Version: 2008

With its $1.65 billion purchase of YouTube, Google takes the lead in Internet video--and could be taking on a host of copyright troubles.


Current stories


With YouTube, Google puts its competitors in a jam

news analysis Build off what they have, or buy a second-tier site? For Microsoft and Yahoo, there's no easy way to make the Internet video market a horse race.
October 10, 2006

Google makes video play with YouTube buy

YouTube will operate independently and the companies will work together on building new features.
October 9, 2006

Google-YouTube and the value of social computing

commentary Yes, there are some very real copyright challenges. But this deal is a harbinger of the impending social-video Web.
October 10, 2006

YouTube may add to Google's copyright worries

Popular video-sharing site already faces legal heat. Will its acquisition make Google a high-profile lawsuit target?
October 9, 2006

OK, so Eric Schmidt is a moron

perspective CNET News.com's Charles Cooper writes that Google's $1.65 billion deal for YouTube puts Mark Cuban in the position of soothsayer.
October 9, 2006

Internet deals of the damned

More often than not, big Internet acquisitions turn out to be disappointments, or at least a bit ahead of their time.
October 9, 2006

Video site buying spree in the offing?

Some observers wonder if more deals will follow Google's acquisition of YouTube.
October 9, 2006

Original YouTubers rule on YouTube

blog YouTube's co-founders and their informal, fuzzy-looking video about the Google takeover is ruling YouTube today--at least, traffic-wise.
October 10, 2006

YouTube, your copyright and Google

blog Those intrepid mavens at Google clearly think, or hope, they can deal with one realm of uncertainty: What about copyrighted material?
October 9, 2006


Related coverage


YouTube cuts three content deals

Universal, Sony BMG and CBS have joined Warner in offering the legal use of their content for YouTube videos.
October 9, 2006

Analysts don't like YouTube's chances

Forrester argues that while YouTube may have media companies' attention, one copyright lawsuit could undo it all.
October 2, 2006

Sony gets into video sharing with Grouper hug

The entertainment giant's Hollywood studio pays $65 million for Grouper, a lesser light than the boffo YouTube.
August 22, 2006

Videos
MP3.com founder takes on MySpace, YouTube
At AlwaysOn Stanford Summit, YouTube CEO says his site will remain for and by the people.


YouTube's Hurley stands his ground
Panel addresses future of consumer-generated media at the AlwaysOn Stanford Summit.


What's next for Flash?
Web tool celebrates birthday, looks to future.


CEO of MP3tunes has advice for YouTube
Michael Robertson has some advice for his fellow entrepreneurs on running video ads.


Video sharing is vehicle for propaganda
Video-sharing sites allow soldiers to tell their story.


Photos
Ten tech-related YouTube clips you shouldn't miss
From the chimp playing Pac-Man to Jon Stewart's jabs at Sen. Ted Stevens.



Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
One more silicon valley (Big US Media) Hoax
by free_people October 9, 2006 9:40 PM PDT
This is just more silicon valley (big US Media) Hoax. It is a shell game to create an illusion of value created, to make people say WOW this UTube must be something very special, and same about Google, when in fact they are hardly so.

I mean take a look at who is the major owner of both Google & UTube. It is Sequioa capital. Can't you see the mind game that they are playing with people? On one hand Sequioa capital buys UTube shares for 5 Cents per share, same for what they paid for Google shares, OTOH they get Google to buy these shares off their hand for something like $100 per share ($1.6Bill valuation) and then they turn around dump the Google shares, which they have now hyped even higher due to this purchase, on the unsuspecting public who has no idea this shell game is going on, who has no idea that the main Google & UTube owners are the same Sequioa capital.
BTW, Sequioa also is/was major owner of Yahoo.
Cant you see the game they are playing!
One must give it to these people, they are damn smart. Or the masses damn blind
to not notice this game that the SiliconValley + WallStreet VC & Investment Banking mafia have
been playing at their expense for some time now.
Reply to this comment
Why are search engine monopolies good for us?
by Sandra_Kerns October 10, 2006 8:02 AM PDT
Why Google buying UTube is of any value to us who are interested in having the best search engine to search on and to advertise on? WHY!

Look what we need is not search engines that are in 100s of different businesses today and getting into ever more tomorrow, as are the case with the Google & Yahoo search engine monopolies.
What we need is a pure search engine player who is ONLY AND ONLY in the search engine business, thus we are certain that it's results will not be biased to the 100s of different business interests that they have. And we can be safe from them unfairly promoting their business interest over our businesses. That is why I have been using Anoox search engine and urging all to switch
to Anoox. You can find them here in case:
www.anoox.com

Say "NO" to search engine media monopolies, that are little by little taking over the Web, well whatever lucrative good parts of the Web there are, and say "Yes..." to search engine freedom by switching to the Not-for-Profit and Open source Anoox search engine.
Lets take back the Web :)
Reply to this comment
you tube sellout
by chewy52 October 18, 2006 3:26 PM PDT
so google have made another site ? i awiat to see how thay handel copyright older members to you tube will all be choked as it leave them in a state of limbo i await what plans google plans to make with the you tube franchise? and I wont hold my breath.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement