Version: 2008

(continued from previous page)

Half a century of hard drives

 Previous page

"The approach Rey Johnson pursued was unique in the industry," Hoagland said. "It wasn't obvious. The multiple disk stack on the RAMAC gives roughly 240 square feet of recording area. Any time you slice something really thin, you get two new surfaces."

To get data out of a stack of disks, though, Johnson's team had to develop heads that could move up and down the stack without touching the disks. It also had to figure out how to synchronize various processes. "There were a lot of things that were a total departure," Hoagland said.

Besides giving IBM the lead in drives, the invention of RAMAC also prompted IBM to erect its drive factory in San Jose because the company realized that the expertise couldn't be easily replicated elsewhere, according to Hoagland. Although it ultimately sold its hard-drive business to Hitachi, Big Blue became one of the biggest employers and largest landowners in what would become Silicon Valley.

Despite a constant string of buyouts and power shifts in the tech industry, the level of competition in the drive business hasn't changed much over the decades. Drive makers' latest challenge is flash memory.

The drive industry scored a coup in 2001, when Apple Computer put a 1.8-inch Toshiba drive into the first iPod. Apple also became the first company to adopt 1-inch microdrives on a wide scale with the iPod Mini. Now microdrives are on their way out.

"The 1-inch volumes have come down significantly, impacted severely by flash. Right now, we are looking for a new application for the 1-inch (drive)," Healy said.

"The 1-inch volumes have come down significantly, impacted severely by flash. Right now, we are looking for a new application for the 1-inch (drive)."
--Bill Healy, SVP of product strategy and marketing, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies

To survive, drive makers have begun to integrate vertically, producing components such as heads and disks themselves rather than buying them from third-party vendors. It's a completely different tack than the rest of the IT industry. But by bringing things in-house, manufacturers can better control production and quality.

They can also introduce innovations more rapidly.

To build up or defend sales, manufacturers are looking for ways to enhance their drives, such as simplifying data encryption processes. The security angle will likely come in handy in the next battleground with flash: notebooks. In the next few years, flash will first appear in small notebooks targeted at vertical markets such as defense, according to executives of flash-producing companies.

Hitachi's Healy, among others, scoffs at the idea of flash notebooks hitting the mainstream anytime soon. "As a buyer, someone is going to try to convince you to buy something with 30GB of storage when, for a few dollars more, you can buy something with a 160GB hard drive," he said.

Despite the tough financial circumstances of the drive world, the technology has aged well. Drive makers have generally managed to double the capacity of their products every couple of years for decades. (That's on pace with Moore's Law, but the underlying principles are different.) During the late '90s, capacity was doubling nearly every year.

Perpendicular recording, in which bits are stacked on top of each other on a platter, may enable drive makers to once again accelerate the density growth rate over the next few years. However, the method's benefits likely will begin to slow down circa 2010, when drives are set to be capable of storing 500 gigabits to 1 terabit per square inch.

At that point, industry players will have to introduce drives based on new technology to continue the pace of progress. Without changes, further increases in density will cause drives to lose data at room temperature.

Hitachi favors adopting patterned media. In this technique, recording film on a drive is segmented into pattered dots. This prevents one bit, or dot, from flipping its neighbor. Seagate, on the other hand, favors heat-assisted recording. In this method, a laser inside the drive heats the platters to record or erase data; at room temperature, the platters are inert.

Although both techniques will eventually be incorporated into drives, it remains unclear which one will come next. Ultimately, the decision could turn on which technology looks easier to bring to mass-manufacturing.

"You've got to figure out how to do this not just in a lab demonstration, but by producing them in the hundreds of millions," said Porter of Disk/Trend. "The good news is that you have people working in both of these camps and maybe others. There's nano this and nano that."

No matter which technology innovation makes it to market first, the end for hard drives is not near.

"We can see 50 (terabits) to 100 terabits (per square inch) being possible," Seagate's Kryder said. "Mother Nature has provided us with a technology that is scalable to very, very high densities, so you just keep working at the problem with enough engineers, and you make progress on it steadily."  

Video

Looking back 50 years
On Sept. 13, 1956, IBM announces the world's first hard drive, the RAMAC, and explains in this silent film its invention.

Photos

Making the first disk drive
IBM completed the RAMAC 50 years ago. Compare its stack of 50 platters to today's 1-inchers.


