
What more could you ask for in an OS?
Robert McLaws is an IT consultant, community leader and Vista enthusiast. He has been running Vista enthusiast site Longhornblogs.com since 2002.
From a technical point of view, Window's System Restore feature is actually superior to Mac OS X's Time Machine, since System Restore can work on a single hard disk, while Time Machine requires a second hard disk. The big difference is the way Microsoft and Apple implemented this same feature.
Under Windows, you click through a series of dialog boxes, radio buttons and calendars to find a restore point to return to. Not visually exciting or intuitive, but practical and efficient. Under Time Machine, you can see a series of your previous window contents extending off into the distance, and click or search for the window you want to restore from the past.
From a technical point of view, Window's System Restore is superior but from a user's point of view, Mac OS X's Time Machine is far superior. Given the choice between using a great program with a mediocre interface (Windows System Restore) or a mediocre program with a dazzling interface (Time Machine), guess which one is going to generate the most excitement?
Apple isn't necessarily great at innovating, but they are far superior when it comes to implementing their ideas in ways that the average user can understand immediately, and that's where the Mac OS X shines over anything Microsoft Windows could ever offer.
The best way for Vista to compete with Mac OS X? Have Microsoft dump Vista, and license Mac OS X to run on ordinary PCs. Otherwise, given Mac OS X and a copy of Parallels with Windows running in a virtual machine, Vista has no chance to compete, no matter what features it might add.
Wallace Wang is a freelance computer journalist and author whose books include "Microsoft Office for Dummies" and "Steal This Computer Book."
I think it's time to shift the paradigm of the way desktops should look and operate. It would be interesting to be able to have more than one desktop that you could easily access, and put applications aside. There's a lot of potential for this that Vista could explore, especially with the new graphical interface. Hopefully, we'll be wowed away by some of Vista's features when it arrives.
Brian Lambert is a law student at Southern Illinois University.
I would really like to see Time Machine implemented in some way into Vista. It's better than System Restore, because this is talking about your own personal files and not just system files. Plus, (if) you just want to get a file instead of having to do a full restore, you can do that too.
Kevin Faaborg works in basic hardware and software guidance for a large financial corporation, but he has experience in more computer sales-based jobs.
Long-term answer, which I have been saying for YEARS: Bill, take some of your billions, buy the best and brightest programmers in the world, and make a brand-spanking-new OS absolutely positively from scratch. No DOS, no Windows, no xNIX, no backwards compatibility; start completely over and do it right. Kids, can you say "21st century?"
David Price is a senior accident analyst at one of the U.S.'s top research and development national laboratories and an award-winning nature photographer.
Say I have one desktop devoted to instant messengers, with contact lists and conversation/video windows. On another desktop, I am reading and writing e-mail, another has a full-screen Web browser with 15 tabs open. And finally, I leave one desktop blank (perhaps except for Sidebar set to "always on top" for just this one window), so I can see all my desktop icons without needing to minimize (and then restore) all my open windows.
Vista probably could very easily implement virtual desktops, since all UI elements, including the desktop itself, are 3D objects. Just make a few more of the Desktop objects and tag each window with the desktop(s) it is visible on. Make it easy to change which desktop(s) a window is on, and add some flashy graphics affects to chew GPU cycles. Use a hotkey combo, like Ctrl-WinKey+Tab, to switch.
Windows, you are the last major OS on the train here.
Chris Hacking is a computer engineering student at the University of Washington, Seattle who has worked in Web development and freelance software development.
I would have to say, the built-in video-conferencing feature. Pretty much all Macs come with a video camera these days. It would be nice to have this be available in Vista without downloading a separate program.
Jason Klomps of Tucson, Ariz., works in IT support for a call center.
I'd like Vista to do Boot Camp. In reverse.
John Kneeland is an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania, where he is majoring in international relations and East Asian studies.
The Vista Views panel is being brought together by CNET News.com to discover what people on the street think about Microsoft's new operating system.
We're looking for a range of perspectives--from beta testers to business buyers to home PC owners.