A brief history of hard drives
Hitachi Global Storage Technologies has collected pictures from hard-drive history.


New hard-drive technologies
Patterned media, heat-assisted recording could help drive makers keep adding capacity.


Related stories
News around the Web
Credits

Editors: Mike Ricciuti, Zoë Slocum
Design: Mitjahm Simmons
Production: Jessica Kashiwabara


Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
What about speed, silly?
by kaigironsha September 11, 2006 9:07 AM PDT
Miniaturization and capacity are very nice, but this article completely missed the biggest for frustration for me and many users: speed. If you look at a graph of the last decade's jumps in processor speed and compare that rate of improvement with HD performance, it's pretty stark. Way too many tasks are disk-bound. Time to remove this bottleneck!
Reply to this comment
new technology?
by bumalong September 11, 2006 10:03 AM PDT
Isn't it past time to put old Tom Edison's phonograph back in the attic, and develop new technology for storage? It wasn't that long ago that SRI's (Static Ram Interfaces ) were eschewed because of their 32K limit. Now we have multi-gig USB flash drives. I say, put Ol' Tom's Graphanola back in the attic where it belongs, and go static. No more mechanical failures, noisy operation, sudden outages. Just think: storage with no moving parts to wear out....
Reply to this comment
Samsung Develops Tiny 32 Gb Flash Chip
by baechul September 11, 2006 10:11 AM PDT
The memory would replace hard disks sooner than what was expected.

http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200609/200609110023.html
Reply to this comment
Platters of bits...
by vanrock70 September 11, 2006 10:28 AM PDT
The first computer I used that had hard disks was the IBM 1130, with its removable single-platter cartridge; by then the 14 inch platters held about ten Mbytes. Another fifteen years, and washing-machine-size boxes with multi-platter packs were the norm. I still have an eight-platter pack in my "archives". I think it held 750 Mbytes. Now..my pocket flash "drive" holds about that much. I expect someday newborns will get a pea-sized thing installed in the Mastoid bone: cell phone/PDA/computer, and who knows what else besides.
Reply to this comment
Microdrives in the iPod Mini
by chrisgarty September 11, 2006 11:02 AM PDT
"Apple also became the first company to adopt 1-inch microdrives on a wide scale with the iPod Nano"

Not so, it was the iPod mini. The Nano uses only flash as the article linked during this paragraph points out.

I'm looking forward to those 100tb per square inch drives... :)
Reply to this comment
iPod Mini not Nano
by fjdulles September 11, 2006 12:09 PM PDT
The iPod Mini, not the nano had a 1 inch hard drive inside.
Reply to this comment
Perpendicular recording doesn't stack bits on to of each other.
by fjdulles September 11, 2006 12:16 PM PDT
As the link in this article about perpendicular recording explains,
perpendicular recording doesn't stack bits oon top of each other.
Rather, the magnetic domains are flipped on their side relative to
how they were oriented in older drives, which turns out to allow
them to be safetly packed closer together.
Reply to this comment
5 MB HD
by wtortorici September 11, 2006 5:52 PM PDT
If memory serves me I purchased a WD 5 MB in 1982 foe $499 plus shipping for my TRS 80. It used the same connection as the 5.25" floppies.
Reply to this comment
Old HD days are nubered
by Stan Johnson September 11, 2006 8:38 PM PDT
It is high time for newer faster more reliable technology. There is a great need to move beyond the popular (but old) hard drive technology we currently now use.
Reply to this comment
Univac Options
by grmells September 12, 2006 12:16 AM PDT
I worked on Univac 1108 gear in the early 70's and it still had a drum as local high speed storage, the Fastrand drum for next fastest (it address methaod of position, head (or track) and sector was still the method used to assign storage, and a then new 550Mb drive unit that had 24 inch platters in a 3 by 3 by 4 foot enclosure.
Reply to this comment
Univac Options
by grmells September 12, 2006 12:18 AM PDT
I worked on Univac 1108 gear in the early 70's and it still had a drum as local high speed storage, the Fastrand drum for next fastest (it address methaod of position, head (or track) and sector was still the method used to assign storage, and a then new 550Mb drive unit that had 24 inch platters in a 3 by 3 by 4 foot enclosure.
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Previous page
Page 1 | 2
advertisement