Interested in joining the panel pool? Here's how it works:
Whenever key Vista news breaks, we'll e-mail a question to contributors. Sometimes, we'll ask a yes/no question and use the answers for a simple poll. Other times, we'll look for more in-depth feedback on Vista events. It doesn't matter whether you send us two pages or two sentences--we value your comments. And if you don't have an opinion on a particular story, or you don't have time to respond, that's fine too.
The feedback will often reach our readers. Our writers may quote panel remarks in stories. Or we may pull together comments--your two cents--in an article of their own. Occasionally, we'll ask contributors to take part in a weekly podcast to discuss their views with News.com editors and industry experts.
We want to know what our readers think, as Microsoft gets ready for one of its most important launches in years. If you haven't signed up yet, send an e-mail to us at vista-views@cnet.com.
Design: Gautama Swamy
Production: Kristina Wood
look for "virtual desktop manager"
Vista 1.0?
No. It means they did one (and actually a lot more) better than
Vista.
But it doesn't surprise me that they couldn't get their joke
right; they couldn't even copy the Windows logo properly in the
keynote.
- Glad you watched Steve's keynote. Nice to see an OS that
actually exists, isn't it?
From what I can tell, there isn't anything in the new OS X
that I can't get in Vista, and then some. ... So I get all the
features and more, without the smug self-righteousness of the
pseudo-intellectual Mac zealotry.
Not quite true. These are all features you HOPE to get. You sure
don't have them in your hands right now.
What more could you ask for in an OS?
How about that it SHIP?
Robert McLaws is an IT consultant, community leader and
Vista
enthusiast. He has been running Vista enthusiast site
Longhornblogs.com since 2002.
And by all accounts will still be running it, waiting for Vista, into
2007. Do I hear 2008? 2009?
pseudo-intellectual Mac zealot" but he sounds an awful lot like a
"smug self-righteous pseudo-intellectual Windows zealot." Is
that supposed to be better somehow?
And, though he surely knows this, calling it Vista 2.0 does not
mean Apple is copying Vista 1.0. The idea is that Tiger is
already Vista 1.0 and Leopard is the next step.
Second, Wallace Wang is not correct about Time Machine
requring a second hard disk. Apple's web site says that in
prefernces you choose the drive or *volume* to back up to. You
can choose a disk partition in other words, perhaps even a disk
image that is located on the same partition (i.e. a virtual
volume). So, we at least have external disk, disk partition, and
server as possible backup locations.
That said, we are talking about backups here. A second drive is
clearly preferable. It may seem "technically superior" to have it
all on one drive, but nobody who has a hard drive fail will think
that.
take some of your billions, buy the best and brightest
programmers in the world, and make a brand-spanking-new OS
absolutely positively from scratch. No DOS, no Windows, no
xNIX, no backwards compatibility; start completely over and do
it right. Kids, can you say "21st century?" "
I'm by no means a Windows fan, but I believe competition is
imperative to the survivability and great feature offerings of
MacOS X. I want the Mac, Apple, and the MacOS to survive and
prosper until I am 110 and can no longer see the screen. For
that to happen, Apple needs to constantly have something with
which to compete, in order to keep raising the bar, back and
forth. Apple borrows sometimes from Windows, Windows
sometimes from Mac, and both from others.
Windows does NOT need to go away...they need to get better.
Re-write the whole thing, like D. Price said, from scratch, just
like Apple did with OS X.
have an imperfect perception as to what a Mac is and what it
does. You'd be suprised in fact how very wrong these people
can be. Many Windows users might look at Time Machine and
say, "System Restore does this" or "Windows Server 2003 does
this". Not true. System Restore restores the SYSTEM (and only
the system). This means that no deleted or changed documents
are restored. Just Applications and Windows. Windows Server
2003 it not a consumer product so therefore it is pointless to
compare it to Apple's Leopard. In addition, the backup method
in Windows Server 2003 is not graceful or easy to use at all. It is
the way that Apple is implementing Time Machine that makes it
special.
With Expose, Dashboard, and Spotlight - most Windows users
wouldn't realise how useful they are, because they don't use
Macs. I have my mighty mouse side buttons set to Expose, and
it is perfect for switching applications in an instant. Dashboard
skips a few steps in opening up a browser and navigating to a
website, and spotlight is a great application launcher as well as a
way to find files. Only does Vista get any of these features.
This just scratches the surface of why Mac OS X is superior to
Windows. The little things about Mac OS X are just as important
as the big things. Not to mention that Mac OS X is beautiful.
I would guarantee that if all consumers used a Mac for one
month, at least 7 out of 10 would refuse to switch back after
that month.
And also, seriously Windows fan boys -- stop grasping at straws
making lame arguments. For example, someone said, "If
Leopard is Windows Vista 2.0, then Apple is copying Vista".
Common. Thats the biggest line of BS I've heard all day. That
logic is totally screwing. Seeing as Vista 2.0 is not out -- or
even being developed yet, there is nothing to copy. By saying
that Leopard is Vista 2.0, you are making the implication that
Leopard will have the features that Vista 2.0 will have - and
since Leopard would come first - Microsoft is therefore effectivly
copying Leopard.
I wonder if Spaces includes the ability to anchor an item so it shows up in all the virtual desktops (like an IM chat window while you keep working on other things).
Doees Spaces handle only 4? I know with Linux's desktop environments you can choose (1 .. 10? 12? 15? +++?).
Personally I love using the virtual desktops and that's one feature I would LOVE for Windows to have.
Windows Users state that Time machine offers nothing more than system restore... time machine is for the work you do on your computer not just your system settings and configuration files... which i find interesting... it seems windows users do a lot of system settings and configuration changes where Mac users are worried about changing things they have worked on back to previous versions...
I, for one, would like to see some decent debate (a concept notably different in its execution, as compared to "argument") between people who A) actually know what they're talking about, and B) can supress the childish urge to follow every half-witted point with an inflated-ego-driven insult.
You may well find that "zealots" on the other side or actually willing to listen to what you have to say if you can avoid labelling them with cliches like "fanboy"...
System Restore is not only for system files but your any thing you want Windows to make a backup of so you can retore it if you make a mistake.
In Vista System Restore is expaned to include Shadow Copies which is a versing type system already included in Windows Server 2003 that allow you backup any files, folders or applications that change on your system. System also allows you to store you backup copies on any media that Vista can access (CD/DVD-ROM, Internal/External Harddrive/ another PC using either Network/USB/IEE 1394
As you can see, Shadow copy is quite the backup beast and is superior to Leopard Time Machine. \
Personally I find Time Machine to actually be more of a pain then a feature. Graphical stuff like Time Machine can be fun for the first time but when you happen to save over hours of work by mistake with something you did not want, the last thing you care about is a Stary backgroup why you try to find the version of your work before the save. You want something that is easy, guick and get you up and running without much fuss. Having some flippable graphical whiz bang feature is not it. Being able to simple right click on your document select the previous version before the same and get back to work sounds a lot cleaner and a much better approach.
Just because you can make something pretty doesn't mean you should. This actually may be a lesson that Apple learn from MS.
But, Microsoft will never do this since they can't even get what they have out the door in the same decade they start it in.
Microsoft is pathetic when it comes to its upgrades, even Office 2007 has three different interfaces. One for Word, Excel, etc. One for Publisher and another for Outlook. What they couldn't just pick one.
But, then Apple is also pathetic. They are a bigger monopoly than Microsoft, they just don't have as many customers so the government does't care. The control the OS, the hardware and in the case of iPod they control all of that plus the file format and DRM so it doesn't work with other products without having to jump through hoops.
Face it the computer industry as a whole sucks. Intel and AMD... hey people how about a whole new hardware platform? Why do we still have to worry about IRQ's and DMA's? Because they like Microsoft keep building junk on top of rotten foundations. You would think they were cows the way they all like to milk things.
Robert
And still, after all that, I keep anything a real value off the Windows' laptop. I don't trust the os one bit.
In contrast, Mac OS X has never hiccuped in two years. The fact that everything on OS X is easier with eye candy is?well, icing.
If MS could have 1/2 that record they'd be really making progress.
s
I think that McLaws' comment wins the booby prize:
"He has been running Vista enthusiast site Longhornblogs.com
since 2002."
Waiting all those years and he still doesn't get it.
Let's look at the two different approaches...
Microsoft continusouly introduces new products long before they are ready, takes too long to get them out the door, has armies of testers yet still releases products littered with defects, provides inadequate product support and delivers little to zero innovation. The company is a joke, has a monopoly but it will eventually end without a significant paradigm shift in its approach. People tolerate Microsoft because there are not accepted better options on the market. When better options exist, people will defect. A large number of users are moving to Mac OS and I would guess that most of these users will never return to Windows and will motivate others to switch.
Apple keep its products a secret and most recently has released products ahead or on-time. Because they make the hardware, there is better OS integration and the products are more reliable. Product support is very good. Steve Jobs is most concerned with controlling the user experience. Mac OS will increasingly become a better option for users.
I use my Windows desktop for gaming only. And user a PowerBook for work and I find that my laptop running Tiger co-exists on my Microsoft/Exchange network at the office better than my prior ThinkPad running Windows XP. It boots up quicker, shuts down quicker, manages power better, never crashes, does not require me to log into my network domain until I actually accessing something in the domain, and Microsoft Entourage allows me to access my Exchange server data using our Outlook Web Access as opposed to an IP address therefore when remote I do not need to VPN into my works network to be productive with my email and calendar, etc.
While I agree the Leopard's enhancements might not be too compelling, I suspect that Tiger will be a much better product than Vista and that home and corporate users will be very very slow to upgrade.
the world? Did MS create Back-ups? I don't think so. The point
here is that MS has that feature and NO ONE uses it. If you saw
the presentation, that was the point made. Of the 26% that
actually do ANY sort of backing-up, only 4% actually do a real
back-up. So Time Machine is about getting people to USE it
because it's simplicity. The Copy stuff is about all the other
features that MS DID actually copy like Aqua and Witgets. Did
you know that there was a form of widgets back in OS7? But it's
now when Apple decided to implement it in OSX?
Who said they need to implement their logo right? Hell I didn't
notice what your talking about, but i got the point he was
making, even with his screwed up French accent...
You wouldn't get the same stuff that comes with a mac even if
you got 10 PCs. What are you talking about? Do you get built in
1st Class Video conferencing where you can actually control
some elses computer while you look at them? I don't think so, do
you get iMovie? iPhoto, a built in Dictionary that is SYSTEM WIDE?
an Application like Preview where you can save almost any file to
ANY file format? A system that is built on PDF? Should I go on
and on and on, wake up dude, we use Macs because it actually
makes things possible for us instead of spending our time
troubleshooting or getting interupted by some ridiculous pop up
window from the SYSTEM telling me this or that... Who needs
that?? I sure dont'... Hell, I can remember setting up a machine
for a friend, we finished with all the license bull and what do we
get at startup? A freaking sales pitch of some who knows what?
I mean what is that all about? We spend our $$ on a machine
and now it's trying to sell me some bull like a cheap sales man?
My cousin has a Tablet, Jesus, what a pile of junk. It is slow as
melaces and I can't figure out what's the point of the entire
machine... Those hinges are going to pop like popcorn... and
for what? to flip the damn thin over? and at a cost of over $2K!
So you use your XBox as a digital tuner? Hum, that's an option.
But I don't think I need to spend $500 for that. Apple ships with
Front Row, I think that's all I need on my intertainment system
with 1.5 Terrabite, a TIVO and OSX. H264 Rocks and that's all.
- HAHAHA
- by Mephux August 9, 2006 5:51 PM PDT
- Watch the keynote idiot... Look and the time between os releases....
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (200 Comments)Vista is a copy.. A waste of time and a worthless gesture of
innovative thinking.
Like they said in the keynote. "If you can't innovate, you imitate.
However, its never are good as the original."